Jump to content

WinterWolf

Members
  • Posts

    18,135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinterWolf

  1. Oh ya I understand that...just thought I’d let you know in case you didn’t.
  2. Bro..just drive in the snow and save yourself some dough...it’ll be pedestrian at best here.
  3. That model just sucks Ass period. BTW, Red Arrow snowmobile club in St. Agatha already grooming...
  4. That would make it SE of its last run no? And probably a little colder too.
  5. And there’s my point..it’s on crack. Just like yesterday night when it went full on Rambo on the whole area...that ain’t happening either.
  6. Small state yes...but not for heavy precip literally all around it , to just miss completely like that NAM run showed. No way.
  7. But not to that ridiculous degree. Not even close. Western areas(west of the river ) did ok on the Euro and CMC.
  8. Ya A snow/subsidence Hole is one thing....but the whole State of CT? While the Hudson valley to our west, and NYC to our SW, and NJ to our SW. and western Mass to our north, and Boston to our NE all get whaled? That just seems like the ultimate cosmic Dildo for an entire State-not just a 10 -15 mile Snow hole. I mean absolutely everything would have to go wrong for that to ever happen..everything. And that’s as rare as needing everything To go absolutely right. Even in Boxing Day I did ok relatively speaking with that mess..just never got into the absolute crazy stuff(after being forecasted to) and ended up with about a foot. But this is showing practically nothing for the whole state of CT From rnd 2?? I just don’t buy it with so much uncertainty on the second round.
  9. Lol right. Im not buying the NAM one bit. Not cuz it skips me(CT), but because it literally gives every other direction/area the goods...but one. I just don’t see that happening. If it skipped CT and places West and NW and SW...and then went over to the NE..that’d be much more believable. But not this stupidity.
  10. That ain’t happening...it’s not gonna play out like that with the whole state missing out for the most part on an ULL south of LI like that. at times one has to question some of these ideas...you know Meteorology..not modelology.
  11. Ya but I think that changes going forward. You put an ULL in that spot south of us...and everywhere but CT gets some goods? I ain’t buying that at all.
  12. That can’t be correct. I mean cmon...the whole state gets completely missed by this ULL that’s south of LI?? Everybody else gets in on it, but it completely jumps over CT? Something seems off?
  13. Wow..that Has me at 82% for over 6 inches, I wouldn’t have thought that. But it’s certainly encouraging nonetheless. Thanks for posting Ginx.
  14. Absolutely. I get that it’s what we would love to have happen, but that’s a whole different thing from what Actually DOES happen in early December.
  15. Lol exactly. Some folks have such skewed memories/or ideas about what happens and what used to happen. I don’t ever get Kev’s take on any of that stuff...it’s just so inaccurate, and downright misleading.
  16. Ya that’s perfect for us Western peeps...cmon Canadian.
  17. Any graphics from the CMC..qpf/Snow amounts,
  18. Lol the NAM goes nuts, and everything else loses continuity.
  19. Looks good. But shouldn’t the dates be 12/1-12/3 instead?
  20. It’s all good. If we get siggy snow on December 1st and 2nd...who cares if PF gets in on it too. The more the merrier. Have at it. The congrats this and that can get a lil much after a while.
  21. I think that is a very reasonable first call...
  22. This morning you were saying how epic it was going to be there? Getting cold feet?
×
×
  • Create New...