Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jm1220 said:

Seems that when we can get a good snow event in December it’s a good predictor of a higher than average snow season. Last year we had the Dec snow event where most of us had 6”+ and we mostly ended above 40” for the winter. In 2010-11 we had the big 12/26/10 event and we ended up well above average. But in other winters where December has little, we usually end up below average. I’m sure Don/Bluewave etc can produce better stats on this but we want for at least some decent event in Dec. Nina winters also generally are front loaded. 

Oh I'm mostly talking about 10"+ events in December which seem to be very rare now.  I was thinking of winters like 2014-15 where we get our first big snows around Jan 20th, that seems to be a common first date for our first big snow of the season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jm1220 said:

Seems that when we can get a good snow event in December it’s a good predictor of a higher than average snow season. Last year we had the Dec snow event where most of us had 6”+ and we mostly ended above 40” for the winter. In 2010-11 we had the big 12/26/10 event and we ended up well above average. But in other winters where December has little, we usually end up below average. I’m sure Don/Bluewave etc can produce better stats on this but we want for at least some decent event in Dec. Nina winters also generally are front loaded. 

As long as NYC gets 3” or more in a coupled La Niña December since the 1995, it usually does well in the seasonal snowfall department. It’s the few years like 2011-2012, 2007-2008, 1999-2000, and 1998-1999 that came up short. 

Coupled La Ninas since 1995 bolded

 

Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Year
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Season
2020-2021 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.1 26.0 T 0.0 38.6
2019-2020 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.3 T T T 4.8
2018-2019 0.0 6.4 T 1.1 2.6 10.4 0.0 20.5
2017-2018 0.0 T 7.7 11.2 4.9 11.6 5.5 40.9
2016-2017 0.0 T 3.2 7.9 9.4 9.7 0.0 30.2
2015-2016 0.0 0.0 T 27.9 4.0 0.9 T 32.8
2014-2015 0.0 0.2 1.0 16.9 13.6 18.6 0.0 50.3
2013-2014 0.0 T 8.6 19.7 29.0 0.1 T 57.4
2012-2013 0.0 4.7 0.4 1.5 12.2 7.3 0.0 26.1
2011-2012 2.9 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 7.4
2010-2011 0.0 T 20.1 36.0 4.8 1.0 T 61.9
2009-2010 0.0 0.0 12.4 2.1 36.9 T 0.0 51.4
2008-2009 0.0 T 6.0 9.0 4.3 8.3 T 27.6
2007-2008 0.0 T 2.9 T 9.0 T 0.0 11.9
2006-2007 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 3.8 6.0 T 12.4
2005-2006 0.0 T 9.7 2.0 26.9 1.3 0.1 40.0
2004-2005 0.0 T 3.0 15.3 15.8 6.9 0.0 41.0
2003-2004 0.0 0.0 19.8 17.3 0.7 4.8 0.0 42.6
2002-2003 T T 11.0 4.7 26.1 3.5 4.0 49.3
2001-2002 0.0 0.0 T 3.5 T T T 3.5
2000-2001 T 0.0 13.4 8.3 9.5 3.8 0.0 35.0
1999-2000 0.0 0.0 T 9.5 5.2 0.4 1.2 16.3
1998-1999 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.5 1.7 4.5 0.0 12.7
1997-1998 0.0 T T 0.5 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.5
1996-1997 0.0 0.1 T 4.4 3.8 1.7 T 10.0
1995-1996 0.0 2.9 11.5 26.1 21.2 13.2 0.7 75.6
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

Oh I'm mostly talking about 10"+ events in December which seem to be very rare now.  I was thinking of winters like 2014-15 where we get our first big snows around Jan 20th, that seems to be a common first date for our first big snow of the season.

 

Knyc has 10.5 in the December storm last year 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, bluewave said:

As long as NYC gets 3” or more in a coupled La Niña December since the 1995, it usually does well in the seasonal snowfall department. It’s the few years like 2011-2012, 2007-2008, 1999-2000, and 1998-1999 that came up short. So the hope this year is that we can find a way to make it to phase 7 at some point in December  and sneak in a 3”+ event before the start of January.

Coupled La Ninas since 1995 bolded

 

Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Year
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Season
2020-2021 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.1 26.0 T 0.0 38.6
2019-2020 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.3 T T T 4.8
2018-2019 0.0 6.4 T 1.1 2.6 10.4 0.0 20.5
2017-2018 0.0 T 7.7 11.2 4.9 11.6 5.5 40.9
2016-2017 0.0 T 3.2 7.9 9.4 9.7 0.0 30.2
2015-2016 0.0 0.0 T 27.9 4.0 0.9 T 32.8
2014-2015 0.0 0.2 1.0 16.9 13.6 18.6 0.0 50.3
2013-2014 0.0 T 8.6 19.7 29.0 0.1 T 57.4
2012-2013 0.0 4.7 0.4 1.5 12.2 7.3 0.0 26.1
2011-2012 2.9 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 7.4
2010-2011 0.0 T 20.1 36.0 4.8 1.0 T 61.9
2009-2010 0.0 0.0 12.4 2.1 36.9 T 0.0 51.4
2008-2009 0.0 T 6.0 9.0 4.3 8.3 T 27.6
2007-2008 0.0 T 2.9 T 9.0 T 0.0 11.9
2006-2007 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 3.8 6.0 T 12.4
2005-2006 0.0 T 9.7 2.0 26.9 1.3 0.1 40.0
2004-2005 0.0 T 3.0 15.3 15.8 6.9 0.0 41.0
2003-2004 0.0 0.0 19.8 17.3 0.7 4.8 0.0 42.6
2002-2003 T T 11.0 4.7 26.1 3.5 4.0 49.3
2001-2002 0.0 0.0 T 3.5 T T T 3.5
2000-2001 T 0.0 13.4 8.3 9.5 3.8 0.0 35.0
1999-2000 0.0 0.0 T 9.5 5.2 0.4 1.2 16.3
1998-1999 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.5 1.7 4.5 0.0 12.7
1997-1998 0.0 T T 0.5 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.5
1996-1997 0.0 0.1 T 4.4 3.8 1.7 T 10.0
1995-1996 0.0 2.9 11.5 26.1 21.2 13.2 0.7 75.6

what about 2016-17?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bluewave said:

As long as NYC gets 3” or more in a coupled La Niña December since the 1995, it usually does well in the seasonal snowfall department. It’s the few years like 2011-2012, 2007-2008, 1999-2000, and 1998-1999 that came up short. So the hope this year is that we can find a way to make it to phase 7 at some point in December  and sneak in a 3”+ event before the start of January.

Coupled La Ninas since 1995 bolded

 

Monthly Total Snowfall for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Year
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Season
2020-2021 0.0 0.0 10.5 2.1 26.0 T 0.0 38.6
2019-2020 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.3 T T T 4.8
2018-2019 0.0 6.4 T 1.1 2.6 10.4 0.0 20.5
2017-2018 0.0 T 7.7 11.2 4.9 11.6 5.5 40.9
2016-2017 0.0 T 3.2 7.9 9.4 9.7 0.0 30.2
2015-2016 0.0 0.0 T 27.9 4.0 0.9 T 32.8
2014-2015 0.0 0.2 1.0 16.9 13.6 18.6 0.0 50.3
2013-2014 0.0 T 8.6 19.7 29.0 0.1 T 57.4
2012-2013 0.0 4.7 0.4 1.5 12.2 7.3 0.0 26.1
2011-2012 2.9 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 7.4
2010-2011 0.0 T 20.1 36.0 4.8 1.0 T 61.9
2009-2010 0.0 0.0 12.4 2.1 36.9 T 0.0 51.4
2008-2009 0.0 T 6.0 9.0 4.3 8.3 T 27.6
2007-2008 0.0 T 2.9 T 9.0 T 0.0 11.9
2006-2007 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 3.8 6.0 T 12.4
2005-2006 0.0 T 9.7 2.0 26.9 1.3 0.1 40.0
2004-2005 0.0 T 3.0 15.3 15.8 6.9 0.0 41.0
2003-2004 0.0 0.0 19.8 17.3 0.7 4.8 0.0 42.6
2002-2003 T T 11.0 4.7 26.1 3.5 4.0 49.3
2001-2002 0.0 0.0 T 3.5 T T T 3.5
2000-2001 T 0.0 13.4 8.3 9.5 3.8 0.0 35.0
1999-2000 0.0 0.0 T 9.5 5.2 0.4 1.2 16.3
1998-1999 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.5 1.7 4.5 0.0 12.7
1997-1998 0.0 T T 0.5 0.0 5.0 0.0 5.5
1996-1997 0.0 0.1 T 4.4 3.8 1.7 T 10.0
1995-1996 0.0 2.9 11.5 26.1 21.2 13.2 0.7 75.6

so 2016-17 just made it over the 3 inch mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LibertyBell said:

Yup December seems to pretty much be lost as a winter month

Since 2010's Boxing Day storm we haven't seen much winter in December.

 

that isn’t hard and fast. Last December for instance.

The Boxing Day storm was a major storm…but there have been several December snows since then.

What we have lost is extended cold weather in December. If you want to look at a month that’s lost to a season I’ll give you September. But December isnt quite there yet.

Ironically the warmer Decembers have been coupled with cooler Novembers.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The colder day 15 EPS last night is a great example of how MJO sensitive the early December pattern may be. The 0z EPS weakens the MJO rather than the weeklies stronger wave. So this allows the Aleutians ridge to poke up closer to the Arctic. The newer EPS is actually closer to La Niña climo than what the weeklies snowed yesterday. So another example of how we really have to wait until December gets started to see the true atmospheric response will be. The stronger La Niña 5-6 phases usually hold off until after December.

