Jump to content

WxMan1

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    765
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by WxMan1

  1.  

    What irks me about all of this is here we are, 2025, and the global models still struggle consistently locking in with a system for 5+ days out during the winter. At least, one that's going to involve snow for the DMV. 

     

    Rain storms April through November? No problem. It always seems that the models are generally in better agreement. Whether It's split flow, northern and southern stream contributions, amplified waves or not. Same sampling issues, or lack thereof, that we have with winter storm tracks here in the East. Can't figure it out, unless it's just anecdotal on my part.

    This is where I thought AI would help, and maybe to some extent it is. But even the EC AIFS has bounced around with solutions between days 4-7.

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • 100% 3
  2. 37 minutes ago, usedtobe said:

    I worked that storm and if you look at the 500h it was a lot different than the projected storm.  It had a much stronger southern stream trough displaced farther south than this one.  It was a cold event and one where the models were late in forecasting it to come far enough n to hit DC. 

    Remember that well. It was on the heels of the Thursday, January 22 1987 storm. It was also Super Bowl Sunday, Sunday, Jan 26th. Broncos vs the Giants, SB21. Started snowing late in the AM and was heaviest during the evening. 

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  3. While there's no doubt reason to doubt, just remember what so many of you said, including PSU Hoffman...

    In terms of the pattern, in terms of the teleconnections, it was all about Feb 20th-ish for a long time now. Nothing has changed. That was talked about even before this past snow event. THIS was potentially the bigger prize because of the phasing and tucked in low track off the  coast. Nothing has changed in that regard. 

    Enjoy the ride!

    • Like 17
  4. 36/33 with rain and some mangled snowflakes mixed in. I know we were given the Canadian runs some crap (including the high res), But it had the right idea with rain or a mix for a while to start here in the immediate DC metro. My bar is 2". If we can get that, terrific. Wouldn't be surprised for 1-1.5" though. 

  5. 22 minutes ago, H2O said:

    I'm going 2" top end just because there is too much gradient along 95 on most models.  I've lived here too long to get high off hopium models that show more.  I'll be happy to see flakes regardless.  Its just fun to make fun of my area that is worse than DCA at times.  

    cyan of sadness, mauve of melancholy, flesh tone of futility.  All good color choices.

    2" is my bar here in central AA County. Again, I want a least a decent coating of fresh insulating snow before the deep freeze during the week. A snowpack can mitigate deep frost depths and frozen water lines, and as a homeowner, yes to this please!

    • Like 6
  6. 15 minutes ago, dailylurker said:

    Well get our band of heavy wet snow as it pulls ne and crushes NYC. 2-3" within a couple hours could be fun. This is mother nature putting snow where it's been pretty bad this season. Our area is coming close to climo even with 2-3 and it's only mid January. 

    Yeah, my bar for mid AA (Crofton area) is 2-3" as well. Feel like the boom around here is now more than 4", which is fine with me since I'll be shoveling it. :)

    The key however is to get at least some snow. Before we get highs in the teens and lows in the single digits (or lower), I would like at least a fresh blanket of insulating snow to mitigate deepening frost depths and the potential problems therein. Don't need any frozen pipes, thank you very much!

    • Like 4
  7. 2 minutes ago, Weather Will said:

    WB 18Z 3k NAM at 5pm Mon. not over yet.

    IMG_4829.png

    IMG_4830.png

    Hints of W-E banding in those 10+ inch stripes...within one band in a historically favored area (along I-70). Me thinks the disparity will be a little more in reality. As in, 7-8" vs. 10-11"+ within those bands. Good to see the latest NAM Nest depict what I think could be reality; we all just hope in our back yards we're not in between bands. 

    Then again, that's being greedy, no? :D

    • Haha 2
  8. Latest from the NWS' experimental Probabilistic Precipitation Portal (https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/Prob_Precip/). 

    Granted, there will undoubtedly be a sharper gradient with the higher amounts, with lesser amounts on either side of the best FGEN banding, but it does look like most of the forum will get at least 6". That's what I'm hoping for -- and I'm glad to see those 6" probs went up near the M/D line (to 65-70%). 8"+ probs are 45-50% now near the M/D line (also up from previous model cycle), while IMBY here in central AA County up to around 67%. Meanwhile, 12" probs went up IMBY towards Annapolis as well (now 35-40%), no doubt given the robust 12Z high-res CAM guidance. Still thinking 7-9" as a 'mode' for a large chunk of the immediate metro region. Some areas maybe less (farther north), obviously those underneath the best bands have a better chance of hitting 10-11+ inches given the better (deeper) ascent within the dendritic growth layer. 

