Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

January 2022 Obs/Disco


NorEastermass128
 Share

Recommended Posts

One should not continue to elicit a positive angle on the MJO

Both velocity potential based MJO and RMM indices indicate an active West Pacific MJO event
with little continued eastward propagation in recent weeks.
There is disagreement among the dynamical models regarding the predicted evolution of the MJO,
leading to continued uncertainty in the outlook.
Tropical cyclone formation is favored over the southern Pacific where any coherence of the MJO is
more likely to manifest itself during the next two weeks.
While West Pacific MJO events typically favor colder than normal conditions across the CONUS,
extended range model guidance continues to mimic more of an amplified negative Pacific North
American pattern, suggestive of La Niña dominating the extratropical response over North
America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

For those questioning the mega torch…

 

 

9C3A3676-0EEF-4CCD-A2BA-51BE38F034CD.png

Now we're talking!  thats the torch you referred to earlier.  If that ends up as the mean for that period, every single met I've read is wrong about the pattern over the last month, and where it was headed.  And those are the educated ones!  The weenies, well....  But I should add that how could anyone have foreseen this progression given what the analogs and models of all kinds have been putting out?

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

One should not continue to elicit a positive angle on the MJO

Both velocity potential based MJO and RMM indices indicate an active West Pacific MJO event
with little continued eastward propagation in recent weeks.
There is disagreement among the dynamical models regarding the predicted evolution of the MJO,
leading to continued uncertainty in the outlook.
Tropical cyclone formation is favored over the southern Pacific where any coherence of the MJO is
more likely to manifest itself during the next two weeks.
While West Pacific MJO events typically favor colder than normal conditions across the CONUS,
extended range model guidance continues to mimic more of an amplified negative Pacific North
American pattern, suggestive of La Niña dominating the extratropical response over North
America.

Even if the RNA is 1-2SD....its better than the record 3SD that we have had. The hope for the first half of January is that we can cash in on the period when the NAO is relinquishing its grip en route to the thaw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

Now we're talking!  thats the torch you referred to earlier.  If that ends up as the mean for that period, every single met I've read is wrong about the pattern over the last month, and where it was headed.  And those are the educated ones!  The weenies, well....  But I should add that how could anyone have foreseen this progression given what the analogs and models of all kinds have been putting out?

But that torch is really for a day or two. Those anomalies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Now Cosgrove is saying late January/early February for any real winter weather in the northeast.

He is making no sense. He keeps saying a brief cold shot around new years than a 10-22 thaw before a very cold end of Jan and into Feb. He is saying all ensembles show an extended Jan thaw. So....since the actual ensembles only go to Jan 13 (showing cold)....and the cfs and euro weeklies show cold...what is he looking at?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

One should not continue to elicit a positive angle on the MJO

Both velocity potential based MJO and RMM indices indicate an active West Pacific MJO event
with little continued eastward propagation in recent weeks.
There is disagreement among the dynamical models regarding the predicted evolution of the MJO,
leading to continued uncertainty in the outlook.
Tropical cyclone formation is favored over the southern Pacific where any coherence of the MJO is
more likely to manifest itself during the next two weeks.
While West Pacific MJO events typically favor colder than normal conditions across the CONUS,
extended range model guidance continues to mimic more of an amplified negative Pacific North
American pattern, suggestive of La Niña dominating the extratropical response over North
America.

I enjoy reading those. This pesky west pacific very warm pool seems to have been driving the bus. 

OlrPsiWaf_tp200hPa_20211226.thumb.gif.aa8688927bb3f029b1d481d7aa742ebf.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

He is making no sense. He keeps saying a brief cold shot around new years than a 10-22 thaw before a very cold end of Jan and into Feb. He is saying all ensembles show an extended Jan thaw. So....since the actual ensembles only go to Jan 13 (showing cold)....and the cfs and euro weeklies show cold...what is he looking at?

His colon.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, michsnowfreak said:

He is making no sense. He keeps saying a brief cold shot around new years than a 10-22 thaw before a very cold end of Jan and into Feb. He is saying all ensembles show an extended Jan thaw. So....since the actual ensembles only go to Jan 13 (showing cold)....and the cfs and euro weeklies show cold...what is he looking at?

He’s drunk. The dude is never right . Similar to DT

-He’s not dealing with it 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Now Cosgrove is saying late January/early February for any real winter weather in the northeast.

 

1 hour ago, michsnowfreak said:

He is making no sense. He keeps saying a brief cold shot around new years than a 10-22 thaw before a very cold end of Jan and into Feb. He is saying all ensembles show an extended Jan thaw. So....since the actual ensembles only go to Jan 13 (showing cold)....and the cfs and euro weeklies show cold...what is he looking at?

I am usually a pretty big fan of Larry Cosgrove and he has been very good the last few years but he is clearly kicking the can down the road from his earlier thoughts. I have a suspicion DT (WxRisk) may be walking back his recent thoughts on the cold and snow potential as well if the pattern doesn't change soon.

  • Thanks 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weathafella said:

The people bashing Cosgrove haven’t been following him the past few years….or they’re bitter for some reason.

To be clear I'm not bashing cosgrove, i like him. i'm just wondering where he is seeing this alleged mid Jan thaw on the long range models. I have weatherbell and the end of the ensembles, as well as euro and cfs weeklies...couldn't be further from a thaw east of the rockies (at least in the North). If he feels they're wrong or whatever, fine, but we must be looking at different models lol. Not wish casting either because I actually like where I stand in the lakes for storminess...just wondering when that extreme cold to the west will bleed over for a longer spell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...