Jump to content

lookingnorth

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    462
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lookingnorth

  1. In OKC we're having what would be average for Dallas, with a grand total of 9.6" of snow and four days of snow cover since March of 2015. Wait that's actually below normal even for Dallas. Lol. Tulsa's doing even worse than us, and they even average slightly more snow.

    Springfield is also having snow amounts that are more in line with normal for Little Rock, and Wichita is having what would be considered below-normal years in OKC.

  2. I just wanna pop in from Oklahoma and say that we've been doing poorly in the snow department as well. Oklahoma City averages 8" of snow a winter and has only gotten 9.5" total since March 2015. That's more like what you'd expect from a place like Dallas.

    And the past two winters had below-normal temperatures, so we've just had a lot of dry, windy cold, which is annoying

  3. On 11/11/2019 at 4:40 PM, LibertyBell said:

    It did?  As far as I'm aware the coldest temp ever recorded in the lower 48 is still -70 at Wolf Creek Pass.

     

    Did you not read that it was just a record for October.

    • Like 1
  4. On 11/6/2019 at 10:08 AM, Typhoon Tip said:

    And I want folks to note that cool relative offset region over N/A. 

    I've noted some 2/3rd of the months since 2000 have features a relative cool region somewhere over our continent, and more the majority of that ~ 2/3rd have had said region over SE Canada and NE conus regions.  

    It's enabling in a way...  We are still in the top 3 contributors to anthropogenic gassing off all industrial peers on the planet, and we are consummately being protected from the "edge" extremes of warming.

    I wonder how much longer that will last. I do find it interesting how every month from July 2018 to now except September 2019 has been below normal in OKC, yet the planet as a whole is experiencing near-record to record warmth.

    • Like 1
  5. 7 hours ago, bluewave said:

    10k daily NSIDC extent decline moves 2019 into 3rd place place on 9-15. Only 6k behind the 2nd place 2007.

    Currently in 3rd place for NSIDC extent. 

    3.387....2012-9-17

    4.155....2007-9-18

    4.161....2019

    4.165....2016-9-10

    4.344....2011-9-11

    4.433....2015-9-9

    4.586....2008-9-19

    4.615....2010-9-21

    4.656....2018-9-23

    4.665....2017-9-13

    What's the margin of error for these measurements? Is there any significant difference between the 2007, 2016, and 2019 extents or is it a statistical tie?

  6. 7 hours ago, bluewave said:

    One of the largest NSIDC daily extent losses for the month of September on the 4th. The 112 k daily drop moves 2019 into 4th place. The late August stall followed by accelerated losses is a first for the post 2007 Arctic. It shows how volatile the Arctic pressure patterns have become.

    ftp://sidads.colorado.edu/DATASETS/NOAA/G02135/seaice_analysis/Sea_Ice_Index_Daily_Extent_G02135_v3.0.xlsx

    3.387....2012-9-17

    4.155....2007-9-18

    4.165....2016-9-10

    4.286.....2019

    4.344....2011-9-11

    4.433....2015-9-9

    4.586....2018-9-23

    4.615....2010-9-21

     4.656....2018-9-23

    4.665....2017-9-13

    Why is 2018 in there twice?

  7. Bluewave hasn't updated for today, so I'll mention that it looks like 2019 is having a bit of trouble falling below 5 million on the extent value.

    NSIDC extent

    Date.....2012......2019........2019 difference 

    8-4.......5.990.... .5.762.....+228k lead 

    8-5.......5.768......5.596.....+172k lead

    8-6.......5.632......5.510......+122k lead

    8-7.......5.467......5.388......+79k lead

    8-8.......5.256.....5.390......-134k behind

    8-9.......5.088......5.259......-171k behind

    8-10.....5.118......5.093......+25k ahead

    8-11.....5.021......5.113.......-92k behind

    8-12.....4.938......5.063.......-125k behind

    8-13.....4.889

    8-14.....4.724

    8-15.....4.679

    8-16.....4.619

    8-17.....4.545

    8-18.....4.520

    8-19.....4.405

    8-20.....4.313

  8. 9 hours ago, bluewave said:

    NSIDC extent held steady on August 8th. 2019 has fallen behind 2012 by 134 k during the period of the Great Arctic Cyclone. 2019 needs an average daily loss rate of 123k next few days to hold even with 2012 by the 11th. The weather will determine if 2019 can catch up with 2012 again. But this was the period when 2012 pulled ahead of all other years.

    NSIDC extent

       Date....2012......2019....2019 difference 

    8-4......5.990.... .5.762.....+228k lead 

    8-5......5.768......5.596.....+172k lead

    8-6......5.632......5.510......+122k lead

    8-7......5.467......5.388......+79k lead

     8-8......5.256.....5.390......-134k behind

    8-9......5.088

    8-10....5.118

     8-11....5.021

    When I go to the NSIDC website I get different numbers that are higher for both years so I'm confused. I'm using the Charctic tool to view the data.

  9. 20 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

    I agree with the low chance of beating 2012 at this point. I wanted to see a pretty good sized lead heading into late July/early August. 

    I might go higher than 3% on extent but not by a lot. Maybe 10-20%. 

    For area I probably wouldn't go higher though as we slightly trail 2012 in area. 

    What would you say the odds are of beating 2007 or 2016?

  10. Sorry if this has been covered elsewhere in this forum, but is there a good place for me to learn about Arctic ice melt forecasting?

    I hear you guys talking about a dipole a lot, and I would guess that that means high pressure in one place and low pressure in another place, but what does that mean for melting exactly?

×
×
  • Create New...