Jump to content

ajr

Members
  • Posts

    379
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ajr

  1. 3 minutes ago, FallsLake said:

    For what it's worth, the 6z NAM is much colder then the 0z/6z GFS (at hour 84) with the push of surface dew points. CAD being under-modeled?  

    That’s good to hear - in the past few years the NAM has handled temps better than globals (Jan 2017 comes to mind)

    • Like 1
  2. 17 minutes ago, griteater said:

    My own opinion is that the GFS isn't nearly cold enough at the sfc if we get this setup in the end.  This is a sick cold air damming setup here

     

    Agree.. looking at sounding at hr 180 verbatim when the low is approaching KILM, you can see the warm nose clearly.. then looking at the winds at the 850mb level, you can see the SE flow we don't want.

    gfs_2018120212_fh180_sounding_35.71N_79_08W.thumb.png.89c9a2c4d371602dcb19402cbd781cf8.png

    gfs_mslp_uv850_seus_31.png

×
×
  • Create New...