Jump to content

NCBlizzard

Members
  • Posts

    646
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NCBlizzard

  1. 1 minute ago, NCsandhills said:

    Beautiful rates in North Hills. That being said I would be surprised if we end up with more than 3". I'll be going for a whiskey-laden walk around me hood in an hour or so to take some pics and take in the smell/feel

    Also beautiful here. Just did similar myself taking the dog for a walk. Roads are totally covered. As I was walking back inside, a cop came whizzing by and a minute later I heard sirens, so I figure it's slick out

    • Like 2
  2. I’m at 31.3 with a wet bulb of 30.2 in South Durham, right at I-40. A solid glaze on elevated surfaces/trees (maybe 0.05”), but sidewalks and roads are just wet. I’m surprised we got this cold here based on trends late last night.


    At 9 AM, my station was 2.2°F colder than the NAM and 1.4°F colder than the HRRR projected. Some more light precip moving in now so we’ll see if those trends mean anything at this point. Oddly enough, GFS/RDPS have been the most accurate on temps so far.

     

  3. 27 minutes ago, Buddy1987 said:

    I tend to think however it does run a little too cold in some instances but this atmosphere we have preceding the storm is pretty damn cold. I mean even some of those zr numbers if you cut them in half are still a terrible scenario. 

    I agree it definitely runs colder, and sometimes by a lot. At the very least, it seems to run 2-4°F too cold on average. RGEM forecast low for tonight here is 15, which is 6 degrees cooler than the NWS forecast and around 10 degrees cooler than all other models except the Canadian. I have a hard time believing we get to 15 here, but we shall see…

  4. 16 minutes ago, BullCityWx said:

    Sometimes things just don’t break your way at all with these storms. If we had more QPF this morning, we would’ve had accumulation easily. I left with a coating of snow and sleet on my car today. Starting with 18z yesterday, there’s been a hole over Durham and Wake Counties on the short range modeling and seemingly they are accurate with that. We don’t have the lift here that they’ve seen west, south and probably east of us will see. 
     

    it’s a good thing I considered anything from this event a bonus. 

     

    13 minutes ago, BullCityWx said:

    The triangle has done quite well if you count back the last five years or so. 

    Yep, been stuck in that hole for a while here in south Durham. I noticed it on the HRRR but hoped it was a fluke. Overall, had a brief rain/snow/sleet mix early this morning 5-6 am, leaving a trace on elevated surfaces. Then a rain/snow mix since 7:30. I didn't have my hopes too high overall though. And you're right about the Triangle being really lucky the past several years. Can't complain much at all given that.

  5. While every model was too warm with dew point/wet bulb temperature here at my place in Durham, still just a cold 33° rain. Below is the forecast dew point error for 9 AM compared against the 32.7°F recorded at my station:

    HRRR +0.8°

    GFS +1.1°

    RGEM +2.2°

    NWS NDFD +2.3°

    NAM +2.3°

  6. Still mixing here in SW Durham.  Need it to changeover sometime soon.  It’s starting to get dark which should help accumulations.
    I'm near Southpoint Mall and all snow. It's really coming down. My station is reading 34 and wet bulb is almost to 32

    Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  7. 1 minute ago, BullCityWx said:

    Dewpoint has been consistently dropping at RDU this morning.

    I noticed as well, and the same is happening at my house with the dewpoint dropping at -2.8°/hr now. There seems to be a stretch of locally higher DP through parts of S Orange, S Durham, and W Wake county but hopefully that disappears quickly. NAM dewpoint forecast was about a degree higher at 8AM that what I measured with my station.

  8. 11 minutes ago, SnowJoMoJo said:

    Hi All,

    Does anyone know what all factors are included in the "Snow Depth" plots on Pivotal?  Is it based on Kuchera or straight 10:1? Consider compaction? Melting due to ground temps?   Is this plot generally accurate?  

    Thanks!

    There is a snow melt forecast variable, which I assume accounts for things like ground/air temperature, and that would be incorporated to calculate the snow depth. I also believe it accounts for snow density/compaction. I'm not sure of the overall accuracy. You can see all of the forecast variables here: https://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/products/nam/nam.t00z.bgrdsf00.tm00.shtml

  9. 2 minutes ago, FallsLake said:

    The HRRR did show it temporarily shifting back south before the "real" push north. Hopefully that happens. This is some really good accumulating snow.

    I'm also impresses with the temp drop. Currently at 29.6.  

    It has been consistent in showing that which is encouraging. I noticed the 6z NAM also wanted to shift the transition zone back south after briefly pushing it northward.

    The rates are amazing right now!

  10. 18 minutes ago, FallsLake said:

    Earlier today my NWS grid forecast was set at 5-9" for Sunday (daytime period). It was reduced to 3-5" after lunch time.  Now it's been bumped back up to 3-7". Again, I'm wondering what models they're using to create these output. Anybody know?

     

    I think it at least starts with what they call the "National Blend of Models" that is then adjusted by individual offices before the forecast data actually goes into NWS NDFD forecast grids. Here's a a link to some info about that: https://www.weather.gov/mdl/nbm_about and you can also see the text output for the NBM for airports across the US by navigating through this directory: http://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov/pub/data/nccf/com/blend/prod/

×
×
  • Create New...