Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

November 2019 discussion


weathafella
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

White T-Giving’s for all!

Lol, we'd probably lose all of our snowpack by 11/20 even if we got hit by both storms. Too early to maintain it at our latitude...esp with the pattern looking like it may relax a little. 

But i hope we get another event right before Tday

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Lol, we'd probably lose all of our snowpack by 11/20 even if we got hit by both storms. Too early to maintain it at our latitude...esp with the pattern looking like it may relax a little. 

But i hope we get another event right before Tday

Ya I thought the same thing..way to early to maintain anything here in SNE.  And T Day is late this year to boot..so it won’t be white from anything  being modeled currently imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoth said:

Funny how BDR's entire positive departure in '13 was attributable to one historic event. But that's often how it goes in the coastal plain.

I am 18 miles almost due north from Bridgeport and I pulled off 35ish inches last year....amazing how much of a difference such a short distance makes around here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Spanks45 said:

I am 18 miles almost due north from Bridgeport and I pulled off 35ish inches last year....amazing how much of a difference such a short distance makes around here!

Oh for sure. That few hundred feet of extra elevation/distance from the Sound often works to your advantage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Spanks45 said:

I am 18 miles almost due north from Bridgeport and I pulled off 35ish inches last year....amazing how much of a difference such a short distance makes around here!

That November storm was the post-Sandy snowstorm which was particularly bad because thousands still had no power in my area at the time (NJ). Remember thinking how awesome this winter was going to be until just missing out on the really big totals the Feb 13' epicness delivered that propelled BDR. "Only got 12" lol.

Also, BOS the only one with more positives than negatives although most of those positive departures are under double digits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Sugarloaf1989 said:

Farmington, ME looked like that in 1998. 3-5" of ice, three days of freezing rain.

Farmington actually had considerable IP in that event, and though there was considerable damage there, it was much less than places 15-60 miles to the south.  We moved in May 1998 to our current location in the town just east of Farmington, and our 63 forest acres had less cumulative damage than did our 0.8 acre houselot in Gardiner, where it was all ZR.  While scoping out the future Kennebec Highlands acquisition by the state, we encountered a huge difference in damage a bit south of Watson Pond in Rome.  The change was from significant loss of sizable branches (north) to "asparagus trees" to the south - naked trunks surrounded by piles of limbs 6' deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hoth said:

I heard rumors of a SSW event towards the end of the month. Anyone got eyes out that far? Probably just voodoo at this range anyway.

Looks like a pretty big heat flux is set to occur towards the end of the GFS run but positioned over Europe. 

This site is incredible...only problem is I don't understand how to interpret many of these tools lol. I think the increasing heat flux corresponds to sudden rises in temp 

gfs_nh-ehf-hgt_lonprs-xsect_20191103_f372.png

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The signal at mid month is legit. 

The Euro run itself obviously is not - not yet anyway.   But, the fact that there is something situated out there in that particular spacial-temporal range is what's paramount there, and could very well be the initial distantly distorted vision in models.

A few individual GFS members are enhancing the N flow/loading into mid latitudes along with a deep nadir in the heights nearing mid month, but from this range that can mean everything from a dry albeit deep cold wave ...to perhaps including a pattern entry event.  

The concepts/previous discussion are still in play.

Overnight AO  wow!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

The SPV does look to become weakened and sort of elongated moving towards mid-month. Not surprised really with these crazy strong Rossby Waves which have been occurring. 

On the EPS it does elongate at 50mb, but overall is rather cold too. IOW, it's stable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ginx snewx said:

Ralph is the best at charts

IMG_20191104_070603.jpg

This is cool stuff!  My gut tells me the notion that November snow spoils the winter is a myth.  But I think there may be something to the idea that the relaxations which follow wintry November's tend to cut into peak climate time as the pattern reloads.  Maybe it'd be better to see it broken down by "date of next warning-level event following November snowfall?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Hoth said:

I heard rumors of a SSW event towards the end of the month. Anyone got eyes out that far? Probably just voodoo at this range anyway.

If there is one, keep in mind that there is a coherent time-lag in the statistical correlation.  Any subsequent forcing on the Arctic Oscillation lags by as much as 20 to 30 days. 

Few know this, or, demonstrate very readily via turns of phrase and deliveries of prose where they've beautifully ( otherwise ) fused the sudden stratospheric warming sciences into their speculative, and I'm like " ...you do realize the effects of SSW are outside your forecast range, right?." 

There is a particularity that needs to be observed, else ... whatever is being observed is more likely to fail coherent forcing on the AO outside of coincident index numerology. 

