Jump to content

stormtracker

Administrators
  • Posts

    61,591
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stormtracker

  1. You apparently forgot the nam history this winter At 84 hours? Nah
  2. Its a little concerning nam aint having any of that cad Only to you would NAM at 84 hours would be concerning in the face of every other model having it.
  3. Yall better not even THINK about asking for a separate thread right now
  4. RGEM got dat CAD all the way down to the SC/GA border. It can still eat it
  5. The nam continues to destroy our dreams Just yours. The rest of us are normal and reasonable.
  6. Only argument would be it's NAM past prime time and other models don't have that warm layer. That's all I can come up with.
  7. NAM not as cold as Euro or GFS. WE all start as heavy sleet
  8. I mean, its plenty cold, just going by the old rule that heavier rates aren't as "good" for accretion. Lot of that could just run off if it's super heavy. I dunno. We might wanna ask one of those guys with the red tags to be sure.
  9. hopefully for all of us. Just give me one panel with that dark blue.
  10. Quite the nasty ZR stomr at 96...but might be mitigated by heavy rates? Anyway, GFS may even be too warm if we are using @high risk rule
  11. Were bleeding. I think it was 7 before But we're not tho. Don't the GFS ever had me at 7
  12. GFS positioning looks the same re: snow/sleet line, but precip looks heavier
×
×
  • Create New...