Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    64,373
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. I actually hope I'm wrong, so don't jump down my throat. Anyway, sfc freezing like made a move S and E toward the area vs 18z...I'm at 69...heh
  2. heights in the most important part are not lower...compare the h5 maps between 18z and 0z. Ill die on that hill. Maybe a met can solve. 60 vs 66. If I'm wrong, I'll admit it, no problem.
  3. Theres some light precip at 54 with what looks like CAD, with shallow cold but won't hold.
  4. I am. Let's see what happens. Lower heights should allow the cold to press in a little quicker
  5. Can't totally agree with that. I know where you're looking..I'm looking at our latitude and north. We'll see
  6. Looking at the H5 on the NAM, can't say I'm encouraged. Heights slightly higher at 30
  7. Where are the SREF people? It's not a real future fail without those being brought out.
  8. Got a thread in the chamber, with a New England style title and everything. Check for it shortly.
  9. Usually when the GFS doubles down against all the other models it ends up right. lol no it doesn’t. Just saying a weenie hope-ium
  10. I'm really doing pbp on the 72 hour NAM. I need stronger edibles tonight.
  11. Definitely further S and E of 12z run tho...still not quite GFS tho. So maybe we got a legit trend here?
  12. lol, NAM has a small sliver of CAD still hanging on at 63.. no other model has that. Don't think it means much tho...it';s shrinking and the surge from the SW is gonna kill it.
  13. 18z NAM is in between it's 12z run and 12z GFS with position of sfc freezing line
  14. We gotta see trends man! Yall are gonna be on your own for 18z...gym time.
  15. Yeah, because as well all know, it's prudent to mention a significant ice storm 90 hours out when only one model is showing it.
  16. There is where I fake like I'm not checking every single NAM panel rn.
×
×
  • Create New...