Jump to content

AppsRunner

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    2,420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by AppsRunner

  1. Haven’t looked at too many soundings but the 3kNAM does have a MAUL in the trowal and some ridiculous rates.

    Some of the model output seems very unrealistic. The NAM and even the Euro/GFS are forecasting nearly impossible rates. The Euro has 1” of QPF falling in 6 hours, and the NAM more. Even the GFS/FV3 have high QPF amounts in that band. It’s going to be absolutely fascinating to watch unfold. I might end up taking a drive out if its within a couple counties.  

  2. sn10_006h.us_mw.png

    Yeah so I'm going to go ahead and say that Ames is not going to see 17.3" of snow in 6 hours (and it's still snowing). But I can dream, right? 

    Most of the models point to someone between Sioux Falls and Davenport having a lot of fun in a blizzard, but it's likely to be an extremely narrow corridor. 

  3. 10 hours ago, OHweather said:

    I think a swath of moderate snow (3-6”) is likely across a good portion of central and southern Ohio...

    All signs point to a boatload of QPF with outstanding upper level divergence, high PWATs advecting in, very strong low to mid level warm air advection and isentropic lift, and strong frontogensis.  

    Question mark is obviously ptype.  With plenty of room to wet bulb cool as the precip arrives and what should be very strong lift, think it’s likely most areas north of the Ohio River flip to a few hours of snow...though it may initially start as sleet and surface temps won’t be that cold.  Strong lift will slow the advance of the mixing for a time, though with how strong the WAA is it will eventually overwhelm, so it may be hard for anyone to see more than 4-6 hours of all snow.  

    Given the sensitivity to temps and rates here, hard to be very confident in big snows for a large area.  I think there’s enough juice for warning criteria somewhere but it may be the exception rather than the rule.  The low and mid levels aren’t that cold so it will be a wet snow.  I’d like to see model soundings show a better “cross hair signature” (lift in the snow growth zone) for better confidence in 6”+ snow.  Right now the idea of a few hours of moderate to heavy QPF as snow but with questionable ratios limits how aggressive I can go to 3-6”, but it could be an exciting 3-6” and there is some boom potential.  My guess is the jackpot may be central and east central Ohio. 

    Either way it’s tricky and though I’m fairly optimistic for someone to get a decent thump, trends during the day Tuesday leading up will make or break it. 

    11

    How's this one?

    nam_2019021912_021_40.17--83_33.thumb.png.290669f71ef1cdeade9b83a26d353b8d.png

    Obviously very marginal thermals below 850, but I'd favor a zone of 3-6" wherever they can hold on to snow long enough. The NAM is obviously overdone, but something like the 3km NAM doesn't seem too far fetched. 

  4. Looks like another good event for Iowa. Kinda similar today with a heavy burst for a few hours. 

    Havent looked too far in depth but the NAM soundings were even better than today with a deeper DGZ and better lift throughout. 

    DMX already going with 4-6” 

    • Like 1
  5. I'll set the over/under for 6.0" here. It's not going to be overly impressive snow growth but the DGZ is pretty deep for the first 12 hours with modest lift throughout. Based on how "fluffy" the last event was, I'd expect something fairly similar again (but with more QPF). 

    • Like 1
  6. 7 hours ago, CNY-LES FREAK said:

    Once again, an advisory for the Eastern Lake Ontario Region, what does that mean exactly? I wont see a 1/2" from whatever comes through tonight so why are we under a WWA, seriously though, what's the reason this time KBUF?

    Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
     

    Because BUF issues for the entire county, which includes 8NNW Redfield. Don't blame the folks at BUF

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...