Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Widespread Snow Potential January 16th to January 18th


sferic
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, CoolMikeWx said:

Poor nothing for those Mid-Atlantic folks, they just got a nice storm a week ago and we all missed out.:lol:

Sorry, I should have put an ellipsis after that... If you can't tell, I'm pretty sarcastic. lol

Earlier this year, I wished "10 dustings on them" for their winter total. Mother nature punished me and gave me all the dustings for a month. :P

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rochesterdave said:

That UKIE is perfect! Tick it just a touch east to get more of the forum in.  I still think 81 corridor is the sweet spot. 100 miles either side. This one is going to have a bigger QPF field. Just don’t want dry slotting. 
But the best part is that GEFS caved!

This one is gonna be juicy with it being a Miller A - draws up all sorts of moisture from the Gulf...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Little bit outdated..

 

Model guidance for the 12/18Z cycle (and the incoming 00Z cycle) shows a similar idea to the previous couple of cycles of model guidance with the impactful surface low in the East--that is, a low track as described above staying onshore in the deterministic guidance, but with the GEFS and EC ensemble means showing a track offshore, while individual ensemble members demonstrate considerable spread in low placement, with certainly some ensemble members along the coast or inland. Again, while model guidance exhibits good agreement for a strengthening low, the exact low track will create significant differences in weather type at certain locations, especially near the Atlantic coast to about the I-95 corridor. The 12/18/00Z GFS along with the 12/00Z CMC all show a track basically on the western side of the guidance envelope (well inland over the northern Mid-Atlantic Monday morning), with the 12Z ECMWF a bit farther east but still onshore. Felt it prudent to continue with a low track in between the western deterministic guidance and the eastern EC and GEFS ensemble mean guidance, but somewhat favoring the fairly well clustered deterministic models. The best proxy for this at the time of forecast creation was close to the 12Z ECMWF and the 12Z CMC ensemble mean; the 12Z CMC ensemble mean along with the incoming 00Z CMC mean are the first ensemble means to show an onshore track with the low. This led to a surface low basically over Philadelphia on Monday morning, which was a very minor shift farther inland/west compared to continuity. Hopefully models will converge and confidence will increase within the next day for the exact low track, as the shortwave energy leading to this system will enter the Pacific Northwest/southwestern Canada and have better data sampling for input into the model guidance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rochesterdave said:

That UKIE is perfect! Tick it just a touch east to get more of the forum in.  I still think 81 corridor is the sweet spot. 100 miles either side. This one is going to have a bigger QPF field. Just don’t want dry slotting. 
But the best part is that GEFS caved!

Eh, I don't know. The Euro, GFS, Canadian, and now Ukie all have Wester NY as the jackpot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TugHillMatt said:

Eh, I don't know. The Euro, GFS, Canadian, and now Ukie all have Wester NY as the jackpot.

Just where we want it 3 days out.

I think your area, from Syracuse east to 81 and down to BGM is the jackpot.

I may have a dry slot issue here in Otsego but not the snow hole currently depicted.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, vortmax said:

With a last minute SE correction, I think ROC-SYR are jackpots (w/lollies), but everyone here easily gets 6"+ on either side. Ratios should be 15:1 ish.

Barring future corrections, I doubt I see 6" this far east, but anything over 2" will be my heaviest "storm" this season. So this should be a net gain, even here. I do agree with your max area though, especially towards SYR.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stash said:

Barring future corrections, I doubt I see 6" this far east, but anything over 2" will be my heaviest "storm" this season. So this should be a net gain, even here. I do agree with your max area though, especially towards SYR.

ENY is a little far east to guarantee 6" with the , but you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just catching up and thought this was cool from KBUF, have to go look up those storms now

Storms of this nature have a history of
generating widespread snow throughout all of western and north
central New York. Similar sfc patterns occurred with the following
storms: 2/13/93, 12/29/97, 1/12/96, 2/23/98, 12/11/92 and 2/12/85.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...