    More about the membership in this ensemble, which uses the NDFD snow forecast as the 'mode' of the distribution: 

    Welcome to the Probabilistic Precipitation Portal, a resource provided by the National Weather Service to communicate the range and probability of possible precipitation amounts over the next 72 hours (3 days).

    Data on this page come from the Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (PQPF) and the Probabilistic Winter Precipitation Forecast (PWPF), which are updated twice daily at the Weather Prediction Center. These probabilistic forecasts are derived from a blend of the following:

    • 10 members from the NCEP GEFS ensemble
    • 25 members from the ECMWF ensemble
    • 10 members from the Canadian ensemble
    • 1 member from the NCEP SREF NMMB
    • 2 most recent runs of the NCEP HRRR model
    • 2 most recent runs of the Canadian Regional Model
    • 2 most recent runs of the NCEP NAM 3km CONUS Nest model
    • 4 NCEP Hi-res WRF-ARW model runs
    • NCEP Hi-res FV3LAM model
    • NCEP GFS model
    • ECMWF deterministic model
    • NCEP GEFS ensemble mean
    • NDFD forecast

    This page updates each hour, typically at 25 minutes past the hour.

    Screenshot (11).png

    Screenshot (13).png

    Screenshot (14).png

    Screenshot (15).png

    • Like 10
    • Thanks 2
  9. 6 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

    Wxman1 is a favorite of mine.  The name says it all.  Number 1.  He knows shit. 

    Well, I thank you. There really are some excellent mets on this board, and it has been great following and keeping in touch with them and all the weather enthusiasts for well over a decade now. Heck even during the Eastern US Wx board days. 

    Let me just add... collectively we are essentially a ML/AI model. So much experience in this room, we've seen it all, or just about, in the last couple of decades. That really helps forecasting events like this. 

    Think the mean and mode for the immediate metro region will be 6-8", maybe 7-9". That's what the probabilistic maps are suggesting. Certainly 10-11" will be possible wherever that FGEN band sets up later Monday. Maybe along Rte 50, though probably south. Either way, some cold smoke coming, at the right perfect time of year climatically speaking. 

    Enjoy it everyone!

    • Like 21
    • Thanks 4
    • Weenie 1
    • 100% 4
    • clap 2
  10. 3 minutes ago, winter_warlock said:

    I don't think I've ever seen the icon mentioned lol

    Yeah the ICON is rarely part of any of our blends (especially QPF) at WPC. Verification numbers just don't justify it. Including the NAM12 outside of 48-60 hours, and the NAM Nest outside of 24-36 hours. UKMet is one that cannot be totally discounted (it did nail the Binghamton NY 40"+ snow event a few years back), but I really wish we (at NCEP) could get a hold of their ensemble suite.  

    Obviously, the op ECMWF cannot be discounted (never can), but at least until tonight's runs, I'd still put more credence in the EC ensemble mean. I'm thinking (hoping?) the 12Z ECMWF is the 'low end' for those of us in the metro region north. 

    Still think 6" is a good bar for DC and immediate metro. Interesting that DCA could very well make out better than BWI (how often does that happen?)

    • Like 8
    • Thanks 5
  11. 1 hour ago, MillvilleWx said:

    You and I know that likely won’t happen, but I like where we are for this event. There’s growing consensus on some really solid 85H FGEN across our hood. Plus we are further east than the fall line so MIGHT get a little help on the transfer fun as noted by some of the globals. I’m not expecting a jackpot by any means, but it’s a good situation for us! 

    Scott -- It seems our last 3 events (both last year, and the one in 2022) were these similar W-E cutters with strong frontogenetic support. Areas along and south of the beltway seemed to do very well, especially South Anne Arundel into Calvert County and I believe (for the '22 event) even Fredericksburg. 

    Last year we did quite well in Crofton -Bowie -- 4.1" for the first event, and another 4-5" with the second. All in one week. Our one week of winter, lol. 

    • Like 8
  12. 11 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

    I ran out of reactions to give, but I appreciate the sentiment. Include @wxmvpetefrom now on. He’s an incredible Met and a great friend. Went to Millersville together for a time and work together at WPC. Amazing mind for winter weather and analysis. We’ve been looking forward to a day like this for a long time. It’s been a nice storm so far and will only continue to crank overnight. 

    Very happy to work with these guys at WPC. And to you Scott and Pete: Perfect timing for 3 days off! Yeah baby! :)

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...