The warm plume has to propagate downward in time ( i.e., 'downwelling' ).  In every case of SSW graphical layout back to 1979, this downward motion appears to 'spiral' away from a central axial point that begins near the axis of PV rotation, at a very high beginning SIGMA level - typically between 5 and 30 hPa.  As it descends, it will first appear to weaken, before the next node comes in warmer, then fades slightly ... then warmer, each node gaining x-coordinate distance upon each emergence.  That growth in the x-coordinate is a representation of gaining distance from the axis of rotation.  

image.png.64992aaf71546882463503fe2e3f4eb0.png

Notice the ending node is almost faded/indistinquishable in anomaly relative to the surrounding features of the ambient field ( nearing 150 hPa SIGMA) there bottom right along the nodal curve.   That is tropopausal mechanical absorption/ increasing stabilization and suppression of the depths ensues, and that weakens the PV ... "pancaking" and blocking in the mid and upper troposphere ignites.  This entire translation of events, as you can see took ~ from Jan 15th to the end of February ... and we can see in this case a very clear and coherent AO correlation taking place:   

2013 -0.610 -1.007 -3.185  0.322  0.494  0.549 -0.011  0.154 -0.461  0.263  2.029  1.475    ... Bold is March. 

SSW don't really value-add like the popular mantra of the day has it in their mind(s) and bandy about.  If one did take place in the last week of this month... We may be hearing about an AO response some time after Christmas.. which is fine.  But, I also offer that this particular year we may not have much trouble with AO being negative, so it could be lost in the din of a -AO complexion hemisphere anyway.   

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Eduardo said:

This is cool stuff!  My gut tells me the notion that November snow spoils the winter is a myth.  But I think there may be something to the idea that the relaxations which follow wintry November's tend to cut into peak climate time as the pattern reloads.  Maybe it'd be better to see it broken down by "date of next warning-level event following November snowfall?"

Not huge sample size but long periods of record, and 3 of 4 sites averaged AN (slightly) for those winters.  To the nearest inch, BOS avg was +2", BDR +3", NYC -4", PHL +1".  Average across all 4 is within 1" of average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Three consecutive days with a freeze here. Not bad.

it's a tedious nerdiness but I'm always curious when that first pond edge ice forms ...None as of this morning leaving town at dawn, but that was our third morning 25 to 28 F, so despite climbing to the upper 40s or lower 50s by day, with the low sun angles and the longer nights ... I could see us start rimming the ponds soon. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

If there is one, keep in mind that there is a coherent time-lag in the statistical correlation.  Any subsequent forcing on the Arctic Oscillation lags by as much as 20 to 30 days. 

Few know this, or, demonstrate very readily via turns of phrase and deliveries of prose where they've beautifully ( otherwise ) fused the sudden stratospheric warming sciences into their speculative, and I'm like " ...you do realize the effects of SSW are outside your forecast range, right?." 

There is a particularity that needs to be observed, else ... whatever is being observed is more likely to fail coherent forcing on the AO outside of coincident index numerology. 

The warm plume has to propagate downward in time ( i.e., 'downwelling' ).  In every case of SSW graphical layout back to 1979, this downward motion appears to 'spiral' away from a central axial point that begins near the axis of PV rotation, at a very high beginning SIGMA level - typically between 5 and 30 hPa.  As it descends, it will first appear to weaken, before the next node comes in warmer, then fades slightly ... then warmer, each node gaining x-coordinate distance upon each emergence.  That growth in the x-coordinate is a representation of gaining distance from the axis of rotation.  

image.png.64992aaf71546882463503fe2e3f4eb0.png

Notice the ending node is almost faded/indistinquishable in anomaly relative to the surrounding features of the ambient field ( nearing 150 hPa SIGMA) there bottom right along the nodal curve.   That is tropopausal mechanical absorption/ increasing stabilization and suppression of the depths ensues, and that weakens the PV ... "pancaking" and blocking in the mid and upper troposphere ignites.  This entire translation of events, as you can see took ~ from Jan 15th to the end of February ... and we can see in this case a very clear and coherent AO correlation taking place:   


2013 -0.610 -1.007 -3.185  0.322  0.494  0.549 -0.011  0.154 -0.461  0.263  2.029  1.475    ... Bold is March. 

SSW don't really value-add like the popular mantra of the day has it in their mind(s) and bandy about.  If one did take place in the last week of this month... We may be hearing about an AO response some time after Christmas.. which is fine.  But, I also offer that this particular year we may not have much trouble with AO being negative anyway, so it could be lost in the din of a -AO complexion hemisphere anyway.   

This is great! Excellent information 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tamarack said:

Farmington actually had considerable IP in that event, and though there was considerable damage there, it was much less than places 15-60 miles to the south.  We moved in May 1998 to our current location in the town just east of Farmington, and our 63 forest acres had less cumulative damage than did our 0.8 acre houselot in Gardiner, where it was all ZR.  While scoping out the future Kennebec Highlands acquisition by the state, we encountered a huge difference in damage a bit south of Watson Pond in Rome.  The change was from significant loss of sizable branches (north) to "asparagus trees" to the south - naked trunks surrounded by piles of limbs 6' deep.

Farmington was were we saw the start of the destruction from the ice storm. It was much worse further South in Jay, Livermore and Turner. Many closed roads and detour's.

Sugarloaf and Kingfield areas were alot more IP than freezing rain. Sugarloaf remains the largest amount of IP I've ever seen, 6".

I might also add this was the coldest freezing rain I've seen. Temperatures at our condo were between 17-25F according to the thermometer at our condo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...