Jump to content

RockerfellerSnow

Members
  • Posts

    53
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RockerfellerSnow

  1. 3 minutes ago, Ericjcrash said:

    No. Looks to go too far North. LHV theres a slight chance.

    You’ve been wrong, I’m betting that a thundersnow could hit the Times Square area!

    If I lose I don’t post for 2 months this time. 

    If you want to make the high stakes... I think I’ll even bet that we get another one in a week or so. Similar maybe more snow but no rain this time. Heck this storm is colder than modeled for sure so therefore I would like to conclude that models are good but crappy at the same time. You have to solve the problem that the season makes sense.

  2. 11 minutes ago, donsutherland1 said:

    You may have misread his post. He wrote, "... 2” for the far Uws where I work (120th and Broadway)." That's not far from Central Park's Zoo, so it implies a measurable snowfall even there.

    P.S. Given some past measurement debacles at the Park, it's an open question whether you will be the only one measuring. Last winter, there was one or two occasions that no measurements appeared to be made after the snow stopped falling and then had either melted or been washed away by the rain by the time it fell. Traffic camera footage showed a easily visible coating and such a coating is more than a trace.

    I still think Central Park will record at least 2... where he is probably closer to 3

  3. 1 minute ago, LongBeachSurfFreak said:

    They are much further west then us and away from the ocean. I remember an early season event in early December about 10 years ago where they snowed and we rained.

    I still like a coating for the coast and 2” for the far Uws where I work (120th and Broadway)

    Dude we’re colder and more north this isn’t a coating for Central Park mark my words. I’m in Central Park today and I will personally go and measure and show you guys

  4. Just now, Ericjcrash said:

    Dont be so sure. Its surely possible. HRRR has burned us all many times. Depth change maps of HRRR do show 2-3" though but thats overdone IMO depicts quite a bit of sleet.

    Hrrr is the best model att 

     

    Hrrr has 6 hours of heavy wet snow for the city and 2 hours of frozen mix and than dry slot

    75A5EEC2-B147-4087-B0EB-8BAAAED2B54C.png

    A90ED1DA-D4C3-484E-8E82-3583B022047A.png

  5. 4 minutes ago, Ericjcrash said:

    Emphasis on weenie. Gfs all out rainstorm. They will toss it now but in 3 weeks when it shows a crazy solution at 180 hours it will be paraded around like a triple crown winner.

    Gfs always does this. It’s great with track and time but a lot of times it doesn’t record the dynamics of the system and it essentially fails in the precipitation types in winter months.

  6. Thunder snow?

    i think we wetbulb

    wet bulb is when the precipitation hits the ground as a result of drying out atmosphere. It could turn a normally warmer airmass cool down abruptly. Another thing is we’re going to heavy straight heavy snow for 6 hours it looks like. And once we hit night the models may get iffy on seeing the cold air from nightfall. No sun definitely helps put it that way. Regardless I think we get a good thump of at least 2 but could go as high as 5-6 inches if things go best where most of the heavy precipitation falls as snow and we get a few light showers of either sleet or freezing drizzle. It could turn obviously into rain too but notice when nighttime hits on models we get a flash of chilled air, and as the low is intensifying resulting thunder snow!?

    93494833-7CF9-4456-A4E4-F5404F1A5DA5.png

    • Haha 1
  7. 1 minute ago, Brasiluvsnow said:

    FYI I could be wrong but I believe you said an Inch and a half way back pages ago in your wager, IF IM wrong so be it but some guys in here are really nitpickers so I don't want you to have to disappear for a month over .50 or a half = just a weenie trying to help you out now back to our program

    Bet is 1 1/2 but I think we get 2

×
×
  • Create New...