Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

December 2020 Discussion


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

As long as the pig doesn’t return we would have our chances even if the ridge retros into AK. 

 

1 minute ago, CoastalWx said:

The area near and NE of Hudson Bay as actually improved on guidance. 

Lot of weakness in the NAO regions...esp back toward N Quebec and Hudson. That’s good. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

As long as the pig doesn’t return we would have our chances even if the ridge retros into AK. 

 

Lot of weakness in the NAO regions...esp back toward N Quebec and Hudson. That’s good. 

Yeah maybe there’s a chance of NAO ridging there. Ensembles will mute it this far out, but signal is there for now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

And there's or boy! Gotta love his pessimism. Lol

He’s usually a complete weenie optimist that goes into wishcast mode in winter. I think he’s trying the reverse psychology thing this year after last year’s dud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of the above.

I’ve been worried about an awful winter and the last few days of modelology admittedly held some promise for at least a chance of a cold enough pattern for a week or so for snow before more Pac puke. I’m just very very worried . I’ve been thinking in back of mind we’d see modeling revert back to the awful look . 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

None of the above.

I’ve been worried about an awful winter and the last few days of modelology admittedly held some promise for at least a chance of a cold enough pattern for a week or so for snow before more Pac puke. I’m just very very worried . I’ve been thinking in back of mind we’d see modeling revert back to the awful look . 

Your like a chick w baggage . Can’t let the snow and hope in, for fear of the pig returning and breaking your heart .

  • Like 1
  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

And there's or boy! Gotta love his pessimism. Lol

As I explained a couple days ago, it’s a Phishing expedition.   He said those things, so that Will and Scott or somebody who really knows what they’re looking at, will chime in and explain what is really happening, and when they do that(as they just did over the past page), he privately exhales and relaxes. 
 

It’s easy to poo poo everything as he has been doing lately, then when one thing changes, he can claim he was right all along.  It’s just a silly game he plays all the time here.  He’s a Spin-Dr plain and simple.  
 

it’s just better to ignore 99% of it. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

None of the above.

I’ve been worried about an awful winter and the last few days of modelology admittedly held some promise for at least a chance of a cold enough pattern for a week or so for snow before more Pac puke. I’m just very very worried . I’ve been thinking in back of mind we’d see modeling revert back to the awful look . 

A ridge retrograding from the PNA region into AK wouldn’t return PAC puke to the CONUS. It would actually encourage more of an Arctic plunge....it just increases the chance that a system could cut if the ridge is further west like that. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

A ridge retrograding from the PNA region into AK wouldn’t return PAC puke to the CONUS. It would actually encourage more of an Arctic plunge....it just increases the chance that a system could cut if the ridge is further west like that. 

Yes exactly the concern and reason to worry . I have faith in you guys . Just my own concerns 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

Still good though. I just think as that trough retros west the ridging will too.  Not trying to go poo poo on y’all. 

 You’re definitely correct. It’s starting the fade the Aleutian low as hgts back into Ak. That could be good (see GEFS geps) or its a bit muted like the eps. 
 

Just need to see if it goes further west into the Aleutians which would be standard Niña. This might be a response from the mjo getting into p5/6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

A ridge retrograding from the PNA region into AK wouldn’t return PAC puke to the CONUS. It would actually encourage more of an Arctic plunge....it just increases the chance that a system could cut if the ridge is further west like that. 

A d that is where the Atlantic side could help yes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't forget, there rarely is such thing as a persistent '14-'15 type pattern. Many times, our pattern are sort of in between good and garbage. The reasons why sometimes these break right (like Dec 07 for instance) is because of some subtle, but notable distinctions in where features like troughs and ridges are placed.

So it doesn't do a lot of good when you see something not 100% perfect and get all bent out of shape. I don't see anything wrong as a whole on the EPS, especially by December standards. Looking forward to a change.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy Thanksgiving all. I hope this day helps you guys reflect on kindness, compassion, and just love the neighbor. I do like to come here to talk about the weather, but man.. You guys love to one up eachother on who is this and who is that. Who is passive aggressive, who is not. I started getting sucked into y'alls banter, but no mo3te for me. Just enjoy the day and realize why we need to start respecting one another. Now.. Back to the weather.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Don't forget, there rarely is such thing as a persistent '14-'15 type pattern. Many times, our pattern are sort of in between good and garbage. The reasons why sometimes these break right (like Dec 07 for instance) is because of some subtle, but notable distinctions in where features like troughs and ridges are placed.

So it doesn't do a lot of good when you see something not 100% perfect and get all bent out of shape. I don't see anything wrong as a whole on the EPS, especially by December standards. Looking forward to a change.

I think our best shot is when the pna ridge starts to move west. It will allow colder air into Canada and the southeast ridge will still be a bay, at least at first. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Don't forget, there rarely is such thing as a persistent '14-'15 type pattern. Many times, our pattern are sort of in between good and garbage. The reasons why sometimes these break right (like Dec 07 for instance) is because of some subtle, but notable distinctions in where features like troughs and ridges are placed.

So it doesn't do a lot of good when you see something not 100% perfect and get all bent out of shape. I don't see anything wrong as a whole on the EPS, especially by December standards. Looking forward to a change.

As long as there is no pig, I’m happy with the look. Dec 2008 had a big Aleutian ridge too and -PNA. Both ‘07 and ‘08 did.  

It doesn’t look like the PNA is going to go negative anytime soon though. Maybe just not as ragingly positive. We’ll see if it starts to revert to more typical Nina -PNA toward later December. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

As long as there is no pig, I’m happy with the look. Dec 2008 had a big Aleutian ridge too and -PNA. Both ‘07 and ‘08 did.  

It doesn’t look like the PNA is going to go negative anytime soon though. Maybe just not as ragingly positive. We’ll see if it starts to revert to more typical Nina -PNA toward later December. 

Yeah exactly. Doesn’t have to be a pristine -NAO/+PNA etc. Looking forward to the change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...