natedizel

I like bologna

2 hours ago, Boston Bulldog said:

Marie is going into beast mode right now

Beast mode still won't get the ball at the 1 yard line and thats ok. I'm a pats fan.

1 hour ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

Scooter has been having trouble realizing the SE mass Drought didn't get much of a dent at all and the "chances" in the near future look weak. I've just been reading the forum the last few days and not commenting but i've found that he's trying too hard almost like Cranky when he's a bit off. Hi Scott Lol Just what i'm reading from  you...total disdain for complaining that a rain event that looked like 1.5-2.00 got cut by 75%, citing chances in a medium term full of question marks... almost like in the winter When PF posts his latest 6" Moose fart snow fall and  has 300" at picnic tables and your waiting on the first storm that doesn't change over.  SE mass has a Legit gripe. 

Moose fart

4 hours ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

You still wouldn't want long lines or crowds of people waiting to get into a club or concert because that is a recipe for easy spread.

Well it wouldn't really be that more crowded then a supermarket line. 30 second test then next person

1 hour ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

And schools.     This would help a ton 

Ya. I remember having a drug test done years ago that was a mouth swab and it only took a minute. If it would be possible

7 hours ago, powderfreak said:

I want that.  We decided to get my wife tested tomorrow.  She can’t work until the results come back and they said likely by Tuesday sometime. 4 days to find out up here.  She truly just feels like a head cold, nothing in the chest (ha, in another context that sounds bad to say about the wife).  But everyone looks at you side eyed if you have the sniffles and voice sounds stuffy, so we are just going to do it despite the PCP saying it’s not a requirement and up to her.

Going to be a long winter for head colds if that’s what it is.

What we need is some sort of better rapid swab test. Results in minute or something. All bars and concerts could open up and go on. You positive you cant enter. It would be like a bag check/metal detector line.

Lol

On 9/10/2020 at 2:37 PM, the ghost of leroy said:

Hey, are you still accepting donations? I made some money on Tesla and want to toss you a g or two. 

Can I get some. IL be your best friend

24 minutes ago, Windspeed said:

I wasn't referring to nuking a hurricane. That in itself is ridiculous. I was referring to the discussion that delved more into storm manipulation by whatever technological means available. There would be consequences and liability issues.

 

Just to be clear, I am not saying we yet have any such capability / technological advancement to manipulate a hurricane or large weather system. It's merely speculation within the confines of a hypothetical what if scenario. The cloud seeding projects in the past might still be all we've managed to experiment with any success or failure.

 

 

I remember reading an article where some scientist dropped some powder or spray from a plane. Supposedly it actually dried up a doppler thunderstorm.

3 hours ago, Windspeed said:

4 hours ago, natedizel said:

Ya thats pretty much why not much has been done/tried.
China can play with a virus thoe. Might as well try something to.

Ya well we're not going off topic and none of this is proven, only speculation. But I am pretty damn certain that if it could be proven that you redirected a macro-level atmospheric system that caused immense human suffering elsewhere, you're opening up a can of worms no financial institution wants to eat. Nothing withstanding the global ramifications and possible resulting sanctions or war.

3 hours ago, Windspeed said:

Liability is a bitch.

Your taking it to serious. No one is gonna nuke a hurricane. 

2 minutes ago, Windspeed said:

Simply put, it's too much airmass to manipulate. And here is the catch 2020. Excuse the pun. Let's say you successfully manipulate a storm. At that point you are responsible for it. If the diversion of this atmospheric phenomenon creates another atmospheric phenomenon that wipes out a city, much less kills a bunch of folks, then it's no longer an Act of God, but a result of your screw up.

Ya thats pretty much why not much has been done/tried.

China can play with a virus thoe. Might as well try something to.

The entire nuclear Arsenal maybe a bit much for it. The blast would have to disrupt the clouds and circulation.  

It would probably just reintensfy later thoe

3 minutes ago, the ghost of leroy said:

You gotta nip it in the bud. Encourage more deforestation in Africa. More SAL, weaker AEW’s, fewer storms. Clean up the homegrown systems by using a space based laser system to warm the cloud tops. 

Get giant fans and just spew SAL all over the atlantic.

2 hours ago, the ghost of leroy said:

Which of these is going to do anything?

2 hours ago, the ghost of leroy said:

BUST

Why does it have to do anything? It's a storm we can track.

5 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Oh, mine are all nicknames too. But at what point does the nickname become the name? 

I have no idea where the names come from haha. 

They should of used Papa or Pepe for the P name

5 hours ago, WxWatcher007 said:

You said it earlier. It might be too much to ask. It might be time to upgrade the recon fleet.

We could go without a couple new F-22 Raptors, right?

A family member i have works on those. The mechanics nicknamed those. "The Craptors" cause they always in the shop.

5 hours ago, Windspeed said:

Josephine's low-level center has finally succumbed to strong southwesterly shear and convection is now decoupled.

Ya that shear really blew her skirt off.

6 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

Honesty great map

I have not seen 1 station call for that much snow in central rhode island or even coastal areas.