Jump to content

CTWeatherFreak

Members
  • Posts

    1,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CTWeatherFreak

  1. 1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

    I wonder if you can forecast negative snow...since we measure snow that reaches the ground (a positive value) what about snow that evaporates before reaching the ground...or gets caught in the updrafts?..it's not falling to the ground...it's rising farther from the ground. 

    Yes.. seems too me more than once weve  had 6" of virga.

  2. From the Valley Girls:

     

    ********************STORM TOTAL SNOWFALL********************
    
    LOCATION          STORM TOTAL     TIME/DATE   COMMENTS
                         SNOWFALL           OF
                         /INCHES/   MEASUREMENT
    
    CONNECTICUT
    
    ...Hartford County...
       2 WNW North Granby    18.0   645 AM 12/03  Trained Spotter
       North Granby          16.3   715 AM 12/03  Trained Spotter
       Bradley AP            16.3   650 AM 12/03  Airport
       West Granby           15.3   941 AM 12/03  Public
       Canton                14.0   810 AM 12/03  Trained Spotter
       Simsbury              14.0   529 AM 12/03  Ham Radio
       Avon                  12.2   753 AM 12/03  Trained Spotter
       West Hartford         12.0   713 AM 12/03  Public
    • Like 1
  3. 57 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

    Yup ... and NWS made that very clear in their discussion prior to the event, that they were taking that philosophy/tact with this thing... 

    Having said that... I don't know about the wisdom in/and public perception of having done so personally - not that you or anyone asked.  PR and idiocracy factors don't really align with their level of precision and adherence to time-spans like that.  Silly really -  

    No ...the average person doesn't judicially judge these sort of things anywhere close to those internal aspects, ...and actually, the vast majority don't read their tech/reasoning discussions either.  They may not like hearing this, BUT, they need to consider how these advisories and warnings are consumed. More so at that end - but that's just imho.   NWS does not exist for their own precision - they exist paid for by the public ;) 

    To be fair, those time requirements work much of the time. However, this is/was an unusual circumstance that requires(d) a mutation of those requirements - this was a warning by totality of event scenario, sorry. More so than the other line of reasoning and though it is just my opinion, the PR angle should have been considered like the former.  Civility isn't ready nor responsible enough for their precision.  Maybe some day...  

    Nevertheless, a lot of towns in Hartford and Tolland counties under WWA picked up over 6" in the 12 hr overnight period.

  4. 3 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

    Yeah honestly I don't actually pay much attention to those hyper ala carte model types ... For all conceits and purposes of tech and excruciating computing power, they seem to throw almost as many variances, where just using the global models and smoothing them in mind's eye toward common sense works just as well.  

    But, part of the "don't really use the HRRR" means lack of exposure to that guidance sourcing; so objective fairness requires that I don't actually impugn the model -  I'm just saying as such from what I gather from what people post about it. Good and bad... and I'm lazy? ...so I rely on the smoothing above.  

    That said, Will mentioned the HRRR snowing through mid afternoon and that seems to be matching well - that's all I know ...haha 

    It also nailed the north/central CT enhancement  last night better than most.

  5. 19 minutes ago, snowman21 said:

    I don't think they blew it. They just didn't think widespread 6+ (did anyone?), and by the time they realized what was happening it was too late. It could have gone the other way too, and they would get criticized for it. It's easy to be the Monday morning quarterback.

    Cmon dude.. Dont you recall seeing days and days of model prognostications showing most of CT outside of Fairfield county with near nada?  Those maps will be permanently etched in my memory. And those areas that were portrayed as such, especially central ct counties, received 8-12 more than was being portrayed..   Thats a big bust for this area.  

  6. 17 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

    well we did slot for a long time, its just that bad that the NAM/EC and other models had really paid off and wasn't just some transient 1-3 type deal.

    I dont think any of them had the foot that many in the county received... And BOX blew it by not issuing a WSW for the area as well..  Positive busts, while somewhat rare, are definitely preferable to negative ones.

    • Like 1
  7. 22 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

    When CT peeps talk about CT getting skipped over on the RGEM its like the state ends at the Manchester HVN line. I mean this is skipping? 6 hr totals and still pounding 

    qpf_006h.us_ne.png

     

    Anything east of Hartford might as well be Rhode Island.

    • Sad 1
×
×
  • Create New...