Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Wednesday 12/11 SNE Snow Threat


The 4 Seasons
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, weatherwiz said:

I'll chime in as well. 

Do you have bufkit, Ray? If not coolwx.com has great tools to see what you could with bufkit.

coolwx.com > Hourly forecast models > then you can choose plot, station, and model on the left hand side.

Here is the 0z 3K NAM for BDL:

1. the -12C to -18C range is illustrated...this is where snow growth is most optimized

2. I highlighted by the purple box where the negative values of omega area (negative values of omega indicate rising motion). Notice how you have very negative values of omega right inside the snowgrowth zone...this is referred to as a "cross hair signature". When this occurs and you have sufficient ice and RH in this layer (what's great about bufkit is you can overly RH with this...I'll post an example) you're not only going to maximize snow growth...but you're going to get very intense precip rates

3. I circled area of dry air in the low-levels around 6z or so...that was my flag for all this

image.png.99dab06b96ad02834871581ce87a9663.png

Now let's look at the RH profile. The time of snow was prior to 12z...well the heaviest anyways. Notice something...very moist...the dry air in the lower levels doesn't take over until around 12z...AFTER the precip has fallen. My mistake here was harping that drier air would be in place earlier...but between 0z-12z...you have a very deep moist profile here (noted by the high RH values through the troposphere

 

image.png.19429a6c7da6fbcc310d2498d462ce0d.png

Thanks, a lot...I'm going to begin incorporating this into my Final Calls, once we are at a very close range. @dendrite thank you, as well.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Thanks, a lot...I'm going to begin incorporating this into my Final Calls, once we are at a very close range. @dendrite thank you, as well.

 

 

I had a longer reply to you at work that I never sent...oops. Paul covered the basics well.

Anyway, COMET offers some good tutorials. Are you registered there?

https://www.meted.ucar.edu/training_course.php?id=6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dendrite said:

I had a longer reply to you at work that I never sent...oops. Paul covered the basics well.

Anyway, COMET offers some good tutorials. Are you registered there?

https://www.meted.ucar.edu/training_course.php?id=6

No. May be worth a look....soundings have always been an egregious hole on my knowledge base and I have never rectified that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

No. May be worth a look....soundings have always been an egregious hole on my knowledge base and I have never rectified that.

This is a good quick winter tutorial too.

https://www.weather.gov/media/zhu/ZHU_Training_Page/winter_stuff/Winter_Stuff/Forecasting_P_Type.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

You don’t have the NE CT hills circled . You have far NE Windham Cty. The NE CT hills are primarily in Tolland County over to Union in extreme NW Windham County .. all out of the circled area . I’ve seen many mets and others make this error over the years 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

You don’t have the NE CT hills circled . You have far NE Windham Cty. The NE CT hills are primarily in Tolland County over to Union in extreme NW Windham County .. all out of the circled area . I’ve seen many mets and others make this error over the years 

It includes Union, which is in the hills.

I know where Tolland is on the map..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Event next week could finish raindance....KO for KU....

My stuff works better seasonally then for months for snow. Look at Boston last year:

                 Actual      Analog Blend (1953-54, 1976-77, 1986-87, 1994-95 x2, 2006-07)

Nov           0.1"                   (0.0+1.0+3.5+0.1+0.1+0.0)/6 = 0.8"

Dec           0.1"                   (0.0+17.2+3.4+1.5+1.5+0.8)/6 = 4.1"

Jan           2.1"                   (19.2+23.2+24.3+4.4+4.4+1.0)/6 = 12.8"

Feb           11.6"                 (1.9+5.9+3.7+8.5+8.5+4.6)/6 = 5.5" 

Mar           13.5"                 (0.4+10.7+3.5+0.4+0.4+10.2)/6 = 4.3"

Apr            0.0"                   (2.1+0.0+4.1+0.0+0.0+0.5) / 6 = 1.2"

N-A           27.4"                  (0.8+4.1+12.8+5.5+4.3+1.2) = 28.7"

At any given moment before the final total, it was out by 10" or so at some points. The math will snap toward the analog blend if the blend is right idea.  This is what I had for Boston, in the raw blend - for 2019-20. Idea in the analogs was a lot of NE cities start strong then fade a lot late.

Year             Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Season
1953-1954 0 0 0 19.2 1.9 0.4 2.1 0 23.6
1953-1954 0 0 0 19.2 1.9 0.4 2.1 0 23.6
1983-1984 0 0 2.6 21.1 0.3 19 0 0 43
1983-1984 0 0 2.6 21.1 0.3 19 0 0 43
1992-1993 0 0.6 9.7 12.9 19.6 38.9 2.2 0 83.9
1995-1996 0 4.1 24.1 39.8 15.5 16.8 7.3 0 107.6
2009-2010 0.1 0 15.2 13.2 7 0.2 0 0 35.7
2009-2010 0.1 0 15.2 13.2 7 0.2 0 0 35.7
2009-2010 0.1 0 15.2 13.2 7 0.2 0 0 35.7
2018-2019 0 0.1 0.1 2.1 11.6 13.5 T 0 27.4
Blend 0.0 0.5 8.5 17.5 7.2 10.9 1.5 0.0 45.9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raindancewx said:

My stuff works better seasonally then for months for snow. Look at Boston last year:

