
dabize
-
Posts
917 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Posts posted by dabize
-
-
Clearly it's being used as a fear-mongering attention-grabber in the article, though. Its usage there really wasn't necessary.
We shall see what happens with the methane. That's the problem with the climate; there are so many feedbacks that feed other feedbacks, ect.
Jesus - you think a little emphasis isn't called for here?
What part of .....continuous fountains of methane being injected directly into the atmosphere over 10,000 square miles of seabed......... do you find so reassuring that it calls for such reticence?
And this in a country that waxes so hysterical at the slightest excuse that we have become tolerized to hyprebole.
We ARE SEEING what is happening with the methane.....
These guys, for instance, are living with the consequences of all this polite understatement of the consequences of AGW
http://www.irinnews.org/Report.aspx?ReportId=81079
And if that doesn't bother you, maybe the fact that we will be living with them - and lots more like them - as refugees because of AGW will.
Better brush up on your Bengali
-
DEADLY gases?!? That does sound bad.
Methane is deadly.
Your point?
-
"Retreat of Arctic sea ice releases deadly greenhouse gas."
http://www.independe...as-6276134.html
It looks like the sst anomaly is destabilizing methane hydrate big time.
Could this be the missing feedback that explains why the models are underestimating the melt?
We've been waiting for this shoe to drop ever sent those guys went up to the Laptev two months ago (or whenever it was) to investigate initial reports of this. The acceleration mechanism for AGW has made its entrance and taken a bow.
I'll bet it make no impression whatever on our little cadre of "skeptics" here though. They'll dig up a bunch of emails from the Climatology Department of the University of Krasnoyarsk to demonstrate that nothing out of the ordinary is happening.
Sigh
This is not good.
in Climate Change
Posted
The point is that this is change in ONE direction, not either direction.
Talk about a poor analogy........