Jump to content

tomcatct

Members
  • Posts

    200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tomcatct

  1. 1 minute ago, Eduardo said:

    Some winters, "it just wants to snow" (e.g., '93–94, '95–'96, '13–'14, '14–'15).  I don't think this is one of those winters, so I'll take whatever I can get.  6–10 inches is a respectable storm!

    That is very true ..no science to it.. just some years it finds a way to snow.

    • Like 1
  2. 5 minutes ago, JBG said:

    On February 11, 1983 I remember watching the slow advance from the law library on Vesey Street. I saw the curtain of snow envelope the Verrazano. I grabbed the subway to my office on 40th street where it barely started snowing about 30 minutes later. The edge of the snow really crawled.

    I was 14 years old for that storm and I can tell you that was the craziest thundersnow I have ever seen

  3. 4 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

    RGEM is solid-thinking we see other models beef up the QPF output as we get closer to go time  (western side)

    I definitely think us Connecticut folks will do pretty well with the storm.

    I agree the western side will fill out more than is modeled ..the bands are going to set up where they want to and hopefully we are under them .

  4. 2 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

    Nice run AND no reason to think it can't get even better (a little earlier and SW). Trending back.

    I am close to you and I'm optimistic we get more than modeled. 

    The heavy bands sometimes rotate further west of modeling so I think we may do pretty well.

  5. 1 minute ago, dendrite said:

    :lol:

    I was a senior in HS for that so I'll take your word on that. That's like the dinosaur age of modeling.

    It's funny, I remember Brad field mentioning on the 6 pm news days before the storm that one of the lesser relied upon models,  he said the Japanese model, is showing a blizzard..all  on it's own.

    IMO, he was an excellent met. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...