                 Actual      Analog Blend (1953-54, 1976-77, 1986-87, 1994-95 x2, 2006-07)

Nov           0.1"                   (0.0+1.0+3.5+0.1+0.1+0.0)/6 = 0.8"

Dec           0.1"                   (0.0+17.2+3.4+1.5+1.5+0.8)/6 = 4.1"

Jan           2.1"                   (19.2+23.2+24.3+4.4+4.4+1.0)/6 = 12.8"

Feb           11.6"                 (1.9+5.9+3.7+8.5+8.5+4.6)/6 = 5.5" 

Mar           13.5"                 (0.4+10.7+3.5+0.4+0.4+10.2)/6 = 4.3"

Apr            0.0"                   (2.1+0.0+4.1+0.0+0.0+0.5) / 6 = 1.2"

N-A           27.4"                  (0.8+4.1+12.8+5.5+4.3+1.2) = 28.7"

At any given moment before the final total, it was out by 10" or so at some points. The math will snap toward the analog blend if the blend is right idea.  This is what I had for Boston, in the raw blend - for 2019-20. Idea in the analogs was a lot of NE cities start strong then fade a lot late.

Year             Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Season
1953-1954 0 0 0 19.2 1.9 0.4 2.1 0 23.6
1953-1954 0 0 0 19.2 1.9 0.4 2.1 0 23.6
1983-1984 0 0 2.6 21.1 0.3 19 0 0 43
1983-1984 0 0 2.6 21.1 0.3 19 0 0 43
1992-1993 0 0.6 9.7 12.9 19.6 38.9 2.2 0 83.9
1995-1996 0 4.1 24.1 39.8 15.5 16.8 7.3 0 107.6
2009-2010 0.1 0 15.2 13.2 7 0.2 0 0 35.7
2009-2010 0.1 0 15.2 13.2 7 0.2 0 0 35.7
2009-2010 0.1 0 15.2 13.2 7 0.2 0 0 35.7
2018-2019 0 0.1 0.1 2.1 11.6 13.5 T 0 27.4
Blend 0.0 0.5 8.5 17.5 7.2 10.9 1.5 0.0 45.9

I was breaking balls for the most part. I agree its going to quiet down in January, but the key wwillbe whether or not second half blocking developes. I think that it will, but if not, it may be a short winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ginx snewx said:

South side hills here melted pretty good. Was pretty cool driving on southbound 395 with caked trees and woods with the northbound side pretty void of cake.

i noticed the same thing yesterday on a north-south highway. trees on the west side of the highway were caked, trees on the east side, and the ground beneath them, was all bare. sun doing some work, even with the Dec sun angle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Here is why Dec snow crushes Morch snow. It’s festive, it doesn’t melt in the sun and it gives a special feeling. You don’t worry about losing it until the next rainer whereas Morch it’s already gone 

1000% agree. Everyone who loves snow loves Dec snow. I know some people, who actually hate snow, but love it anytime before Dec 25. Is there anyone who is actually prefers March snow over December? I mean ill take snow anytime i can get it but Id much rather have 30" in December than March, hell id rather have 20" in Dec than 30" in Mar. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dendrite said:

Sunsets already getting later. 

That's interesting, so sunrises are getting earlier.

According to google Sunset here is 4:22 for today, 13, 14 4:23 for 15,16,17 and 4:24 for 18,19,20. So it's increasing at about 20 seconds per day or 1/3min per day. According to Google our earliest sunset at this lat/long is 4:22PM

Do you know why that is exactly? (Why sunsets are later but the days are still getting shorter?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The 4 Seasons said:

1000% agree. Everyone who loves snow loves Dec snow. I know some people, who actually hate snow, but love it anytime before Dec 25. Is there anyone who is actually prefers March snow over December? I mean ill take snow anytime i can get it but Id much rather have 30" in December than March, hell id rather have 20" in Dec than 30" in Mar. 

Since I like snow in any part of snow season, I'd take the 30" March.  Another reason is that, even though December averages 12% more snow than March (19.6" to 17.6"), March has recorded 9 storms of a foot or more compared to 4 such events in December.  A third is average snow depth.  Over 21 winters Dec. 1 has averaged 1" (only 5 had 1"+) and increases to 9" by the 31st.  March begins with 21" on average and still has 13" on 3/31.  To each their own.  ;)
 

Do you know why that is exactly? (Why sunsets are later but the days are still getting shorter?)

Years ago I read a fairly detailed reason for this, and came away confused.  Not sure whether that was due to a poor explanation or my lousy comprehension.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, tamarack said:

Since I like snow in any part of snow season, I'd take the 30" March.  Another reason is that, even though December averages 12% more snow than March (19.6" to 17.6"), March has recorded 9 storms of a foot or more compared to 4 such events in December.  A third is average snow depth.  Over 21 winters Dec. 1 has averaged 1" (only 5 had 1"+) and increases to 9" by the 31st.  March begins with 21" on average and still has 13" on 3/31.  To each their own.  ;)
 

Do you know why that is exactly? (Why sunsets are later but the days are still getting shorter?)

Years ago I read a fairly detailed reason for this, and came away confused.  Not sure whether that was due to a poor explanation or my lousy comprehension.

sunrises are still happening later..and a longer day-to-day rate than what we're increasing sunsets with daily. 

(hope that made sense)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...