Jump to content

Alfoman

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Alfoman

  1. 2 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

    Yeah, it's markedly better so far.   I need to see a few more panels.   Not going to try to predict what it's gonna do, but it's going to be a better run in terms of a storm...not saying it's gonna be a hit

    100% - honestly pretty similar evolution so far compared to 18Z yesterday (not identical). Could confidently say it's a less messy solution so far though day h5...

  2. 1 minute ago, JenkinsJinkies said:

    Looks like it’ll be all snow for the bulk of us. Remember when it was forecast to briefly transition to a mix?

    Definitely had some sleet mixing into the earlier bands from DC south, so that was not wrong fully. It just never was the extent the NAM had projected it to be 

  3. 9 minutes ago, Amped said:

    The lead  500mb wave seems to be killing our chances on overnight runs. It helps keep the troff positively tilted too long, so the coastal bombs well offshore.

    The initial phase and transfer of energy on Friday (Hour 96-ish) is what determines our fate here - especially with that lead wave.

    Difference between the GFS bomb runs and 0z/6z is a stronger lead SW, allowing the baja energy to stay further back southwest for longer before completing the phase with the northern stream. This results in too positive of a tilt and would likely yield a low well off-shore by the time it reaches us. Yesterday's good run had that NS shortwave leading the phase process and ending up more neutral before it hits the EC. Such a delicate dance of energies involved here...this is going to be tough to bring home. 

  4. Definitely hitting our stride in DC proper the past hour or two with even lighter returns showing up with pretty good rates. Very fine flakes falling but still coming down pretty hard. Eclipsing 6' at the moment. 

    • Like 2
  5. Around 5.25 here in Shaw - absolutely gorgeous morning out and still coming down pretty good. I'd say it was a 70/30 split between Snow and Sleet at points during the previous heavy band. You can see the faint mixing shadows on CC radar. 

    • Like 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, Deck Pic said:

    We had two 3-6" events like 60 hours apart last winter. Snow on snow.

    That was fun because we went from close to nothing to a more robust storm twice. 

    This time we've been watching it for a week+, it's fun to know something is coming (and hurts so much more when we get the big shaft) 

  7. You can tell it's been a while since everyone has tracked a real dynamic storm around these parts - these model battles are half the fun. 

    Quite literally a day ago - the GFS has the shortwave strung out and open and now we're looking at a 2 contour closed off low at H5 before the transfer to the coast. That's a considerable amount of variability within the ML evolution within a 24-36 hour window. It's going to happen. 

    Until the CMC/Euro/Ukie camp begins to show a similar shift in regards to strength + ML warm nose - I will side with the models who have not wavered much over the last day or so versus the one playing catch up. GFS could definitely catch a win here, but there's no need to freak out about an event starting in 72 hours. 

    Side Note: I am wondering if a couple inches up north (Metro into PA) with staying power into Sunday could help bring things down a degree or two at the sfc. I am noticing a band of slightly cooler temps along wherever the GFS sets up its maxima for tomorrow's squalls. It's slight but we'll take the help.

    • Like 2
    • 100% 1
  8. 1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

    Gulf low firing up, but hard to see how it turns the corner at this point.  Again, regardless there seems to be a ton of potential in future runs.

    So much energy flying around out West, there's no chance the GFS truly sniffs out the UL evolution until closer to this weekend. Chess pieces in place though...

  9. 1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

    lol...it cuts

    GEM and GFS honestly relatively similar looks at 500 mb while the vort is still out west - GFS just quicker by 6-12 hours and cuts hard due to the interaction with the TPV vorticity in Canada sooner. 

    After hour 156 though... good lord GEM has a nightmare reputation with deciphering a progressive NS like we'd have here. 

  10. 2 hours ago, Terpeast said:

    GFS and CMC shifted away from the follow up wave idea. Very much looks like snow is not in the cards this round, other than the potential little squall tomorrow morning early. 

    Euro has been rock solid, and has been the better model lately (despite the flak it gets). Verification scores support this.  

    Would not say it is out of the cards completely just yet - amount of members showing a secondary wave sliding off the cost doubled on the 6Z GEFS. 

