catoctin wx

If you love your job, you will never work a day in your life. I would recommend (and reiterate what many many others have said in this thread) that you diversify your degree. If you major in metereorology, see if you can minor in math, or computor science, or oceanography, or anything else. It will be hard, but worth it

When I was at Millersville there wasn't a forecasting class (don't see one listed in the couse list). I don't forecast for a living now, but I was involved with the campus weather service for 8 semesters. It involved map discussions and short and medium range forecasting for 3 shifts each day. we also gained a little forecasting experience through our meso class

when there is a will there is a way man. I did horrible in my college math courses, just scraping through on the curve or a decent grade on the final. I eventually failed calc 3 and retook it over the summer and got a C+. I took calc 1 in the spring semester my freshman year and got a C. That summer I went home and took it at a community college, not for a better grade, but to relearn the material so that I could do better in calc 2. I also found tutors and a great study group to work with. It can be done, just don't get discouraged

I guess I am the exception to this. I always liked the weather, but I never considered it a career option until my junior year of HS. Until I took a 1/2 year course on it, I was planning on going into early childhood education

I should have also mentioned that I applied to SUNY Albany, Wisconsin, and NC State and I didn't get into any of them.

agree completely on the first paragraph. The classes that were rehashing some of the older stuff, just in more detail (dynamics, thermo, synoptic, etc) were pretty easy. The ones that were totally new (Satellite and Remote Sensing, 2 tough radiation courses) were a struggle. I don't mind posting my GPA for both. Admittedly I did not do that well in undergrad. I got my ass severly kicked by the math department. I ended up with a 2.81 total GPA and something a bit higher for my in-major GPA (can't seem to pull that one up online). I got into grad school not on my grades, but on my networking skills. Some friends set me up with some meetings for grad school advisors at an AMS meeting and I was able to impress one enough in person to accept me into the program. I finished my grad school with a 3.69 GPA.

in my experience, the classes just go deeper into the material, but by then you have such a good grasp on the topics that it really isn't that new. The material is harder than undergrad, but because you have seen most of it already, you are able to do better. Also, many undergrad classes (especially in the first 2 years) are weed-out courses. In grad school the profs are really good about helping you out and making sure that you succeed.

graduate courses are a joke compared to what you are put through in an undergraduate curriculum. Also, as you know, the calc courses offered by the math department is much different then the actual applied equations of an advanced level met course. Of course the theory is the same, but when it is actually applied to something that makes physical sense (as opposed to just solving problems), it is much easier. FWIW, i sucked horribly in my undergraduate math classes, but was able to maintain decent grades in my met courses. Went on for my masters and my GPA went up by a full point.