Jump to content

BeastFromTheEast

Members
  • Posts

    4,266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BeastFromTheEast

  1. 3 minutes ago, DocATL said:


    If we had weather chats through those 50 we would have bitched through most of them. emoji2375.png


    .

    After last year’s dog turd of a winter, I am satisfied with this years experience. Hell of an improvement from last year if we’re keeping it real. 
     

    we had 17” or whatever it was at ORD last season

    • Like 1
  2. Clunker months are going to happen even in an A/B level winter.

    IMO It’s all about the seasonal snow fall total at the end. 

    Solid B for me in the NW burbs with the memorable NOV. 


    Here’s a hypothetical, what if we received the ~30” at ORD in 3 even 10” shots or 4-7.5” storms?
     

    Would that change any one’s grades? 

    • Like 2
  3. 1 hour ago, Malacka11 said:

    The amount of happy chemicals my brain managed to derive from a ten-minute lunch break dog walk in 28 and sunny almost just shot me straight through "I guess I'd still take a big dawg" season.

    The human body’s thermoregulation never ceases to amaze me! That same 28 and sunny in November would feel downright cold.
     

    After a couple of cold winter months though it now feels lovely! :sizzle:

    • Like 2
  4. 32 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said:

    This could end up being the most widespread-significant nearly pure multi-band LES events that I can remember on this side of the lake...

    1405413660_Screenshot2026-01-25110134.thumb.png.80609cde0f62535b9c81b24641a18fa9.png

     

    Definitely one of the more potent LE  events on this side of the Lake in recent memory. Jan 22 2005 was fun too. 
     

    https://mesonet.agron.iastate.edu/current/mcview.phtml?prod=lotrad&java=script&mode=archive&frames=13&interval=5&year=2005&month=1&day=22&hour=12&minute=25

     

    IMG_3683.jpeg

  5. your a pretty abrasive guy for posting that you saw MYI growth where there was none. You still haven't posted how the MYI is growing.

    You cliamed there were Countless papers on cryosat2. You posted ZERO of them.

    You completely dismissed out right methane leaking through ice cracks and again you were wrong.

    Is ironic that your in this thread grilling these guys on this when you continue to not back up

    the claims you make.

    You may want to be more fair

    Claimed

    It is

  6. You are the only person on this thread, or any other thread, who has used the terms "most" or "majority" in reference to the emission of arctic methane. If you had actually read any of the papers that have been referenced you could have learned that release of even a small percentage (much less than half) of the methane reservoir will have serious climate impact.

    By continuing your rant you are making yourself look silly and are trashing what little credibility you have.

    lolwut?

×
×
  • Create New...