Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Sunday-Monday Jan 3-4 potential rapidly intensifying ene moving nor'easter along the mid Atlantic coast with rain to snow mainly I84 to near I95 north through west of NYC


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, NEG NAO said:

IF the precip is heavy enough it could snow all the way to the coast but a a big IF could have an effect on both NFC playoff spot games in NJ and PA Sunday afternoon

I wouldn't stress out over it, there's more of a chance of getting hit by lightning from that storm than getting snow to the coast.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HeadInTheClouds said:

It's also further north and west with the low than the GFS, just like Euro and Ukie. I think NYC metro and Long island are going to see a cold rain unfortunately. I may see a few inches but it won't be all snow even by me 20 miles north of 84. 

if it's going to rain, why can't we get a warm rain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LibertyBell said:

I wouldn't stress out over it, there's more of a chance of getting hit by lightning from that storm than getting snow to the coast.

 

I disagree there is still a  low chance of flakes in the air along the coast especially since its still being  a few days away and we don't know the exact track of the storm yet

........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NEG NAO said:

I disagree there is still a  low chance of flakes in the air along the coast especially since its still being  a few days away and we don't know the exact track of the storm yet

........

oh sure flakes, I saw you talking about disruptions to football games, I figured you were talking about an MECS lol.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HeadInTheClouds said:

It's also further north and west with the low than the GFS, just like Euro and Ukie. I think NYC metro and Long island are going to see a cold rain unfortunately. I may see a few inches but it won't be all snow even by me 20 miles north of 84. 

Probably not, but I wouldn't rule out mostly snow for your area. Looks like a little northerly surface drain north and east of the HV. If we can stave off any lower-mid-level warming from the decaying primary, I think you could do fine up there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jeff Grann said:

There is a reason NYC averages less than 30" of snow a year. CP has already had 1/3rd of the yearly average in December... The least snowy month of winter. I really don't understand what you Coastal youth bitch about everytime it rains? If you got your way, you would have 7 feet a year. If you want that, you live in the wrong place. In April if you don't have another 15-20" that fell then you can bitch about not getting the snow you deserve. 

You can’t discount the fact that we are running 5+ degrees above normal with no end in sight on top of the stats you posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, HeadInTheClouds said:

It's going to be precarious even for us I84 peeps. Elevation and precip intensity will certainly help overcome marginal temps but  its going to be close for us in the valley. 

Yea that’s why I’m thinking  mostly white rain for your area but it could surprise if precip is very intense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're all on it...elevation dependent amounts..on the boards for potential of several inches high terrain snowfall...slushy 32-33F.  Long ways to go.  Not getting excited about NYC.  I just know that everyone is primed about mid month potential... however, this one is the first decent snow attempt in a while along I84 and lets see if we can this one first.  WPC latest 17z ensemble probs for 3" or more of snow. I won't comment again on his til tomorrow morning. 

 

 

Screen Shot 2020-12-31 at 1.38.32 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, wdrag said:

I think you're all on it...elevation dependent amounts..on the boards for potential of several inches high terrain snowfall...slushy 32-33F.  Long ways to go.  Not getting excited about NYC.  I just know that everyone is primed about mid month potential... however, this one is the first decent snow attempt in a while along I84 and lets see if we can this one first.  WPC latest 17z ensemble probs for 3" or more of snow. I won't comment again on his til tomorrow morning. 

So often in the past I've seen people so focused on future possibilities (which may never materialize). that they are surprised by events in the near term that sneak up on them. Coastal snow events are not very common, even marginal ones. As a snow lover I'd be carefully monitoring and rooting for this if I were in elevated NNJ, through the Hudson Highlands, up into the southern Taconics. Even the I-80, I-287, lower Hudson Valley area has a chance of whitening the ground I think.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, eduggs said:

So often in the past I've seen people so focused on future possibilities (which may never materialize). that they are surprised by events in the near term that sneak up on them. Coastal snow events are not very common, even marginal ones. As a snow lover I'd be carefully monitoring and rooting for this if I were in elevated NNJ, through the Hudson Highlands, up into the southern Taconics. Even the I-80, I-287, lower Hudson Valley area has a chance of whitening the ground I think.

Agree totally with your point. But also it’s a world of difference nyc/LI vs Hudson valley and points NW. Hudson valley can get dink and dunk storms in more so so patterns where as NYC/LI needs the right pattern and usually feasts on bigger coastal storms

 

Just look at the next two events for example nyc will likely be 100 percent rain while parts of the sub forum will end up mainly frozen for both events 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 18z NAM tracks the 700mb low to near Lake Ontario - maybe even slightly north of the Lake.  It looks a little north of other guidance with this feature. Brings a quick 3-6 hour precip. thump and then a pronounced dryslot. Followup showery precip with the decaying ULL looks to stay mostly N and W of the area. I'm not a fan of this solution but it could flash to a snow column pretty far south with those initial rates. I think it generally has the right idea with a NW primary and a tucked surface low. Obviously I'm rooting for more of a GFS type solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, HVSnowLover said:

Agree totally with your point. But also it’s a world of difference nyc/LI vs Hudson valley and points NW. Hudson valley can get dink and dunk storms in more so so patterns where as NYC/LI needs the right pattern and usually feasts on bigger coastal storms

 

Just look at the next two events for example nyc will likely be 100 percent rain while parts of the sub forum will end up mainly frozen for both events 

 

Yeah most decent events in the City, LI, and coastal NJ are preceded by an entrenched cold airmass. But I don't think you have to go very far N or W of the coast to be able to occasionally cash in our marginal events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eduggs said:

So often in the past I've seen people so focused on future possibilities (which may never materialize). that they are surprised by events in the near term that sneak up on them. Coastal snow events are not very common, even marginal ones. As a snow lover I'd be carefully monitoring and rooting for this if I were in elevated NNJ, through the Hudson Highlands, up into the southern Taconics. Even the I-80, I-287, lower Hudson Valley area has a chance of whitening the ground I think.

Agreed 100%  ... marginal but need to see FGEN mid level convergence near I84.  Too early yet, i think. Gotta go.  Thanks for the inputs. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, eduggs said:

The 18z NAM tracks the 700mb low to near Lake Ontario - maybe even slightly north of the Lake.  It looks a little north of other guidance with this feature. Brings a quick 3-6 hour precip. thump and then a pronounced dryslot. Followup showery precip with the decaying ULL looks to stay mostly N and W of the area. I'm not a fan of this solution but it could flash to a snow column pretty far south with those initial rates. I think it generally has the right idea with a NW primary and a tucked surface low. Obviously I'm rooting for more of a GFS type solution.

The new NAM solution doesn’t make sense, it’s absolutely torching the mid-levels and still printing out snow. You ain’t snowing with mid-level warmth like that. I’ll sell that run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

The new NAM solution doesn’t make sense, it’s absolutely torching the mid-levels and still printing out snow. You ain’t snowing with mid-level warmth like that. I’ll sell that run

The NAM doesn't torch 850mb until after the bulk of the precip. passes through. Before and during it actually looks supportive of snow with a little elevation and distance from the coast. Check the soundings. You might be right to discount it but to me it looks plausible. To me the synoptics suggest quick thump and then dry slot. I'd prefer something longer duration but I don't see it right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...