     

    This is a delicate balancing act between the initial low in question and the real potential right behind it. The GFS and CMC have transitioned into a quicker phase of shortwaves out west, instead of slowing things down by keeping energy dragged out in the SW. If we can slow the phase and have it dig further, generating more time for the cold to filter back in post storm #1...there could be something here. Lot has to go right here though as always.

     

    image.png.adb9242ee7e0bd7a07be61b68fbccce0.png

    • Like 1
  11. 19 hours ago, stormy said:

    Thanks Bob!  I always enjoy reading your take on things.

    My memories of lots of snow and lots of cold always take me back to the 60's in the Valley.  We frequently had skating ice on ponds and rivers in those days and usually plenty of snow for sleigh-riding down slopes and across frozen ponds with 6 - 8 inches of ice. 

    But, we have had some good years since the 60's like 77-78 with 55" of snow.  79-80 with 49", 86-87 53",  09 - 10 with 63" and who could forget 95 - 96 with 63 inches of snow. Even 13 - 14 with 41 inches would be nice again.

    It will happen again and probably when we least expect it long- range.

    Thank you ya'll for providing all the historical context for the younger millennials. I moved up to the DMV area a few years back and I am still learning all the folklore from decades-past. 

    Sitting in the Southeast during the early 2000s-2010s periods, I felt like those smaller 1-5' inch storms were a more regular occurrence up North but those have seem to have subsided some since the 80s. Can't even get excited about a clipper potential anymore! 

    November is always such a tough month of model watching. Nothing particularly exciting going on in the tropical Atlantic while we are stuck to speculate on the winter pattern as we enter mid to late December. The transitionary period is where I feel like the cliff jumpers start setting up their chair cliff-side - rabid Pacific doomsdayers meet long range model blocking truthers. 

    Cheers to November :beer: 

    • Haha 1
  12. 1 minute ago, olafminesaw said:

    The new eyewall is very much open on the South and West side of the storm. Need to watch convective bursts to see if they can sustain all the way around the eye, or if shear keeps the eyewall open. For days the hurricane models have been showing the "halficane" look with dry air making it's way into the system, so that's kinda what I'd lean towards.

    diag20241009T121328_ssmis16_85.png

    While still difficult to see on radar with attenuation preventing us from observing the west side of the eyewall clearly - it looks as if the original eyewall is already merging with the secondary maxima. It's a race against the clock on whether the storm can mostly complete the EWRC before the shear/dry air intrusion overcome the structure of the storm. I genuinely am surprised on how quickly this EWRC commenced though...

  13. 2 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

    They’re certainly doing the best they can. They’re weenies as much as we are. But they have limited crews, planes, and procedural schedules to live by—probably some of it for safety reasons. 

    Absolutely agree - not blaming NOAA in the slightest, just saying I wish we did have some data coming in via recon at the moment. NOAA does the best they can given budget restraints and limited planes (plus the hazard like you said)

    • Like 2
  14. Want to relay an important caveat to all the early ensembles and models - the placement of the broad LLC will be critical in the GOM track. Regardless of whether it has a weak surface reflection at the moment, land interaction over Cuba and the mountains on the west side of the island will likely cause some re-structuring of the mid-level and low level circulation. 

    The 12Z GFS has the broad vorticity elongated as it passes Western Cuba at 60 hours but has the LLC forming on the northern fringe of that vort - could easily see a shift by 100s of miles if that formation happens west of that spot. Anyone from LA to the FL coast should be on alert - once its go time, there's not much stopping immediate strengthening.  

    • Like 1
  15. Just now, Ji said:

    Gfs does not drop the ns into the ss. No cold despite decent track

    I think the Euro evolution is our best shot to get our big (or larger) ticket storm but it is going to be a delicate solution to achieve. We really need that NS to drop down and begin the phase at the exact right moment for this to work and even if it does, the interior is favored in this kind of setup. Good news is we did see the SS dip deeper and a less noisy Eastern Canada allowing more cold air to filter in but Euro much more aggressive with that TPV lobe. 

    Even with a +NAO in place, with all that energy rotating around in Canada, we could see a phased storm time itself correctly as long as we can get the STJ to actually produce a potent wave or two instead of that sheared flat shit it keeps throwing our way. 

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...