Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

January 2020 General Discussions & Observations Thread


Rtd208
 Share

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, bluewave said:

NYC already in the top 10 warmest January 1st to 15th periods before the warmest temperatures arrive.

Time Series Summary for NY CITY CENTRAL PARK, NY
Click column heading to sort ascending, click again to sort descending.
Rank
Ending Date
Mean Avg Temperature Jan 1 to Jan 15
Missing Count
1 2007-01-15 46.4 0
2 1932-01-15 44.0 0
3 1950-01-15 43.6 0
4 1907-01-15 43.5 0
5 1998-01-15 43.3 0
6 2005-01-15 42.2 0
7 1937-01-15 42.1 0
8 1930-01-15 41.7 0
9 1890-01-15 41.4 0
10 2020-01-15 41.2 8

hmm so in years 1932 1950 and 1907 when their was no global climate change january 1-15 were warmer..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jfklganyc said:

31F for our “cold” morning

Just killed a mosquito in my kitchen

If that doesnt sum up this winter...I dont know what does

Saw an article that great lakes ice cover trails even last year...LOL.    Stores have stocks of ice melt, snowblowers, sleds that are just sitting there.   On the bright side Jan heating bills will be lower especially those with Nat Gas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, nycwinter said:

hmm so in years 1932 1950 and 1907 when their was no global climate change january 1-15 were warmer..

That 1932 record warmest January still stands for NYC. It’s the only winter month that hasn’t set a new warmest record since 2015.

https://www.weather.gov/media/okx/Climate/CentralPark/warmcoldmonths.pdf

Top 3 warmest winter months in NYC

Dec

50.8...2015

44.1...2001

43.8...1984

Jan

43.2....1932

41.4....1990/1950

40.9....1913/2006

Feb

42.0...2018

41.6...2017

40.9...2012

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a big change on the GE FS rmm plots for the mjo. Takes it through 6 very Amplified almost to phase 7 at the end. Yesterday had the wave dying off in six and looping back towards five. Also if guidance is remotely correct starting next week Thursday we look to more seasonable to below-normal temperatures while the mjo is still in  its warm phases

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, binbisso said:

That's a big change on the GE FS rmm plots for the mjo. Takes it through 6 very Amplified almost to phase 7 at the end. Yesterday had the wave dying off in six and looping back towards five. Also if guidance is remotely correct starting next week Thursday we look to more seasonable to below-normal temperatures while the mjo is still in  its warm phases

We can always get transient cool shots behind cold fronts in phase 6. But root for the GEFS to keep going  to phase 8 by the start of February. 
 

8F397681-1680-41EE-9AE9-8EEA98CF71C2.gif.62cce0e96dc670db6c209f6e30495cad.gif

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bluewave said:

We can always get transient cool shots behind cold fronts in phase 6. But root for the GEFS to keep going  to phase 8 by the start of February. 
 

8F397681-1680-41EE-9AE9-8EEA98CF71C2.gif.62cce0e96dc670db6c209f6e30495cad.gif

 

 

Yeah it will be great to get phase 8 heading into our snowiest month should make February very interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PB-99 said:

 

Ahem.

 

Now you believe me huh 

Believe you? I have been saying that the EPS was probably too weak going into phase 6. So we probably get a 6 looking composite around the 17-24th. That is a transition phase with lingering influences from 5 with the -PNA. If we go phase 7 last week of January, then we get improvements in the EPO and PNA. But the real prize people are hoping for would be getting to 8 first week of February. Would match our recent backloaded winters theme. Hopefully, this works out.

That’s actually one of the EPS biases. It tends to be too weak with MJO 6 after phase 5. Probably another reason that we could see plenty of model volatility after phase 5.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0862.1

80C26980-7BC3-49AE-BE1E-E9623B350616.gif.065238b61d3dc13d219f301b34a5cbe6.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bluewave said:

Believe you? I have been saying that the EPS was probably too weak going into phase 6. So we probably get a 6 looking composite around the 17-24th. That is a transition phase with lingering influences from 5 with the -PNA. If we go phase 7 last week of January, then we get improvements in the EPO and PNA. But the real prize people are hoping for would be getting to 8 first week of February. Would match our recent backloaded winters theme. Hopefully, this works out.

