Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

January 18-19 SWFE


HoarfrostHubb
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, weatherwiz said:

Avatar should give a clue ;) 

Right and i've seen that of course. But it also makes sense weather wise, weather wiz. 2010-2011 is def OUR year for CT snow. We got 3 major snow storms in Jan alone, a pack that would like VT on a good winter and many many more events, including box day. 2010-2011 was OUR year, just like 2014-2015 was E MA year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Right and i've seen that of course. But it also makes sense weather wise, weather wiz. 2010-2011 is def OUR year for CT snow. We got 3 major snow storms in Jan alone, a pack that would like VT on a good winter and many many more events, including box day. 2010-2011 was OUR year, just like 2014-2015 was E MA year.

It was a crazy year in terms of weather for sure...Also had the June 1 severe weather outbreak :D 

But Boxing Day...dark memory for me...I was in a horrific spot. I was pissed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

It was a crazy year in terms of weather for sure...Also had the June 1 severe weather outbreak :D 

But Boxing Day...dark memory for me...I was in a horrific spot. I was pissed. 

That was a nutty year for wild natural phenomena. Great winter, June 1 severe, record July heat, wet August, Irene, Octobomb etc. And elsewhere there was record tornadoes, April 27 outbreak, Joplin disaster, historic Japan tsunami. Just a wild year all around. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

At this time don't see any need to make adjustments from this. Did receive a comment yesterday that I am probably too cute with southern CT there...which I am. Sometimes I like to be cute though. I always just feel though coastal CT somehow always finds a way to flip in these setups. Could have just moved the 3-6'' line farther south and then have a 1-3'' shading 

356059400_1stcallsnowmap.png.632f5188933ba07f8f61d9c7350d6d69.png

As a SW CT resident for life I would say we almost always get more than SE CT. 2-4 for all of SW CT, maybe 3-5 up toward Reading/Ridgefield etc then confine the Coating - 2 to SE CT. Just my opinion but overall a solid map. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sn0waddict said:

As a SW CT resident for life I would say we almost always get more than SE CT. 2-4 for all of SW CT, maybe 3-5 up toward Reading/Ridgefield etc then confine the Coating - 2 to SE CT. Just my opinion but overall a solid map. 

I factor that thinking into a lot of the maps, this one is no exception. SE CT is the worst spot for this storm, NW CT hills, the best.

01.16.20_snow_forecast_1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kitzbuhel Craver said:

Any room for that?

Yeah sure...if it develops a bit faster, then we'll see a more enhanced CF form and that will focus some lower lift just on the north/northwest side of it which could give some enhanced totals by an inch or two.

Scott mentioned it earlier this morning I think...but somewhere from NE MA down 128/I-95 and then back WSW near the CT shoreline could see a little enhancement if that happens.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

RGEM tickled slightly colder for the southern peeps dealing with some changeover issues. Secondary is a little SE and more defined.

I'm hoping the warming and changeover is timed perfectly with the precip shutting off around here, and it's looking more and more like that's whats going to happen. Hopefully just some dz at the end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Sn0waddict said:

As a SW CT resident for life I would say we almost always get more than SE CT. 2-4 for all of SW CT, maybe 3-5 up toward Reading/Ridgefield etc then confine the Coating - 2 to SE CT. Just my opinion but overall a solid map. 

I am going to make some slight adjustments such as bringing the 3-6'' farther south and just put a 1-3'' along immediate shoreline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Ah, thanks i didnt see that. What a pain in the butt to scroll through all those files though! And the GFS fronto maps dont even work, only NAM is working.

ECMWF total QPF for 6Z.Some at the very end is lost to liquid for southern areas. 80-85% is frozen though. At 3Z the 925 line makes it up to 84

ecmwf-deterministic-massachusetts-t925-9402800.thumb.png.c96eed3af251ed2ef75aafe2c1e248cd.pngecmwf-deterministic-massachusetts-total_precip_inch-9438800.thumb.png.ed70184a980fa854fd7f85f2b6513de9.png

didn't realize the EC had gone that high on qpf.  that would be 6-10 for many in CNE NNE with good ratios.  Seems to be a sign of an incoming slight overperformer as Jeff has suggested.  Maybe we are trending back a bit to what was shown 4-5 days ago.  wouldn't be the first time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...