Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

February 7th Storm Threat Discussion/Obs


mappy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Serious question from a novice and my apologies in advance for my ignorance. 
I see what the models are projecting, and get there will be low dews and can calculate a wet bulb.  Yet, with temps on Saturday around 50 during the day, clouding up during the evening, and the inability in the immediate metro to cool down even to forcasted lows most nights (supposed to be 35 last night and never dropped below 40, and even last Friday night during the “very cold” stretch barely  ducked under 25,) how will this ever be cold enough to support accumulating snow?  I have seen dynaimc heavy snow accumulate at 34-35. I get it. But how can we be sure it won’t be just cloudy at 42 heading into the event in the immediate metro? Is just robust dynamic cooling? Again, sorry if this a stupid question. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wentzadelphia said:

Before the last event on our Philly forum Tony (rainshadow) posted the model that’s supposed to be replacing the NAM soon. I forget what it’s called, but it did an amazing job. I think it begins with a C but idk lol. I’ll see if I can get a snow map off its recent run.
 

I found it...

so supposedly this will be the model replacing the NAM. This was its forecast before the last event

22868309-22A0-4B2E-B526-A8E525AA9447.gif

So, what is it showing now?  You have a link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, snowmagnet said:

Thank you for that - good to temper expectations.  Since temps are an issue, do you see this having a big impact on roads Sunday?  It sounds like it will be coming down pretty fast, but I’m wondering about accumulation on surfaces.  

I think it could coat the roads up pretty good if it comes down hard enough, even at 32-33 temps in early morning. But once it lets up, melting will occur quickly. So this will be one of those events where it’s impactful while it’s going, but once it’s done it’s done. Travel Sunday afternoon for the game should be fine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, blueberryfaygo said:

IDK if this is the case.. the red taggers are talking about "saturated dendritic growth layers" and getting everyone excited.. this could be an over performer when it comes to ratios.. 

i highly doubt that the lower eastern shore will see a foot of snow out of this. but okay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ovechkin said:

Serious question from a novice and my apologies in advance for my ignorance. 
I see what the models are projecting, and get there will be low dews and can calculate a wet bulb.  Yet, with temps on Saturday around 50 during the day, clouding up during the evening, and the inability in the immediate metro to cool down even to forcasted lows most nights (supposed to be 35 last night and never dropped below 40, and even last Friday night during the “very cold” stretch barely  ducked under 25,) how will this ever be cold enough to support accumulating snow?  I have seen dynaimc heavy snow accumulate at 34-35. I get it. But how can we be sure it won’t be just cloudy at 42 heading into the event in the immediate metro? Is just robust dynamic cooling? Again, sorry if this a stupid question. 

Where are you located in DC? I got down to 36.7 last night in NW, you didn’t get below 40. Luckily, it’s early Feb so we are in prime climo for these types of events. I would be far more worried about what you are referring to of this event was in March. Most of the models indicate heavy precipitation with cold air aloft creating an ideal situation for dynamic cooling. Most models show temps of 31-33 during the heavy snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chris21 said:

Where are you located in DC? I got down to 36.7 last night in NW, you didn’t get below 40. Luckily, it’s early Feb so we are in prime climo for these types of events. I would be far more worried about what you are referring to of this event was in March. Most of the models indicate heavy precipitation with cold air aloft creating an ideal situation for dynamic cooling. Most models show temps of 31-33 during the heavy snow.

On call last night at the VA ( North Capitol and Michigan.)  I guess I’m just worried the models bust on temps. Hope they are correct. Will be a great event if they are right! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ovechkin said:

Serious question from a novice and my apologies in advance for my ignorance. 
I see what the models are projecting, and get there will be low dews and can calculate a wet bulb.  Yet, with temps on Saturday around 50 during the day, clouding up during the evening, and the inability in the immediate metro to cool down even to forcasted lows most nights (supposed to be 35 last night and never dropped below 40, and even last Friday night during the “very cold” stretch barely  ducked under 25,) how will this ever be cold enough to support accumulating snow?  I have seen dynaimc heavy snow accumulate at 34-35. I get it. But how can we be sure it won’t be just cloudy at 42 heading into the event in the immediate metro? Is just robust dynamic cooling? Again, sorry if this a stupid question. 

You kinda answered your own question, we will wet bulb down, but the real answer is to look upstairs, look at the surface temp at DCA in this sounding from DCA, looks to be below 32 at  anything above 1000mb.  Heavy rates and you get a beat down, light rates and it’s snow/rain or rain.   Your concerns are all valid though, we have seen many a marginal situations bust, and a few boom.  Learn to read soundings and skew-t charts, will be super helpful! 

 
image.thumb.png.7edf94f808c37ac06fb007d93e8cacfa.png

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, blueberryfaygo said:

IDK if this is the case.. the red taggers are talking about "saturated dendritic growth layers" and getting everyone excited.. this could be an over performer when it comes to ratios.. 

What's the canadian say?  It seemed to have a lot of dendritic growth for last weekend's storm...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CAPE said:

If those areas are prime, my yard should be. I usually do better than those areas in marginal temp events because I am further E/NE and away from any moderating influences from the bay.

What do you figure the liquid/snow ratios will be? Even if there is good lift through the DGZ, the lower level temps are super marginal, so I would think maybe 7:1?

I'm thinking 8-10:1 given the mid-level frontogen involved with the wave. The s/w is still fairly prolific on guidance right now and there's going to be significant large scale ascent from the 25H jet amplifying to the north. I think one of the things the globals are not going to pick up on is that meso banding is all but a given with the current 7H progs. The 7H fronto AND 85H fronto will actually work in your favor, so you'll have deeper boundary layer lift compared to areas north and west. They have the mid-level fronto, but eastern shore will likely cash on both, which is why I like your spot, Easton, Kent Island, down to Cambridge as the local jack with central DE as another good spot pending the northern latitude push of the surface low along the coast. I'm rooting for you!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

I'm thinking 8-10:1 given the mid-level frontogen involved with the wave. The s/w is still fairly prolific on guidance right now and there's going to be significant large scale ascent from the 25H jet amplifying to the north. I think one of the things the globals are not going to pick up on is that meso banding is all but a given with the current 7H progs. The 7H fronto AND 85H fronto will actually work in your favor, so you'll have deeper boundary layer lift compared to areas north and west. They have the mid-level fronto, but eastern shore will likely cash on both, which is why I like your spot, Easton, Kent Island, down to Cambridge as the local jack with central DE as another good spot pending the northern latitude push of the surface low along the coast. I'm rooting for you!

woot woot!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ravens94 said:

Not trying to make a entire discussion about the SREF but using SPC maps it's further NW and appears wetter for sure

People dog on the SREF's all the time, but if you don't pay attention to the ridiculous members (which is pretty obvious when you look at the charts), it's pretty accurate and gives you a great idea of what to expect. It did a really nice job with our last storm at least for my area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF unpinned and pinned this topic
  • WxUSAF unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...