Jump to content

EastKnox

Members
  • Posts

    161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by EastKnox

  1. 17 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

    Been out of pocket most of the day...just took a look at the 12z Euro.  I am like @Blue Ridge.  I would roll with that track.  I think the problem was the high was weak over the top, maybe like 1024 over the Lakes.  That hp fluctuates with each run due to being so far out.  The 12z GEFS is impressive w snowfall amounts.  Ensembles are important at this range as most know.  Someone, feel free to post it if you have it.  I am about out of space and time....

    Here are a couple of GEFS images.

    GEFS Ensembles United States MSLP 138.png

    GEFS Ensembles undefined undefined 162.png

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 3
  2. I have started this thread in order to have a place to ask questions about weather phenomena and features we see in models.  In particular, I'll see some discussion happening about an upcoming weather event, but may not understand all of what I'm reading.  I don't want to muck up the main discussion with general questions so I thought that a separate thread could be helpful for us with less knowledge.  Of course, this isn't an atmospheric sciences course condensed into a forum thread, but maybe a few tidbits of info will be shared that we can benefit from.

     

    I'll start with one that relates to our current situation.  I hear a lot of about split flow of the polar and subtropical jets.  What is the best way to identify the split flow?  Have I identified it correctly in the 250 mb winds chart below, or would you look elsewhere? (500 mb) and do you look for certain heights (like 540 dm in the 500mb chart) to identify the polar jet?

    InkedGFS Pressure Lev United States 250 hPa Wind 204_LI.jpg

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. A question to the regular posters and those with more weather knowledge than me...which is practically everyone.  Would it be in poor taste to start a sort of "education" thread where one could ask for explanations of certain weather phenomena?  Not expecting to replace study and research, but sometimes some things are posted that are obviously over my head and I do my best to scour the internet for explanations.  This could be a topic to allow some questions and maybe even a place to post good articles/webpages as we run across them.  Thoughts?

    • Like 1
  4. 6 minutes ago, hazwoper said:

    Are you saying this was a huge miss?  We have people in surge areas needing to be evacuated from their attics....from their ATTICS!

    No, not saying this was a miss, I'm referring to the situation that causes people to question evacuating in the future.

    I'm just asking folks to acknowledge that needless evacuations end up hurting too.  They cause distrust in those making the evacuation decision and may ultimately save lives in this storm and cost them in another.

    • Like 1
  5. 10 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

    It has always been like this, the same things happen with any other weather event especially snowstorms. 

    I wish people understood all the possibilities instead of jumping on the most extreme one and going along with it.

    Yeah if you ride the hype train, then anything less than a 10 will feel lackluster, which is extremely dangerous because then people let their guard down. You don't need a worse case scenario to get a lot of damage. 

    This is true, but we can't stick our heads in the sand and ignore the flip side - why do people let there guard down?  Is it because they evacuated the last storm or two or three and the forecasts were wrong?  Do they get desensitized to the hype and then swing too far the other direction?

    When there is a mandatory evacuation, people lose time at work and then incur the burden of the cost of the evacuation.  Most families can't afford it, but make it happen because the government says so.  When the storm is over and it wasn't a near miss, but a huge miss, people second guess the next time.

  6. 13 minutes ago, hazwoper said:

    I see you are new here.  Do us and yourself a favor...read more and post less ;)

    image.png.0340fc948cf0de084b5d55a4d88a2006.png

    Looks like he actually joined in 2010, so maybe he does read more and post less??

     

    He may be bitter due to the missed flight and all, but it shouldn't erase the validity of one of his points...desensitizing of the public after many "cry wolf" situations.  A coworker of mine who telecommutes from the area evacuated as requested on Tuesday at 12 noon.  After seeing some irresponsible social media posts AND official media dubbing this the "storm of a lifetime," they decided to move even farther inland.  I urged them to follow the NHC and their recommendations rather than watch the sensational news stories.  And from the fact that a normal 4 hour trip took them 10 hours, I'm guessing many others did the same.   If they go back home next week after losing time from work and spending money on a one week hotel stay only to find nothing happened, they'll be more hesitant to act the next time.  I have family living in Beaufort that began packing as soon as the governor ordered their evacuation.  They got on the road early to beat the traffic only to find out that the evacuation was cancelled the next morning.  They then had to immediately turn around to get back to work.  I wonder if they'll hesitate the next time an evacuation order is issued.

    Most of us posting on this forum understand the difficulties in forecasting this stuff and know that when "storm of a lifetime" was thrown around on Tuesday, that it could very well be that or not.  The general public is too trusting of the media who frequently leave out pertinent info so that the viewer will draw the most sensational conclusion.

    As the population of these coastlines continues to increase, it makes the decisions even harder for authorities.  Our current technology doesn't allow us to pinpoint with confidence until about 24-36 hours out, but with the population increasing, that isn't enough time to get everyone out of harm's way.  We're between a rock and a hard place and the sensationalizing media rarely helps.

    • Like 7
  7. 12z GFS indicating dry air at 700mb leading up to and at 2 pm on Monday.  With the sun being more than halfway through partial eclipse, maybe this will suppress the Cu like Jeff indicated.   Dew points at the surface are also showing low to mid 60's.  I noticed that small windfield vortex in W. Tennessee.  Is that what's pulling in the dry air from the north?

    700rh.conus.png

  8. 21 hours ago, dwagner88 said:

    I'm going to try to get to the top of the Cherohala Skyway. It's at 5400 ft, so heat won't be an issue, but cloud cover might be. There are several balds in the area that would make great vantage points. 

    That was originally my plan as well, but I feared that I might find myself in a traffic jam trying to get to one of those spots, so I opted for a location that I could anchor down over the weekend and be waiting on Monday.

×
×
  • Create New...