Jump to content

H2O

Members
  • Posts

    38,381
  • Joined

Posts posted by H2O

  1. I generally keep my dumb thoughts to myself(cause I’m more wrong than right) but this is why I kept stressing a -NAO and have it more west based. Think of it like a wreck on the beltway before the 270 split. Only after you see how bad the wreck is will you then find out how bad traffic snarls and jams up. You gotta get the block first. Then let it jam up the flow. NAO or AO too far east lets too much traffic find other ways to escape.  

    This storm might not be it. But if it helps keep things jammed then look for the next one. 

    • Like 9
  2. I don’t think the models will know until the storm hits the coast and gets sampled better. Tomorrows NAM will be the first to show at 84hrs. Until then we just won’t know. Unless we see more birds flying north. But not northeast. That’s bad. If we see wooly caterpillars flying north that’s REALLY bad

    • Like 3
    • Haha 7
    • clap 1
  3. @Bob Chilli should have caveat’d to say so far this winter GFS has done better with NAO vs AO. 

    Obviously both being neg is preferable but I guess I like NAO more cause it jams up the ATL closer to us which for me means HPs can’t slide east so quick. We’ve had AOs be neg but be in locations that don’t help as much. 
     

    Basically I want anything that gives us snow. AO, NAO, PNA, WPO, DIY, WTF, SOS. Gnat farts in Mongolia work too

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
  4. 24 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

    Yup.  That's hanging in the back of my mind.  It's keeping me from being super pumped about any of this.  I'm in a weird space of happy, but ready to accept probably failure.

    It might work out, it might not. I have 70/30 fail to win ratio. 
     

    Until it starts we just won’t know

×
×
  • Create New...