Sundog
-
Posts
12,054 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Sundog
-
Wouldn't being under the trees reduce radiational cooling, which still happens a bit in the park, especially with snowcover?
-
2.44 total, very solid -
Nobody told the NAM: This is the 18z run! This is so bad
- 246 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- heavy rain
- damaging wind? squalls?
- (and 2 more)
-
The 18z NAM was laughably bad, wow It has just a few tenths TOTAL for Boston and SW of there. The radar meanwhile is LOADED
-
The radar out way east and KBOX looks insane
-
2.25 inches here after this deluge worked its way through. Very satisfied. Also happy that winds have completely died.
- 246 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- heavy rain
- damaging wind? squalls?
- (and 2 more)
-
Heavy rain but bizarrely calm winds. It's dead calm.
-
The wind is ferocious in Queens
-
It's really windy
-
I remember them closer to Thanksgiving, and it was usually mini snow squalls/flurries streaming in from the NW
-
What do you think the winds will be like in NYC tomorrow afternoon? I don't want the kids walking around for Halloween with tree limbs snapping.
- 246 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- heavy rain
- damaging wind? squalls?
- (and 2 more)
-
I have been complaining about the trees in Central Park for YEARS, trust me I am on board with this issue. I just didn't think this problem stretched this deep into fall. I can understand May through mid September. So are you saying Central Park should have a HIGHER overall October average than Newark?
-
Can the tree growth really be making that much of a difference in October with the lower insolation if the park is basically the same as torchy Newark to its west? 59.3 vs 59.6, those are awfully close and Newark doesn't suffer from tree shade AND they are farther west.
-
Every model had the rain to your west at this time, Any rain you get will be from what forms this afternoon.
-
How could the 1961-1990 time period be affected by tree growth? Maybe the 1971-2000 a little but that would have been at the tail end of the period. Either way the 1931-1960 and 1941-1970 periods in Central Park were even warmer than Newark's current average, which is impressive.
-
You'd have to be pretty young to have experienced and recollect nothing good. I'd say the last true winter blast of a season was 2014-2015. I guess if there are 15 year olds posting they'd be too young to remember.
-
I live in NYC, it's the opposite of charmed. Charmed living starts north of 287, although traffic is getting worse there I hear We can barely muster up any excitement for tomorrow's system since rain wise it looks to have a shaft zone right through the tristate. Not much to talk about!
-
I have two in fact I am the boss, you get up when I tell you lol Or at least my wife does. I can't think of a more depressing thing than leaving work and it's already nighttime.
-
Who cares what they want lol And what's wrong with going to work in the dark? Do you like driving home from work in the dark? The day is already over before you even get home. F that
-
Unless it snows at night, then the delicate children will be safely indoors exposed to 2000 lumens
-
The children!
-
1931-1960 average was 58.3 degrees 1941-1970 average was 58.7 degrees Both easily warmer than the last two periods not affected by tree growth: 1961-1990: 57.5 degrees 1971-2000: 57.1 degrees
-
I can't believe it's that time of year again, BRIAN
-
If those four torch days didn't happen Central Park would have finished below normal even when going by the 1981-2010 standards. When I calculated the 30 year averages going way back, I found the 1931-1960 and 1941-1970 averages for October warmer than today's FYI.
-
Those four days in the 80s added about +1.4 degrees to the monthly average in Central Park, even more in other locations.
