Jump to content

SleetStormNJ

Members
  • Posts

    730
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SleetStormNJ

  1. 8 minutes ago, Eduardo said:

    I didn't think it was possible until DC went through Snowmageddon in 09-10.  If they are susceptible to a blizzard parade, then so are we!  Here's to hoping!  :snowing:

    Whoops - 2009-2010 - that's right.

     

    We did well in both those winters too - but DC cashed in big on the Dec '09 and then again in the 1st week of February and even got in on action a bit in the one we finally got hit with a week later.

     

  2. 5 minutes ago, Dark Star said:

    12" in Garwood, Central Union County NJ by 11:30AM.  Snow almost looked like a little semi melted refrozen flakes mixed in?  Anybody see an additional foot for this area?  Seems the most intense banding has worked inland.

    Not far from you and easily have 16-17 inches.  I think 12-16 more will be tough but can see an easy 6-10 more.

  3. Just now, SnowGoose69 said:

    This continues to look like 1983 in a 2021 climate.  The evolution of the storm itself isn’t really close to 83 at all but that easterly inflow jet is.  

    I'm impressed with the continued moisture transport/frontogenesis features - somebody is going to get clobbered.

  4. 7 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

    Guaranteed that snow Tuesday has some areas of decent rates in it.  It won’t be 1 plus an hour but typically those areas even in a system undergoing occlusion end up a bit better than modeled a lot of the time 

    I will say a lot of our big ones that were Miller Bs tend to have a signature of consistent/longer snow like this.  (Corrected - Miller Bs).  Remember Jan 2005 as an example for the North Jersey crowd.

  5. Just now, jm1220 said:

    This isn't a miller A. It's a miller B transferring storm. 

    That’s inferred in my post.  I assume most of us are caught up on the Miller classifications.  If not, I’ve seen some good Miller Bs for my area in NJ.  Dec 2003, Jan 2005, couple last decade of variety in scale, and even fringed on a few that slammed LI late the last decade.  

    • Like 3
  6. 12 minutes ago, bluewave said:

    We will want to see what the 12z Euro does. 

    Agreed.  One commonality that is significant in all the models now is the stronger frontogenesis and moisture transport and thus QPF on the models.  Another thing to watch.   Getting a feeling some locations in PA are going to get the 30” marker.

  7. 4 minutes ago, bluewave said:

    The sensitivity seems to be how fast the trough goes neutral tilt. The NAM is more positive tilt than the CMC, so it has had a colder track further east. The NAM seems to be closer to consensus so far today than the GEM.

    The Euro made significant shifts in that direction too after holding steady days earlier contesting the GFS solution a bit.

×
×
  • Create New...