Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

Jan 19-20: Hoosier is not allowed to start this thread


mimillman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Obviously southern convection can rob cold sector precip, but can it also force the low to form/kinda tug it more south or straight east as it moves along?
That can happen, but the exact track of the consoliated surface low might not matter as much if the convection forces much of the warm sector precip to shoot eastward. That plus a more limited duration of sufficient moisture in the DGZ would really truncate the time window of accumulating snow.

A problem I'm seeing with the double barrelled low is that it holding on longer ties some of the deformation type precip to that low, with a massive dry slot surging northward. Loop 700 mb RH to see the effects of the dry slot. By the time better moisture wraps back in, the forcing weakens as the consolidated surface low to the east exits off to the northeast. Also that western low may have a pretty wound up 850 mb low resulting in warmer thermal profiles (ie. 12z GEM and 06z Euro).



Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's the south trend when we need it?

I do wonder if this may be less prone to trending materially south than other storms we have seen.  A lot of times when the models trend south, it's because they botched a phase.  We don't really have that kind of setup this time.  Not that it still couldn't trend south though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where's the south trend when we need it?
I do wonder if this may be less prone to trending materially south than other storms we have seen.  A lot of times when the models trend south, it's because they botched a phase.  We don't really have that kind of setup this time.  Not that it still couldn't trend south though.
The element that needs to change is the 850 mb low from the initial Plains sfc low tracking so far north. Even though a stronger surface low eventually evolves farther east, the current forecast 850 mb low path will make it tough to get good snow farther south.

Plus the air mass is marginal to begin with, especially with southward extent. In addition, early maturing of the Plains low with a messy transfer and early dry slot intrusion (before considering how warm sector convection might interfere) look to cut into accums even where it does snow.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sbnwx85 said:

Punting this one. The next one looks too far north at this time, too, but we’ll see. At least there are storms to track. 

This.

Pattern looks to remain active, with the gradient being somewhere around the area.  Throw enough stuff at the wall and something is bound to stick at some point, especially for those of us north of 40N.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

The element that needs to change is the 850 mb low from the initial Plains sfc low tracking so far north. Even though a stronger surface low eventually evolves farther east, the current forecast 850 mb low path will make it tough to get good snow farther south.

Plus the air mass is marginal to begin with, especially with southward extent. In addition, early maturing of the Plains low with a messy transfer and early dry slot intrusion (before considering how warm sector convection might interfere) look to cut into accums even where it does snow.

Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk
 

Yeah, the progged 850 mb low track is not going to work for us.  Need an adjustment.

The 850 mb 0C line is already north of I-80 in our region even while the 850 mb low is back in Kansas.  While there is better antecedent cold than there was for the system that recently moved through, it's still pretty pathetic.  There probably won't be the classic "front end thump" with this anywhere, because it's simply too warm.  You start as snow, you'll likely be mostly snow.  You start as rain, you'll likely be mostly rain.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, dmc76 said:

What is suggesting that ?

The general theme with storms at this range have been for them to trend weaker/SE (thus getting sheared apart) with time as models keep underestimating how progressive the flow is.

This system *COULD* defy that trend given the strength of the jet streak involved and the wave being more compact than others, which is why it does have big dog potential for places such as Milwaukee, Des Moines and Northern Michigan. But the wave following closely on its heels and the residual blocking/confluence across Ontario/Quebec are both concerning.

Regardless of the outcome, it's likely going to end up being an underwhelming storm for majority of folks on here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, StormChaser4Life said:

#torch

your local forecast:

WEDNESDAY NIGHT  
RAIN IN THE EVENING, THEN RAIN LIKELY WITH  
SNOW AFTER MIDNIGHT. LITTLE OR NO SNOW ACCUMULATION. LOWS IN THE  
MID 30S. CHANCE OF PRECIPITATION 90 PERCENT.    
THURSDAY  
MOSTLY CLOUDY. A CHANCE OF RAIN AND SNOW IN THE  
MORNING. NEAR STEADY TEMPERATURE IN THE MID 30S. CHANCE OF  
PRECIPITATION 50 PERCENT.  

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Baum said:

your local forecast:

WEDNESDAY NIGHT  
RAIN IN THE EVENING, THEN RAIN LIKELY WITH  
SNOW AFTER MIDNIGHT. LITTLE OR NO SNOW ACCUMULATION. LOWS IN THE  
MID 30S. CHANCE OF PRECIPITATION 90 PERCENT.    
THURSDAY  
MOSTLY CLOUDY. A CHANCE OF RAIN AND SNOW IN THE  
MORNING. NEAR STEADY TEMPERATURE IN THE MID 30S. CHANCE OF  
PRECIPITATION 50 PERCENT.  

Yep not expecting anything. Story of this winter so far. Lol

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, StormChaser4Life said:

Yep not expecting anything. Story of this winter so far. Lol

I'm not sure your area was ever in the game here. But a torch for the Wednesday/ Thursday time period is an exaggeration per your current forecast. Slightly above average with a good chance of rain might be more realistic, 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Baum said:

I'm not sure your area was ever in the game here. But a torch for the Wednesday/ Thursday time period is an exaggeration per your current forecast. Slightly above average with a good chance of rain might be more realistic, 

I don't think you picked up on my sarcasm sir. Lol. I know my area was never really in play. At best looked like rain/snow mix ending in light snow accumulation. But I was joking with torch because latest runs look mostly like a miserable cold rain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

observation: The Milwaukee NWS office has perhaps the most bland AFD write ups I have ever seen. Perhaps it's from being mesmerized by staring out the window  at the palm trees in the perpetual 33 and cloudy climate of their tropical paradise.

download (13).png

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...