Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,505
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Dano62
    Newest Member
    Dano62
    Joined

Jan 24-26th Something Potential


Chicago Storm
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Stebo said:

I would take this and move it north. Too much biting of one run shifting south on a few models while others staying consistent or still moving north.

Fair enough, but they’re all kinda trending toward each other. If you look back 24-48 hours ago, Euro had the heaviest snow in WI while GFS was south of Indy. That drawing was most def not based on one run. 
 

I may have short changed IA a bit there due to the limits of what I was drawing with. Could be more E-W oriented as the wave heads NE before being shunted E by the block. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was the GEM run from 12z on January 29, 2015:

 

post-622-0-41348700-1422551051.jpg.6a24df595038151020c3175e5f750278.jpg

 

The point here is not to predict what will happen this time around, but just to show that operational model(s) can and do sometimes shift in a large way in terms of placement/qpf, even at just a few days out.

So, try to relax and just watch the model runs unfold.  Whatever will be will be.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

This was the GEM run from 12z on January 29, 2015:

 

post-622-0-41348700-1422551051.jpg.6a24df595038151020c3175e5f750278.jpg

 

The point here is not to predict what will happen this time around, but just to show that operational model(s) can and do sometimes shift in a large way in terms of placement/qpf, even at just a few days out.

So, try to relax and just watch the model runs unfold.  Whatever will be will be.

I feel like today's GEM is better than 2015's GEM though. This season I've actually been seriously considering it's solution more regularly. Not sure if when/they upgraded it relative to past years, but it seems like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, hlcater said:

I feel like today's GEM is better than 2015's GEM though. This season I've actually been seriously considering it's solution more regularly. Not sure if when/they upgraded it relative to past years, but it seems like it.

Here was the 12z Euro from January 29, 2015.

 

post-622-0-68987800-1422555651.jpg.d531458227505192427ddf8c186cb7db.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the 12z Euro ensembles, there are a few misses to my south, but about 12 misses to the north.

Overall, I am gradually becoming more optimistic.  As far as what could go wrong, still definitely much more concerned about a miss north than a miss south.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

This was the GEM run from 12z on January 29, 2015:

 

post-622-0-41348700-1422551051.jpg.6a24df595038151020c3175e5f750278.jpg

 

The point here is not to predict what will happen this time around, but just to show that operational model(s) can and do sometimes shift in a large way in terms of placement/qpf, even at just a few days out.

So, try to relax and just watch the model runs unfold.  Whatever will be will be.

 

24 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Here was the 12z Euro from January 29, 2015.

 

post-622-0-68987800-1422555651.jpg.d531458227505192427ddf8c186cb7db.jpg

must be getting old... don't remember any of this.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The synoptic pattern for GHD 2 (2015) was not really that similar to this setup. You had a strong vortex over Hudson Bay and ridging in the Southwest, neither of those is true here. Any NAO ridging then was east of Greenland (which also shows how east-based -NAOs are more favorable for big dogs in the Midwest) - here the ridge is over the northwest passages. 
 

E5BB9713-7268-46CF-9E2B-782D7B73C6BC.gif.af827bd8fcae8d630602ce04192c7fd3.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoosier said:

Can't South Bend handle this amount of snow?  You aren't South Beach.

Oh, yeah. We'll be fine. We just haven't had a major non-lake effect storm though in about three years. I work in a newsroom and the public is already getting antsy asking stupid questions and trying to compare this to the Blizzard of '78. :rolleyes:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...