A trip through 7/8/1/2 would be the holy grail-still in lala land though but better trend last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bluewave said:

Believe you? I have been saying that the EPS was probably too weak going into phase 6. So we probably get a 6 looking composite around the 17-24th. That is a transition phase with lingering influences from 5 with the -PNA. If we go phase 7 last week of January, then we get improvements in the EPO and PNA. But the real prize people are hoping for would be getting to 8 first week of February. Would match our recent backloaded winters theme. Hopefully, this works out.

That’s actually one of the EPS biases. It tends to be too weak with MJO 6 after phase 5. Probably another reason that we could see plenty of model volatility after phase 5.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/full/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0862.1

80C26980-7BC3-49AE-BE1E-E9623B350616.gif.065238b61d3dc13d219f301b34a5cbe6.gif

 
  On 1/6/2020 at 11:13 AM, bluewave said:

The risk for late January is that the the forcing gets stuck near phase 6 like the EPS shows. While these post day 10 forecasts can be low skill, the record SST’s west of the date line may support such an outcome. But a later  MJO pulse in February could make it closer to phase 8. We’ll just have to wait and see.

 

Yes you had a strong p 6 but the above stalled it there. 

While I was arguing that we were heading into p7 and away from p6 , I thought this to be your position.
 

My apologies , has this since changed ?  Do you know see us easily getting in p7 and heading on into p8 like I did/ do ? 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again we keyed on the fake loop on the GEFS 

 

1637387836_6C501012-D0DB-427B-9090-295E5F950F61.gif.484fd0b84d580068bab774c2e2f9e3cdJAN7MJO.gif.8501aad131700a89f03546bf6f6e3baa.gif

 

 

We will strongly go into p7 and head into p8 

 

Phase diagram of the MJO index from the operational GFS

One only has to look at the Jan 1 - 15 period when the MJO in p4 reaches an amplitude of 1.5 SD 9x out of 10 the MJO will circle into p8.

And as I pointed out over the last few days in here that is where we are going.

The EPS punts the trough off the WC by day 9 now. We are now inside 10 days, the GEFS is just slower but has finally come around.

So to the " winters dead crowd " and those who were on wait until  Feb 15, I think you can see that this gets back and gets back here before then. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PB-99 said:
 
  On 1/6/2020 at 11:13 AM, bluewave said:

The risk for late January is that the the forcing gets stuck near phase 6 like the EPS shows. While these post day 10 forecasts can be low skill, the record SST’s west of the date line may support such an outcome. But a later  MJO pulse in February could make it closer to phase 8. We’ll just have to wait and see.

 

Yes you had a strong p 6 but the above stalled it there. 

While I was arguing that we were heading into p6 and away from p6 , I thought this to be your position.
 

My apologies , has this since changed ?  Do you know see us easily getting in p7 and heading on into p8 like I did/ do ? 

 

 

 

 

I was talking about the 17-24th period. So it looks like the models are correcting stronger with phase 6 now. We need to get it over to phase 7 January 25-31 so we can work on improving the EPO and PNA. That’s why I mentioned a possible 8 for February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, bluewave said:

I was talking about the 17-24th period. So it looks like the models are correcting stronger with phase 6 now. We need to get it over to phase 7 January 25-31 so we can work on improving the EPO and PNA. That’s why I mentioned a possible 8 for February.

You also have to consider the lagged response, which is why I favor mid Feb for colder weather. 

This assumes the wave keeps progressing and doesn't slow down in 6/7.

