Search the Community
Showing results for 'deniers' in content posted by ChescoWx.
Found 11 results
-
Below shows the clear impact of the introduced altered NCEI adjustments to the below May actual average temperatures for Chester County PA. To put a fine point on the below analysis. Incredibly NCEI chose to chill 73 of the first 76 years or 96% of all May months in the years from 1895 through 1970! They have now over the last 54 years 1971 through 2024 chosen to warm the data in 40 of those 54 years or 74% of these years. This is a textbook example of how altering the data helps give the desired answer to assist the many Cyclical Climate Deniers. That blue actual average temperature line is actually cooling while the red altered data is clearly warming.....
-
For all of you Cyclical Climate Deniers - where is that warming??
-
When alarmist and cyclical climate deniers start using words like "unprecedented"....and then we as always find it has indeed happened before....we all understand the lack of reality that has now injected itself and crept into the very reality that is our constantly changing climate!! Amazing!!
-
There continues to be an alarming rise in natural climate change deniers!! LOL!
-
There continues to be an alarming rise in dust bowl heatwave deniers....they continue to attempt to use altered adjusted data to chill that historical heat. While reviewing all of the post hoc data adjustments details for the long term Chester County PA stations I found plenty of missing data points for both West Chester and Phoenixville.. I have included their raw unaltered data for the below summertime average temperature historical review of the years these deniers focus on most 1930's thru 1950's. Below is a comparison of the actual raw data along with the significant cooling adjustment following NCEI adjustments. Coatesville individual post hoc site NCEI altered average summertime temperatures are in red. Chester County PA NCEI county wide altered average temperature following NCEI adjustments are in purple. Of note, as I dove into the handwritten observations for Coatesville there appears to be no need for time of observation adjustments for Coatesville, During the time frame of all of these significant cooling adjustments the time of observation for Coatesville was taken by the observer at the following times. 1930 thru 1942 at both 8am and 8pm; from 1942-1945 it was 8pm. After 1945 it was taken at 8am.
-
A refresher for those considering joining the dust bowl heatwave deniers. Showing how Chester County like most of the USA experienced summers hotter than we have experienced since...even in our current warming cycle of climate change. https://arcfieldweather.com/blog/2024/7/3/the-deadly-heat-wave-of-july-1936in-the-middle-of-one-of-the-hottest-summers-on-recordin-the-middle-of-one-of-the-hottest-decades-ever
-
It's more a passion than a job for my team! My human resource team includes a checkbox on the intake form that actually asks the following question (this is directly lifted from the form) Do you believe in climate change (yes) (no) If they answer no and are a self identified climate denier - my HR Director immediately puts them in the left pile (left does not move forward in the process) We refuse to hire climate deniers as climate change is real and of course a stone cold fact!!
-
As always climate alarmists/cycle deniers like above only show data since 1970. However, if we review and analyze the actual readings going back to the 1890's...we clearly do not support any significant warming at all!!. As we can easily see in analyzing the actual un-adjusted long term data for the 1st ~90 years of data (1894-1982) vs. the last ~40 years of data (1983-2022) - of course no such moves to a climate in Coatesville/Chester County like Philadelphia with only a 0.3 degree increase in the last 40 years vs the previous 90 years. In fact of course 6 months are trending warmer and 6 months have trended cooler!! Why do the cycle deniers fail to look at older data to see the true cycle and only cherry pick since 1970? My local ABC news outlet in Philly does the same trick..
-
Maybe If we could find any climate doomsday event(s) pushed by climate alarmists that actually has taken place and is attributable to climate change....like the above evaporating oceans or even rising oceans like the doomsday predictions of flooded Atlantic City casinos predicted by cycle deniers 30 years ago that have never come to pass. If there was actual real world events that we can point to maybe folks would accept it better?
-
So let's help the cycle deniers out and actually look at the comparison to Philadelphia long term data to a rural non UHI impacted data site like the Western Burbs of Philadelphia in Chester County PA....that trend in Philly is clearly accelerating out of control while back in the burbs....are temps rising at all???? Yet people continue to use PHL as their proof of warming....interesting... Also note how the decade of the 1930's was actually exactly the same temperature in Philadelphia as the 2000's - not much warming in those 70 years - is that why they don't look back further in history??
-
Some interesting quotes,thoughts and facts from both the book and a Wall Street Journal opinion https://www.wsj.com/articles/unsettled-review-theconsensus-on-climate-11619383653 Despite the expected predictable dismissal of the author by some on this forum already - the WSJ states "Mr. Koonin’s science credentials are impeccable—unlike, say, those of one well-known Swedish teenager to whom the media affords great attention on climate matters. He has been a professor of physics at Caltech and served as the top scientist in Barack Obama’s Energy Department. The book is copiously referenced and relies on widely accepted government documents. "Mr. Koonin (The book's author) is no “climate denier,” to use the concocted phrase used to shut down debate. The word “denier” is of course meant to associate skeptics of climate alarmism with Holocaust deniers." "Mr. Koonin is persuasively skeptical. It’s a big problem, he says, when models can’t retroactively “predict” events that have already happened. And he notes that some of the “tuning” done to models so that they work better amounts to “cooking the books.” "But science itself is not conducted by polls, regardless of how often we are urged to heed a “scientific consensus” on climate. As the science-trained novelist Michael Crichton summarized in a famous 2003 lecture at Caltech: “If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.” “Heat waves in the US are now no more common than they were in 1900” and “the warmest temperatures in the US have not risen in the past fifty years" "Humans have had no detectable impact on hurricanes over the past century" Greenland’s ice sheet isn’t shrinking any more rapidly today than it was eighty years ago" "But even if one remains unconvinced by his arguments, the right response is to debate the science. We’ll see if that happens in a world in which politicians assert the science is settled and plan astronomical levels of spending to replace the nation’s massive infrastructures with “green” alternatives. Never have so many spent so much public money on the basis of claims that are so unsettled. The prospects for a reasoned debate are not good. Good luck, Mr. Koonin."
