Feb 18 CWG article on next week's storm

[usedtobe]

Still too early to make a call on the storm though the pattern still isn't a great one for getting a snowstorm.  The models may continue to jump around with their tracks over the next few runs..

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/02/18/still-no-model-consensus-on-possible-winter-storm-next-week-rain-or-snow-possible/

[The Dude]

Nice write-up, Wes.

 

If only every storm were as easy to forecast as the January blizzard...

[ThreeRedheads]

Wes,

 

So much uncertainty!  I'm sure it makes it difficult for your write up, but you did a great job explaining the different models and scenarios.

 

I don't have the link for the plume diagram you posted.  Do you have the URL?  Thanks!

[usedtobe]

Wes,

 

So much uncertainty!  I'm sure it makes it difficult for your write up, but you did a great job explaining the different models and scenarios.

 

I don't have the link for the plume diagram you posted.  Do you have the URL?  Thanks!

Here's the site it's from, you can pick the site,  I usually use Sterling or occasionally BWI and pick whether you want the GEFS or SREF.  I used the GEFS in the article.  Last night's model runs have made today's article easier. 

 

http://cms.met.psu.edu/sref/ensembles/Plumes.html

[ThreeRedheads]

Here's the site it's from, you can pick the site,  I usually use Sterling or occasionally BWI and pick whether you want the GEFS or SREF.  I used the GEFS in the article.  Last night's model runs have made today's article easier. 

 

http://cms.met.psu.edu/sref/ensembles/Plumes.html

Thanks, Wes!