If it does slow down then the cold would arrive late Feb and into March, which lines up with our late winter/early spring cold/snow of the past decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, White Gorilla said:

If the MJO doesn't help us out, can we look to the EPO hopefully going negative at some point? 

We can get help from the -EPO as soon as we get closer to phase 7 in late January. Here is what the MJO did the last 2 times we had such an amplified phase 4-5 passage in January. Both times we eventually got over closer to phase 8 in February. 

6B817BC8-5EAC-4FCA-8A39-CD02FF5BB7D5.gif.0c4f77d31b29d4f744956193c3652abd.gif

0C65BD34-BE87-4C99-8B19-6C5B96318991.gif.0e32e9fd0f0611f336864313b27e27fe.gif

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, bluewave said:

I was talking about the 17-24th period. So it looks like the models are correcting stronger with phase 6 now. We need to get it over to phase 7 January 25-31 so we can work on improving the EPO and PNA. That’s why I mentioned a possible 8 for February.

 

Ahh ok I read " late Jan ". Kool , we seem to agree now. 

 

Here is my position once again, we will be heading into 7 and then into p8 as I have been posting in here since last Thursday. At that time the MJO Rimm plots were trying to fade the MJO back around into the COD and the concerns at  that time  ( not you ) was that were going to circle back to into p4/5/6 because of the warm water N of Australia. 

That was easily pegged as garbage and tossed aside. 

 

Now p7 doesn`t bring the trough into the east out body and soul in fact it`s Ttrough is probably just east of the Rockies but I think what people kept missing was that the Neg the EPS was ejecting wasn`t some pig pac poorly sourced negative that once east of the Rockies would just end up down sloping warm PAC air in the east.

Typically they are, that`s why p7 isn`t BN and one would have to wait for the typical p8 response. However and another silly argument by some ( again not you ) was what that there had to be " a lag ", again that was also pointed out as garbage because that piece of the TPV the EPS ejects is real LLC air and that undercuts the ridge starting on d9, you can see that as the 0 line is down in N/C , by day 15 it`s in S/C. 

It is why the EPS was faster weakening the ridge in the means.  So what does this all mean ? You will start to see the a more favorable 500 by day 9 now.

That doesn`t always mean " snow " but surely the suppression of the SE RIDGE, the end to the plus 10 to plus 20 we have experienced during this 30 day period and a N regime at 2 meter. ( late Jan N is all you need ) .

 

 But the upper air pattern gets better and the point being driven home here for a week by me was, winter was not over ,  the SE ridge would get muted and we should return to a more N late Jan pattern by Jan 20.

Which will lead into the core of winter Feb idea. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SnoSki14 said:

You also have to consider the lagged response, which is why I favor mid Feb for colder weather. 

This assumes the wave keeps progressing and doesn't slow down in 6/7.

If it does slow down then the cold would arrive late Feb and into March, which lines up with our late winter/early spring cold/snow of the past decade.

 

Zero lag. 

And the MJO doesn`t slow.

Non of this has any support, it`s complete nonsense. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Snow88 said:

It's great the GEFS  doesnt stall in 6 anymore and now moving into 7. Things should get better by months end.

It's only the freaking 8th, months end is over three weeks away. I'm hoping things get better way before months end.

I'm hoping by the 18th or so. Call me a wild eyed optimist.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a single post about the upcoming pattern in over 3 hours. EPS looks  good starting around day 8 and only getting better. Negative EPO positive PNA showing up later in the Run. I guess if a South East Ridge was going to pop in the long range or the mjo was going into the warm phases they'll be post after post here.every other sub-forum is buzzing with optimism except here. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, binbisso said:

Not a single post about the upcoming pattern in over 3 hours. EPS looks  good starting around day 8 and only getting better. Negative EPO positive PNA showing up later in the Run. I guess if a South East Ridge was going to pop in the long range or the mjo was going into the warm phases they'll be post after post here.every other sub-forum is buzzing with optimism except here. 

Gee maybe people have to work

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...