Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Powerful Multi-regional/ multi-faceted east coastal storm now above medium confidence: Jan 29 -30th, MA to NE, with snow and mix combining high wind, and tides. Unusual early confidence ...


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, tiger_deF said:

What would be more satisfying to the board; to see solutions converge West and more intense after staying relatively weaker and more Eastern, or to see the same strong, intense storm modelled with only small wobbles up until the start time?

There are two boards, even three, within this subforum...so you're going to get 2-3 different set of answers. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Depends on when the 70/30 compromise happens though. Yesterday would have been awesome lol. But If euro ticks east more then today's compromise is no longer good for wsne., 

This will be similar to January 2015 and I know that spooks you.   But didn’t your now location do pretty well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CT Valley Dryslot said:

Give it to me hot and heavy.

My sister lives in Vernon, and she doesn’t really like big storms due to shoveling aspects, so will be interested in your obs so I can know what she is facing without exposing her to my desire for as strong a storm as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well... this will be interesting as the Euro rolls out.  Some quick orbital perspectives:

-- the Euro has not been as stable as we may think. It's been decent with position. It's not consistent with intensity - this latter aspect is trending shallower. In fact, we're 15 mb less deep now compared to 24 or so hours ago. That gradual decline means the governing aspect/wave mechanics are weakening over time, eventually - this model could break E and join the less proficiently phased GFS, if it gets to teetering with a weaker threshold.

-- considering this is D3 at the start, to D4 ( or so) finishing;  the average error at the front side of that range ( I think) is 150 to 200 mi. At the end of that range it would open up even more. It would help people's confidence for higher impact if the GFS model, and whichever ... would stop pressing against the eastern side of that range.

-- there are arguments in support of either erstwhile solution envelopes.  Pending this 12z run, if the Euro more than less holds ... it would be about as cut and dry a model fight as we've seen, and doing so D3/4 is interesting - that's a neat case, particularly for this era of technology. It's not like this is D5+ anymore.  

-- they could suddenly coalesce on an eastern solution, then, en masse, come back when the wave mechanics start carving S along the eastern flanks of the western ridge later Thursday.  Sometimes just doing that, and the intensity adds back..  Anecdotal memory -

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Navy appears to have shifted west, at h5 it has a closed off low and 2 closed contours instead of only one. Rule of thumb is a foot of a snow for each closed contour (Bernie Rayno talked about it on his livestream, the Euro actually had 3 closed contours). Interestingly the gfs has 3 as well as it goes over the cape and 5 downeast Maine (so it’s surface output is likely bullshit verbatim). The Canadian has only one, which is why it makes sense that the snow totals are lower on that. Nam has 5 closed contours as it crosses over nantucket. Euro last night had 3. 

  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...