Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Dec 5/6th major coastal/ west Atlantic cyclogenesis ...?


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

Box AFD (Nash) with quite the self-deprecating, open voice... and a message to hobbyists to boot... some excerpts:

Models: still quite a bit of variation and the models are
struggling with exactly how a northern stream disturbance
currently diving south along the Ontario/Manitoba border and
southern stream energy across the ArkLaTex region will merge
later tomorrow...

A 50 mile difference in track, or 6 hour timing difference in
development means all the difference. What I`m trying to say
here is make sure you have big error bars around the forecast.
This is a great situation where probabilistic forecasts are much
better than a single deterministic one. But since I`ve got to
make a deterministic forecast, we`ll just have to work with it.

Scenario:... NAM is believed to be a little too far east. More or
less went with a 12z Canadian/ECMWF concept...

Snowfall: ...I went with about
7-8:1 ratios during the day Saturday. As we get into the
evening, rising to 9-11:1. For those playing at home and viewing
snowfall predictions from online weather models, please be aware
that most use a strict 10:1 ratio which will get you into
trouble more often than not. Although I`m going with the lower
snow ratios, there is an unknown if we end up getting a
mesoscale band or well developed comma head forming. If that
were to happen, that means we`ve got strong vertical motion in
the snow growth zone resulting in large dendrites and a much
higher SLR. After putting everything in a blender, I came out
with amounts over 6" across higher elevations of MA with 2-4"
widespread at lower elevations. Perhaps an 1" as you get just
inland of the coast. 

Chances of my forecast being perfect?
Pretty low. Snowfall amount probabilities suggest the potential
for 10"+ across the higher terrain. Later forecasts will
hopefully fine tune things.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weathafella said:

You should get 4-8, ORH NE 6+.  BOS SE 2-5. I’m thinking 3-6 for mby

Nice! Us old timers know how these work. I’ve got 5-10 hills and 2-4 lower elevations. Models will ebb and flow. I’d say when we wake up tomorrow theres a lot of happy people after the overnight data gets assimilated.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wxsniss said:

Box AFD (Nash) with quite the self-deprecating, open voice... and a message to hobbyists to boot... some excerpts:


Models: still quite a bit of variation and the models are
struggling with exactly how a northern stream disturbance
currently diving south along the Ontario/Manitoba border and
southern stream energy across the ArkLaTex region will merge
later tomorrow...

A 50 mile difference in track, or 6 hour timing difference in
development means all the difference. What I`m trying to say
here is make sure you have big error bars around the forecast.
This is a great situation where probabilistic forecasts are much
better than a single deterministic one. But since I`ve got to
make a deterministic forecast, we`ll just have to work with it.

Scenario:... NAM is believed to be a little too far east. More or
less went with a 12z Canadian/ECMWF concept...

Snowfall: ...I went with about
7-8:1 ratios during the day Saturday. As we get into the
evening, rising to 9-11:1. For those playing at home and viewing
snowfall predictions from online weather models, please be aware
that most use a strict 10:1 ratio which will get you into
trouble more often than not. Although I`m going with the lower
snow ratios, there is an unknown if we end up getting a
mesoscale band or well developed comma head forming. If that
were to happen, that means we`ve got strong vertical motion in
the snow growth zone resulting in large dendrites and a much
higher SLR. After putting everything in a blender, I came out
with amounts over 6" across higher elevations of MA with 2-4"
widespread at lower elevations. Perhaps an 1" as you get just
inland of the coast. 

Chances of my forecast being perfect?
Pretty low. Snowfall amount probabilities suggest the potential
for 10"+ across the higher terrain. Later forecasts will
hopefully fine tune things.

It's only funny because he's exactly perfectly correct with this approach and probably the sanest possible subjective approach as well...

I also tried to point out about the CSI/meso banding potential earlier and that's the biggest wild card in this... It doesn't matter if your snowing 7::1 if you get lightning/ thunder squall activity you'll dump excessive rates and when doing so, the ratio jumps/improves to 4/5 /hr rates....  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, KoalaBeer said:

Jackman Jackpot. You won’t hear me complain one bit if NNE gets 2ft and we are the sacrificial lamb in SNE. I just want to ride and hopefully do some backcountry stiff soon with all the COVID restrictions at resorts. Still a wild amount of solutions on the table this far out.  

Having no frost or frozen ground sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...