Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Mid October 2019 Bombogensis Coastal


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jbenedet said:

It seems that this shouldn’t remain a mystery for long. The mesolow—if it develops—is currently developing off the Carolina coast. That much is consistent across the guidance which has it. We watch.

There's definitely a surface reflection near CHS as of 12Z, but convection is displaced off to its SE. Broad pressure falls across the Carolinas and southern VA. 

12Z_sfc.thumb.png.7ff9a110ca800e2830e49635bf6987a7.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As was advertised, discussed at length ...all week, limited surface to 800 mb thickness gradients ( laterally ) through New England and nearby coastal waters ( i.e., weak surface frontal structures ) means any surface low will quickly move toward a collocation with the better Q-G forcing at mid levels. There's a lack of antecedent cold air in place.

That's why we are seeing these more recent models runs hint more toward gobbling up the secondary low they ( particularly the Euro) develop between PHL and NYC, and then more cohesively focusing a track through CT. This then goes on to a nadir somewhere between there and coastal Maine or thereabouts, end 24 hours, at which point this is already filling... There may be smaller gyres extending SE of that overall structural migration, and I feel reasonably confident that some of these guidance types have been hyper focused on those satellite features - probably based in no small part on the foresaid homogenized lower thickness layout out.. The next physics in the basket defaults to convection based upon those model's specific "Klein and Frisk" sequencing or whatever in the hell it's called that makes them bad for extratropical management...  

Anyway, this synoptic evolution is not without impacts. The extent is up for grabs. There's a lot of mid level dynamics with this thing as we're all aware...and when we start fiddling with those scenarios ... strange things happen sometimes. I could see a couple of bands of thunderstorms east of the low, arcing up from eastern CT/across much of Mass with an ESE wind underneath and someone over SE Mass getting an EOF spinner out of this... It's not likely, no..but there are possibilities in the fray of this thing that are > than we may think.  Also, if a LLJ/inflow core gets into the 925 mb level, neutral buoyancy or even somewhat unstable SST to air along the shore might transfer some of that down - but that's less having to do with surface pg..

For me in particular, I still suggest that the strongest wind impact may be felt in the back side across much of the region. I don't believe based on recent Euro trends ( a very dependable guidance source inside of 3 day leads ) that a stinger is likely to occur, but.. in the spirit of fairness, the low appears to go through some particular mid level VV saturation somewhere between HFD to PWM; folding could be problem S of the Pike for time... But, without that .. this event's back side has very good momentum transfer in CAA kinematics.

The other thing about this that isn't necessarily very easy to see, is that model consensus overall has pressure falling "AS" the low moves in.   It seems the d(pressure) is taking place at a similar rapidity to the motion of the storm itself. That's an offset where storms motion compensating the restoring forcing, so the wind response may end up less on the front side than the individual pressure contoured charts would readily suggest. This may be less so on the coast, and more pronounced inland. I've seen this hundreds of times.  Squeezed contours with fast cloud motion and trees are barely moving insland, while there's power outages in Plymouth. But, ...then the low moves past, and all the deep pressure tries to fill from two overlapping sources:  Low moving away = delta(pressure rise) and the isollabric vector looks impressive in this to me; cold mid levels coming into the underbelly of this with temps in the 40s and 50s is an unstably lapse rate scenario.  For all this, I would not be surprised if the strongest winds are not on the front side.

Creek flooder too -

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

As was advertised, discussed at length ...all week, limited surface to 800 mb thickness gradients ( laterally ) through New England and nearby coastal waters ( i.e., weak surface frontal structures ) means any surface low will quickly move toward a collocation with the better Q-G forcing at mid levels. There's a lack of antecedent cold air in place.

That's why we are seeing these more recent models runs hint more toward gobbling up the secondary low they ( particularly the Euro) develop between PHL and NYC, and then more cohesively focusing a track through CT. This then goes on to a nadir somewhere between there and coastal Maine or thereabouts, end 24 hours, at which point this is already filling... There may be smaller gyres extending SE of that overall structural migration, and I feel reasonably confident that some of these guidance types have been hyper focused on those satellite features - probably based in no small part on the foresaid homogenized lower thickness layout out.. The next physics in the basket defaults to convection based upon those model's specific "Klein and Frisk" sequencing or whatever in the hell it's called that makes them bad for extratropical management...  