New colder run
 

77C6876E-E1F5-4E88-890B-0CE6E0B482BB.thumb.png.20f47fa08259fd0b23c7662eac54fefc.png

Weaker MJO

82E67C0A-155F-4F81-9B4E-D18D2BE115DD.gif.7fe2a6dd47e2a5681ff9eeb69682d54e.gif

Older weeklies stronger MJO

 

6C81DAFF-56D1-4E0E-9566-BD79A31B1CB9.gif.a7e9bb093eea8e66280127692f4ddbc4.gif

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluewave said:

The colder day 15 EPS last night is a great example of how MJO sensitive the early December pattern may be. The 0z EPS weakens the MJO rather than the weeklies stronger wave. So this allows the Aleutians ridge to poke up closer to the Arctic. The newer EPS is actually closer to La Niña climo than what the weeklies snowed yesterday. So another example of how we really have to wait until December gets started to see the true atmospheric response will be. The stronger La Niña 5-6 phases usually hold off until after December.

New colder run
 

77C6876E-E1F5-4E88-890B-0CE6E0B482BB.thumb.png.20f47fa08259fd0b23c7662eac54fefc.png

Weaker MJO

82E67C0A-155F-4F81-9B4E-D18D2BE115DD.gif.7fe2a6dd47e2a5681ff9eeb69682d54e.gif

Older weeklies stronger MJO

 

6C81DAFF-56D1-4E0E-9566-BD79A31B1CB9.gif.a7e9bb093eea8e66280127692f4ddbc4.gif

 

 

 

The EPS is flip flopping horribly in the long range, wild run to run swings. It’s definitely not what it used to be. It’s had a very severe cold bias in the long range for the last several years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

The EPS is flip flopping horribly in the long range, wild run to run swings. It’s definitely not what it used to be. It’s had a very severe cold bias in the long range for the last several years

Big model war on the 0z guidance for early December. The EPS and GEPS are colder with the Aleutians ridge building toward the Arctic. The GEFS is flatter and warmer with a  faster Pacific Jet. That poleward Aleutians ridge matches December La Niña climatology more closely since 2000.

60A1BAC1-7A09-4FF0-8A01-574DCD99F2E6.png.0eb3983e543b328c01daa6c2fd9811f2.png

 

 

 

2A980BCB-D63E-459C-8C7C-91E275836A8F.thumb.png.5d71cab25a85258cc1ea1699432eac61.png
 

B94DEE91-FA07-4B64-AD56-A2D154E9B10E.thumb.png.9c2254776f4d65ae603f620990921fa7.png

 

AA6C7664-DD20-46FF-B8C9-0113BA59E6CF.thumb.png.0e226ae4d81682f7fee7d16afb250933.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

The EPS is flip flopping horribly in the long range, wild run to run swings. It’s definitely not what it used to be. It’s had a very severe cold bias in the long range for the last several years

It's called the long range for a reason 

  • Haha 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

The EPS is flip flopping horribly in the long range, wild run to run swings. It’s definitely not what it used to be. It’s had a very severe cold bias in the long range for the last several years

And yet when it shows warm in the LR you say it must be correct. 

The AN November call will also be a flop. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

And yet when it shows warm in the LR you say it must be correct. 

The AN November call will also be a flop. 

Exactly

We will see a few days of mild temps in early December before the pattern reshuffle. Our first snowfall should be mid month. Hopefully  a white Christmas happens.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jfklganyc said:

I see Central Park still didn’t get below freezing. Must be that foliage :D

hit 32 though like JFK did

but here's a delicate question, can it be considered a freezing day if the low is above 32.0? Because 0 C (actual freezing) is 32.0 F, not 32.2 or 32.4 or anything in between?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, MJO812 said:

It's called the long range for a reason 

We will need the Aleutians ridge to put up a fight against the record Pacific Jet in December. Notice how the record jet anomalies have been parked over the Aleutians this fall. So models may struggle more than normal beyond 5 days with such a supercharged Pacific Jet.

 

257706E3-2642-4D41-BF6D-FA058AADC5FB.gif.87a4761bf570f1105749791c7a65a1a9.gif

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluewave said:

We will need the Aleutians ridge to put up a fight against the record Pacific Jet in December. Notice how the record jet anomalies have been parked over the Aleutians this fall. So models may struggle more than normal beyond 5 days with such a supercharged Pacific Jet.

 

257706E3-2642-4D41-BF6D-FA058AADC5FB.gif.87a4761bf570f1105749791c7a65a1a9.gif

 

The Pacific is more important than the NAO.  Without a good PNA the snow chances are slim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LibertyBell said:

long range forecasting beyond a few weeks isn't a science, I can show you astrology "forecasts" that are more accurate, random chances are higher than its accuracy

 

Good morning Liberty/Anthony/All. I know what you mean about the Astrology part. I’m still waiting to wake up tall, handsome and virile. As always ….

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

And yet when it shows warm in the LR you say it must be correct. 

The AN November call will also be a flop. 

Stop your trolling. I don’t trust anything the EPS shows anymore. I don’t care if it shows a freaking torch, I don’t believe it. It flips around like a fish out of water

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...