friedmators

Looks like they got ~100kts in the NE eyewall on the last pass. Doesn't look like we have a dropsonde.

Microwave has multiple EWesque features.

943.8i/110 SFMR per recon.  Quite surprised shes still this strong with the IR temps being shown.

1 minute ago, hlcater said:

SW eyewall is frankly not that impressive. Only 100kts SFMR.

 

 

Typical ERC progression no? Pressure first then winds

942.8 on recon

The rainfall totals are going to be astronomical this run of the Euro.

Presentation on IR looks to be improving rapidly.


.

Serious winds in that dropsonde.

3 minutes ago, SN_Lover said:

0z NAM is actually SW at 30. 

I mean it only initialized 30mb high.  Let's run with it!

3 hours ago, donsutherland1 said:

Apparently, there seems to be contextual information related to Dr. Bates' criticism of the Karl paper.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/business/energy-environment/climate-change-dispute-john-bates.html

I am still confused.  So was it an archiving issue or a sea surface/ship data swap issue?  Both are mentioned.

nam is 3pm/am not 2 i believe