Anyway, this synoptic evolution is not without impacts. The extent is up for grabs. There's a lot of mid level dynamics with this thing as we're all aware...and when we start fiddling with those scenarios ... strange things happen sometimes. I could see a couple of bands of thunderstorms east of the low, arcing up from eastern CT/across much of Mass with an ESE wind underneath and someone over SE Mass getting an EOF spinner out of this... It's not likely, no..but there are possibilities in the fray of this thing that are > than we may think.  Also, if a LLJ/inflow core gets into the 925 mb level, neutral buoyancy or even somewhat unstable SST to air along the shore might transfer some of that down - but that's less having to do with surface pg..

For me in particular, I still suggest that the strongest wind impact may be felt in the back side across much of the region. I don't believe based on recent Euro trends ( a very dependable guidance source inside of 3 day leads ) that a stinger is likely to occur, but.. in the spirit of fairness, the low appears to go through some particular mid level VV saturation somewhere between HFD to PWM; folding could be problem S of the Pike for time... But, without that .. this event's back side has very good momentum transfer in CAA kinematics.

The other thing about this that isn't necessarily very easy to see, is that model consensus overall has pressure falling "AS" the low moves in.   It seems the d(pressure) is taking place at a similar rapidity to the motion of the storm itself. That's an offset where storms motion compensating the restoring forcing, so the wind response may end up less on the front side than the individual pressure contoured charts would readily suggest. This may be less so on the coast, and more pronounced inland. I've seen this hundreds of times.  Squeezed contours with fast cloud motion and trees are barely moving insland, while there's power outages in Plymouth. But, ...then the low moves past, and all the deep pressure tries to fill from two overlapping sources:  Low moving away = delta(pressure rise) and the isollabric vector looks impressive in this to me; cold mid levels coming into the underbelly of this with temps in the 40s and 50s is an unstably lapse rate scenario.  For all this, I would not be surprised if the strongest winds are not on the front side.

Creek flooder too -

I continue to agree with this. That has been my thinking as well. 

The potential is certainly there for some pretty impressive wind gusts tonight, however, I don't think it will be very widespread and we're really relaying on exceptionally difficult-to-pin-down details (mesolows, gravity waves, etc.) to generate wind gusts of those magnitudes. 

You're last paragraph explains it very well too...with how it's deepening and where the deepening is occurring it's just not good for region wide winds on the front side...moreso the backside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, purduewx80 said:

There's definitely a surface reflection near CHS as of 12Z, but convection is displaced off to its SE. Broad pressure falls across the Carolinas and southern VA. 

12Z_sfc.thumb.png.7ff9a110ca800e2830e49635bf6987a7.png

Think the specific area to watch is the blob of convection south of Wilmington NC. Difficult to tell by radar but appears there may already be a very weak LLC embedded within that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

Think the specific area to watch is the blob of convection south of Wilmington NC. Difficult to tell by radar but appears there may already be a very weak LLC embedded within that.

meh, there's a good 850 jet focus there and an MCV over GA supporting it, but it's pretty clear the sfc low will develop much farther north

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cyclone-68 said:

Could we be looking at some thunder from this Wiz?

I know Tip explained some thoughts on this...I think he was more curious/impressed with the potential than I was. 

If it happens I think it would be extreme southeastern areas. The 12z HRRR is rolling in now and I've been kinda watching sfc theta-e advection and the higher values look to scrape the Cape so I think that's what you want to watch for. Obviously, if there is any convection potential increases significantly for 60-70 mph gusts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, purduewx80 said:

meh, there's a good 850 jet focus there and an MCV over GA supporting it, but it's pretty clear the sfc low will develop much farther north

Which surface low? Heh.

The synoptically driven one that develops near the Delaware bay? Sure.

But even the 6z GFS is developing a meso low/weak TC that traverses the Carolina coast. Maybe it doesn’t happen, but that’s the other area to watch for surface pressure falls, especially judging by the convection collocated there right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...