Jump to content

msuwx

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by msuwx

  1. 1 minute ago, Wow said:

    Temp and DP actually went up in the past hour by a degree.  41.7/28.9.  Going to need to sit in a heavy band to drop these sfc temps if anything it going to accumulate.

    Yeah the wet bulb will probably remain above freezing in CLT throughout the precip time-frame. Going to take some great rates to overcome the 'warm-ish' boundary layer enough to accumulate. 

    I'm not crazy about the overall look from CLT-GSP, but we will see. Radar looks good though.

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  2. 6 minutes ago, BullCityWx said:

    Matt, for the life of me, I can’t figure out how people are complaining about this run if you’re almost anywhere north of 74 in NC. What do they want?

    I don't either. Personally, give me a moisture-packed system over one where people are hoping the light precip is heavy enough.

    • Like 4
  3. 22 minutes ago, SnowDawg said:

    The 6z Euro was not drier than the 0z run. Definitely still drier than other models, but the main/control/mean all bumped slightly north with QPF. It just spent over a whole day going back and forth with every single run. 

    Exactly. This narrative that the 6z Euro was drier than the 0z is false. 

     

    3 minutes ago, TARHEELPROGRAMMER88 said:

    Never bet against the ECMWF. NAM and other models appear to be caving slowly to ECMWF and UKMET. IMHO

    Watching the 12z NAM now, but through prior runs, this is not correct. The Euro has shifted toward the NAM, not the other way around. 

    • Like 5
    • Thanks 2
  4. On the 12z Canadian, there's much less upper level (500mb) dynamics involved because of the handling of the vort moving out of the Rockies into the Plains Thursday morning. 0z GEM kept it rolling southeast and there was a degree of phasing of the system, leading to the NW side of our coastal low blossoming with precip.

    12z GEM takes the Rockies vort to the ENE (rather odd-looking) and you get little to no interaction with it and our coastal system.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  5. I really like the odds of a nice, west-east oriented area of overrunning snow with this system. The setup is ripe for that, assuming we get decent precip rates. The air aloft is plenty cold for snow, and only gets colder as the event unfolds.

    The question is will the band with the right balance of cold air/ precipitation overlap to generate snow be in northern SC, southeastern NC, further north, or will precip remain too light to really generate any accumulating snow in most places. 

    Too soon to know. 

    • Like 14
  6. Pet peeve alert....

    This is largely a board for weather enthusiasts. It gets very old when the flood of the same, tired, snide comments come in after someone posts a medium-range model map. I think everyone reading this board is aware a single run of a deterministic model (or single ensemble member) will likely never verify in the extended medium range.

    But what are people supposed to post? A picture of an overcast sky? The purpose of the board is to discuss whatever there is to discuss, and unfortunately for snow fans, medium-range snapshots are about all we've got. 

    End of rant... back to your regularly-scheduled programming.

    • Like 21
    • Thanks 6
  7. 3 hours ago, Iceagewhereartthou said:

    Except most of those winters took place before 2010, you know, when it actually got cold every now and then. Most of us haven't even had a close call yet. Not to mention we're well past 1/15 and it's not looking good. Still, theres hope. 

     

    1 hour ago, StantonParkHoya said:

    The coldest week in history for a large swath of NC occurred in the last 3 years. 

    The 'it doesn't get cold anymore' narrative gets tiresome. 

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 3
×
×
  • Create New...