Jump to content

weatherbear5

Members
  • Posts

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by weatherbear5

  1. 15 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

    The way we measure storms has to change.  It's not just about wind speed it's also about size.  That's what truly determines how strong and devastating a storm can be- its total energy.  Doing that shows that Sandy was the strongest storm to ever hit our region.

     

    In the wise words of my girlfriend, “size isn’t everything”

    • Haha 5
  2. 15 minutes ago, jm1220 said:

    Yep it’s pouring here in Long Beach. Not as hard as last night but enough to I’m sure flood some basements. I checked out the waves-maybe 5-6 footers but 2 days before Sandy they seemed twice as high. 

    Sandy was a HUGE storm with a huge wind field, this is a relatively tiny storm with a small wind field, not surprised the waves are much smaller

    that stationary rain band was what I was worried about. LBI looks like it’s getting hammered

  3. 7 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

    The GFS is banking on a much weaker storm and that’s a big reason it’s so far East. 

    Well yeah, my point was at this point in time it wasn’t crazy.

     

    With that being said, it looks as good as it has structurally, and convection is finally starting to burst in the southern half of the eye wall… need to watch this closely since if it does manage to strengthen rapidly it would change the equation

  4. Let’s see if that deep convection that fired in the southern eye wall can wrap around the eye. Seems like it may be trying to ward off some dry air. If it can do so, it still has some room to strengthen

  5. 1 hour ago, NJwx85 said:

    Weenie maps are for weenies. That's not just for snow, but for all precip types.

    The soundings mostly support plenty of sleet and freezing rain for the whole area.

    Freezing rain is more likely closer to the coast where the cold air is shallower. I would still favor mostly plain rain for the city but the surface temps on the GFS sure give me pause for concern.

    The GFS is usually too warm at the surface. 

    The scary thing about this setup is that models are notoriously bad at estimating WAA above the surface and CAD at the surface

    Methinks this has the makings of the biggest ice storm  a lot of areas have seen in a while, particularly at the coast

    Heres hoping it trends colder aloft for more sleet or snow than FZRA

  6. We need more of the PV to stick around because we NEED that confluence to keep this from cutting. You have a beautiful split-flow which will result in strong high pressure to the north, but without that confluence it becomes a risk for a major ice storm

    Energy from the Pacific rotates in and pulls the PV, elongating it and eventually opening it up and sending it into the North Atlantic. If we can keep that anchored over Quebec, it will allow the low to cut under us, rather then into the Lakes

    that’s the difference between, say, the 12z GFS (cutter) and 12z CMC (coastal)

     

    • Like 1
  7. 1 minute ago, HVSnowLover said:

    It’s only 6 hours of precipitation and half of it SE of the city is not snow 

    It’s more like 9 hours, and more like Suffolk County has the severe mixing issues verbatim on the RGEM for the first 2 hours

    Once the heavier precip moves in it flips everyone at the coast to snow. Problem is there’s not a ton of heavy precip around at all on the RGEM. Ugly run for sure

×
×
  • Create New...