Weather.St

Members
  • Content Count

    127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Weather.St

  • Rank
    Meteorology Student
  • Birthday 11/18/1981

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://weather.st
  • Skype
    Wxtalk

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location:
    Norwich,CT

Recent Profile Visitors

803 profile views
  1. A very good point. I would tend to agree here. Viable changes would include the factors that cause the most damage/loss of life, like flooding and surge.
  2. I recently wrote an article on the implications of a category 6 rank being added to the hurican scale. I wanted to get more input, however. Please vote on my poll and leave any comments here or on the website. http://weather.st/blog/category-6-hurricane-the-argument-is-real/
  3. I started a public weather photo upload website at http://pics.weather.st It allows anyone to upload their weather photos without registering. Photos are still owned by those who have taken them.
  4. In addition to this information, the ENSO forecast is that of a weakening El Nino, hence, the forecast basis is different than the Climatology of your typical El Nino winter.
  5. I have written a piece on what I currently see occurring with the weather patterns and how they will transition into winter. The forecast needs some slight tweaks here and there, but overall I tried to keep it as simple as I could so that people could understand it. http://weather.st/blog/winter-of-2015-2016-whats-the-verdict/ Now I realize there are quite a few people out there who will scream and throw eggs in my general direction for even putting this up, but be rest assured it is not a panic cry, or a hype job. And for those who are going to ask, "Where did you get this data from?" I took the time to mention in the article where the sources were coming from, and that analogs plus climatology had quite a bit to do with formation of the projection, not to mention trends over the past few years in storm tracks. Thanks! Please post your own forecasts as well here, I would love to see them!
  6. I am seeing the effects of the shear already to the north and east of the storm, pushing the feeder bands farther north and shrinking the moisture on the western side.
  7. Technically we might be talking about two different things right now. Either eye-wall filling or eyewall replacement. Either way a slight dip in strength could be the result followed by some RI. Given the position on the shear located to the north and west of the storm, it if very likely the eyewall filling in could most likely be a result of shear and not replacement, giving way to the idea of weakening. If so, that's jut physics for you. There is no real argument here in favor of one or the other until time has passed.
  8. Definitely better structure, but still a small hurricane in terms of overall size. Makes it easier for the storm to attain Cat 3 if bursts of convection continue. Still thinking shear down the road will hamper a bit, depending on direction of storm overall during the next 12-24 hours.
  9. Did a write up on my website concerning the possibilities. Looks like severe weather potential for sure, over a widespread area. http://weather.st/blog/northeast-wx-watching-tuesday-623/ About the best I can do with the information provided by soundings and charts. then again we are looking at things via NAM perspective...
  10. They are calling for some heavy thunderstorms into the area. Given the quick influx of humidity into the area on Tuesday, we can pretty much count on northern New England getting slammed come Tuesday Afternoon. The influence of the marine layer into Southern New England, mainly into Eastern Connecticut and Rhode Island could be a big damper on storms in that area, otherwise looking really good for a widespread severe event come Tuesday midday.
  11. I was shocked when I heard this proposal. However, most of you are correct on how bad the forecasting would get if you centralized all the offices into 6 locations. It would be absurd for anyone with half a degree in meteorology to think that 6 locations could forecast for all regions around those locations. This became apparent during the super lake effect snow even where over 70 inches fell into the Buffalo area. These kind of mesoscale weather patterns cannot be derived from a location outside of the event. Therefore, having regional offices like we currently have seems to be a bit more reliable. In fact, I could make the argument that we need a couple more offices in certain areas.
  12. I created a 30 minute audio program on Climate change and seeing it from both sides. posted it on my website a few weeks back. You can check it out here. http://weather.st/blog/scifixm-special-climate-change/ I am not saying I know the whole truth, but I did want to look at it from both perspectives.
  13. I agree with this. It is just a matter of time before the pattern changes. The models have been showing the signs for the past week that things are about to get a bit interesting, and I certainly see the cold air coming back into the CONUS. So I would tend to agree with Tropo, even if it's just a hunch.
  14. I have always been a fan of foliage up to a certain point... and that point is when they fall off the tree into my yard.