Jump to content

StormChazer

Members
  • Posts

    1,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by StormChazer

  1. 9 minutes ago, ouamber said:

    Hey Everybody!! Been a long time since we've had something good to watch!! Love reading all your posts! Fingers crossed for Tulsa..we've been screwed the last several years! Don't even get me started on that "Magical Snowless Donut Hole" over Tulsa last year! LOL! (Insert facepalm) Hopefully we can all cash in with the cold air in place over the next few weeks! But Gosh...that 64 degrees outside feels pretty darn amazing right now! RIP to my plants tonight!

    I simply will never forget the snow hole for as long as I live. We had someone here from Mexico for work who had never seen snow, and I promised her she would that night. Then the donut happened. 
     

    Still, I think the floor on this storm is 2 inches, with a really high ceiling of 10.

    • Like 2
  2. 22 minutes ago, The Waterboy said:

    18z GFS and ICON were both better than I expected after the Euro debacle.  We’ll take it for now.  
    I know there’s a lot of talk about suppression pushing it further south.  Maybe this does the typical model NW shift???  Although that seems to happen more with cutters.  Overall happy to see models hold steady-ish and give a middle finger to the Euro. 

    Preach!!!

     

    Edit: Actually, the icon cut totals by about half and dries up central and west OK.

  3. Tulsa discussion.

     

    This storm will
    entrain healthy moisture levels for such a cold airmass, setting the
    stage for a potentially high impact snow storm for much of the
    area.
    
    As the upper level feature approaches it will induce solid mid
    level ascent over the area, over the top of an area already seeing
    good isentropic lift along the slope of the arctic airmass. Model
    guidance generally shows a range of 0.2 to 0.5" QPF. Forecast
    soundings show the entire lower atmosphere below 500 hPa in the
    DGZ and saturated. These factors should support extreme snow
    ratios of 20-1 or so. This certainly suggests the potential for a
    high impact snow event of 4" or greater for most of the CWA.
    However, the most recent 12z guidance uniformly decreased expected
    totals somewhat. In fact the drier models scarcely showed 2" of
    snow accumulation for a lot of the area. While impactful, this
    would not be nearly as problematic. This leaves us in a watch and
    wait position as some of the forecast uncertainties hopefully
    decline over the next day or two. With this in mind, anybody
    reading this should prepare now for several days of extreme cold
    and possibly travel impacts as well.”
    • Like 1
  4. 9 minutes ago, MUWX said:

    SGF zone forecast for Greene county calls for “heavy snow accumulation” Sunday. Don’t recall seeing that before. 

    NWS in Tulsa said this.

    Snow chances will begin to increase
    again during the daytime Sunday as both ensembles and
    deterministic models have been fairly persistent showing a couple
    of shortwave troughs moving across the Southern/Central Plains
    late this weekend and early next week. The first round of snow
    arrives late morning/early afternoon on Sunday and lasts through
    Sunday night or early Monday morning. Models show another round of
    light-moderate snow, associated with a second shortwave trough,
    late Monday morning. There is still lots of uncertainty with how
    these scenarios will evolve, but confidence has increased some
    for a more impactful snow event for Sunday and Monday, especially
    for northeast OK and far northwest AR/Ozarks area. Will continue
    to closely monitor and update the forecast
  5. Here, have some members.

    My breakdown..

    Roughly 14 of these models drop 6+ inches of snow here in Tulsa, double that due to ratios.

    If one of these solutions pan out, we are looking at some major snowfall, and 28% of the members showing that is nothing to sneeze at.

    Am I being a weenie?:weenie: Yes, but it's backed up by data :mapsnow:haha.

     

    1705406400-KoroD5fkgYE.png

    1705406400-zzOXZ3OcFTg.png

     

    • Thanks 2
  6. Euro looks different from previous run, but still outputs a similar solution. Main differences being that the storm is slower by about 6 hours and totals aren't as high in SW MO and central and NW AR. Also Western OK really gets in on the action. Either way, doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the consensus that is developing. A broad area of precip will move over the area and produce good snow thanks to high ratios.

    I know we will still wiggle around north and south between now and Sunday, but I feel like this is more or less our solution with some massaging to do. I don't see the snow being pulled out from under our feet with this type of setup.

    1705330800-kMx32HIrczM.png

    1705330800-TWTf1r1Jy9M.png

    1705330800-0joGi0ac6qI.png

  7. 24 minutes ago, rockchalk83 said:

    A little concerned the ensembles remain drier than the operational runs and we see a drying trend in the operational models over the next couple of days. Especially with the volume of cold air coming. 

    Either way, dangerous weather is coming with the combo of dangerous cold and atleast some snow.

    For what it’s worth, the 06Z Euro ensemble trended much wetter than the 0Z. So it increased amounts. I’ll post a map when I’m in front of my computer.

    • Like 3
  8. Euro keeps Sunday/Monday event alive and well.(With a nasty ice storm in DFW)

    The system doesn't dig as much as the 0Z run, but it doesn't make much of a difference in the output.

    Slow moving on this run, so it's nearly 24 hours of snow, in 10 degrees the entire time.

    Almost everyone here gets a around a foot(NW AR and SW MO need to take off 3-5 inches from this since it is including Friday's storm.

    1705428000-FjkqeyuJqf8.png

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...