Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

2/13 Light/Moderate Snowfall Nowcasting & Observations


Northof78
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Rjay pinned this topic
2 minutes ago, HeadInTheClouds said:

Models still trying to figure this out. I don't think the end result will be like either the CMC or Euro, somewhere in between possibly. I could see a scenario where coast gets 4-8 and N and W 1-3, something like that. 

what is your definition of "coast" and "N and W" ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, HeadInTheClouds said:

Models still trying to figure this out. I don't think the end result will be like either the CMC or Euro, somewhere in between possibly. I could see a scenario where coast gets 4-8 and N and W 1-3, something like that. 

BTW the 12z UKMET showed a 1 to 2 inch snowfall. Yeah it's quite a model spread right now. Euro barely brushes us while GGEM is too ampted and rain. GFS in between, showing a significant snow event. Hopefully we will see an in between scenario as you mentioned. Hopefully we'll have a good idea by friday. Always seems to take awhile for the models to agree.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, NorthShoreWx said:

True.  To make a technical point, your part of the Island is pretty close to the same latitude as Mt Kisco.

Yeah but we don't have anywhere near the maritime influence up here unless the wind is just right. I do see quite a bit on an ESE wind but I think a lot of that is due to being on the eastern aspect of the lower Taconics, I'll also be affected by backdoor fronts a lot more than they are 10 miles west of me.. If the prevailing winds are W, NW or NE my weather will be more continental than coastal. I'm ~10 miles north of Mt Kisco and a few hundred feet up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Monmouth_County_Jacpot said:

One run is not a cave. SMH 

True, but def not what you want either. Saving grace is it’s the 18z run which doesn’t have as much data as 0 and 12, though someone posted some research during the last threat which shows that less doesn’t affect forecasting ability. Wonder if no data would lead to similar forecasting ability…

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, romba said:

True, but def not what you want either. Saving grace is it’s the 18z run which doesn’t have as much data as 0 and 12, though someone posted some research during the last threat which shows that less doesn’t affect forecasting ability. Wonder if no data would lead to similar forecasting ability…

No it's been proven by research Yang did that the 6z and 18z are significantly worse in the NH at longer lead times 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

anyone who takes 6z or 18z runs of the GFS seriously has no clue how low the verification scores of those runs are, I posted a whole PDF about those a week ago.

 

I guess I misunderstood it, thought the conclusion was there was less data but the forecasting impact was minimal…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Northof78 changed the title to 2/13 Light/Moderate Snowfall Nowcasting & Observations
  • BxEngine unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...