TigerTeacher

As this winds down, and everyone switches over to giving updates about what's really going on, I'm curious. All of these models you guys talk about, and which is better or worse... Are they getting better in general? I would imagine that as they "learn" more about what's really happened in the past, and they incorporate that knowledge into new models, they'd get better and start aligning more closely. Do the models "learn"? If they haven't been good at adapting or accounting for some odd shift in the atmosphere--or whatever--in the past, are they able to learn from those mistakes? Like all technology, even when they seems to be dealing with some level of chaos type theory for things brewing far in the distance, will they just get better and better to the point of knowing exactly what will happen weeks from a given point? Just curious. We're hunkering down.