Ji

1 hour ago, Terpeast said:

Yeah, I’d have to compare my conus temp/precip maps in my outlook vs actual, should be a decent match. What went wrong was my snowfall outlook had baked in at least one big storm. Which didn’t happen.

i mean you made the right call. One of the wettest winters of all time....i bet you would call for a big storm again given what you know

Super nice guy in person though lol. 

On Sat. morning I can drive to 4400 ft. withing 20 miles of my place. A lot better than 95 miles to Cannan for 3400 ft.. , 1000 ft. lower.   Of course that would be 70 miles n.w..
 

10 minutes ago, BTRWx's Thanks Giving said:

It's close to something big, but we need a lot of help from ensembles. 

so you think the ensembles will help the storm become snowier?

1 hour ago, WEATHER53 said:

You must stop responding to every single post I make, 95% of which are not directed to you

its stalking

its creepy

its not going to drive me away 

You are out of line. I have asked for you to cut it out and now I’m telling You-Cut it out.

Moderators-the history is right in  this thread with support from many other threads. This guy is obsessive. Take care of it please and thank you 

dont show Howard this chart

5 hours ago, paulythegun said:

Lol

dont laugh lol...the euro has us starting as snow next weekend!

Go outside. 

How we lookin?

EPS had some massive hitters at 00z---gone at 12z. this hobby sucks ass

lock up the JMA and call it a winter

Someone remind me…we want to be on the southern edge of a snowstorm at day 6-10 right?  

33 of 50 euro members gave me snow in my March 18-21 window lol

WB EPS:  week before Easter period.

Wrong thread wb

Sent from my SM-A515U using Tapatalk

18z aifs is def snow. May not stick but it’s snow lol

Probably west of Hancock ends up with a 1' + if it played out like the Euro AI shows
 

Those people includes you. Or did you move?

4 hours ago, WEATHER53 said:

From page 47

First-The numerical models will have enough accuracy that errors will no longer be significant 

Second-accuracy and resolution producing crisp, clear and complete  pictures of the atmosphere at all times 

Third-By 2025 the power of computers will have increased 100,000X and will clearly resolve the weather for the (DC) area.

These writers  and contributors were not noobs nor  foolishly  hopeful.  They were up to date and on target with their current situation and where things were headed.

What happened?

Well one thing we see clearly right here-vigorous defense of status  quo. Almost like we are helpless if we try another route.

Probably  one more entry of where the best and brightest of  the time validly thought this science was headed.  What happened????

the models have been predicting a cold 2nd half of march now since Mid February...and it looks like we are on track. Thats pretty impressive dude!

1 minute ago, CAPE said:

That low is inland actually. Pretty low chance for frozen with that track in the lowlands. Not in late March. Head to Canaan.

haha--those lowland people

34 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

There could be some instability in meso banding. We could even see localized thunder rain!  

its not really a perfect track. Its like more like a march 1993 track right?

9 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Even for my area it’s 35 during the height. It’s definitely snow but I doubt much accumulation at those temps. Places at or above 2000 feet sure! 

PSU---remember the old Euro--from like 2 weeks ago. Wouldnt that imply a colder solution?

2 hours ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

Shouldn’t this be pinned?

it really should. I have been calling for a storm in this time frame now since November haha

lets go!

PSU said March 58 would be a rainstorm in todays climate....and---he appears to be right

1 hour ago, WxUSAF said:

Don’t know about snow, but I think a few hard freezes seem likely. Plenty cold to kill the magnolia tree blossoms that are going to come out next week probably…

starting a new long range thread!