Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

Severe storms 3-9/12


Recommended Posts

GFS is showing some higher EHI and other parameters in eastern Texas and Louisiana, 18z Saturday to 00z Sunday. If you check the Euro forecast reflectivity maps, it shows some heavy storms in Arkansas in this time period. Both models have <995mb in Kansas on Saturday. So these models are not too different, considering 120 hrs in the future.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CIPS has an interesting analog list for the outbreak. 

DATE 300HGHT 500HGHT 850HGHT 850SPED PMSL THICK 850TMP 2mTMP PWTR 925MIXR 2mDWP F120 F132 F144 FINAL
20120123/0000 ENSO tag 0.842 0.798 0.751 0.880 0.755 0.780 0.729 0.853 0.932 0.936 0.855 11.074 12.279 11.514 11.622
19840218/1800 ENSO tag 0.912 0.918 0.807 0.859 0.787 0.718 0.626 0.807 0.933 0.873 0.887 10.362 12.240 12.101 11.568
20010225/0000 ENSO tag 0.740 0.788 0.860 0.888 0.841 0.876 0.756 0.850 0.942 0.914 0.893 12.276 12.738 9.237 11.417
19920218/0000 ENSO tag 0.863 0.874 0.793 0.884 0.796 0.689 0.733 0.840 0.892 0.929 0.912 8.962 12.456 12.326 11.248
19920215/0000 ENSO tag 0.769 0.745 0.810 0.900 0.695 0.616 0.506 0.759 0.861 0.784 0.627 11.960 10.979 10.524 11.154
20070301/0600 ENSO tag 0.800 0.782 0.770 0.841 0.647 0.826 0.609 0.825 0.855 0.736 0.733 10.684 11.312 11.203 11.066
19820403/0000 ENSO tag 0.764 0.778 0.690 0.851 0.755 0.680 0.788 0.663 0.889 0.867 0.826 10.639 11.585 10.907 11.044
20130210/1800 ENSO tag 0.719 0.708 0.785 0.860 0.798 0.702 0.614 0.742 0.895 0.932 0.818 12.112 11.690 9.194 10.999
20070225/0000 ENSO tag 0.866 0.831 0.689 0.874 0.773 0.739 0.720 0.875 0.906 0.873 0.761 9.104 11.880 12.004 10.996
20090405/0000 ENSO tag 0.851 0.847 0.618 0.794 0.615 0.516 0.731 0.787 0.864 0.828 0.847 11.598 11.093 10.293 10.995
19860318/1800 ENSO tag 0.543 0.612 0.791 0.836 0.788 0.758 0.538 0.683 0.917 0.880 0.811 10.248 11.155 11.549 10.984
20060129/0000 ENSO tag 0.713 0.707 0.790 0.837 0.852 0.693 0.799 0.820 0.930 0.868 0.838 10.544 12.094 10.243 10.960
20020219/1800 ENSO tag 0.710 0.716 0.708 0.763 0.717 0.806 0.592 0.702 0.849 0.832 0.815 11.357 11.050 10.254 10.887
20080411/0000 ENSO tag 0.835 0.895 0.898 0.872 0.895 0.679 0.838 0.788 0.935 0.889 0.802 8.264 12.851 11.290 10.802
19820122/1800 ENSO tag 0.636 0.675 0.708 0.863 0.773 0.863 0.632 0.823 0.810 0.698 0.526 11.846 10.754 9.800 10.800
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS and the GFS-FV3 seems to bring a front with storms through the DFW area early-to-mid morning, whereas the Euro seems to be slowing that front down a bit (bringing it through DFW around noon).  For my location, it would be interesting to see if the other models trend to slowing down the front as the event draws closer.  Still a few days out so we'll have to see, but currently it sounds like this would be more of a concern for east Texas than for DFW.

EDIT: though not for this timeframe, it is also interesting to see the GFS and Euro show another storm system next Tuesday as well.  I'm wondering if we are about to move into a pattern that is much more conducive for severe thunderstorms (and not just because of the change in seasons).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SPC has thrown up a large Day 5 15% risk area for Saturday, March 9th.

l4h0Shi.gif

Quote

Day 5, a surface cold front is progged to sweep across the central
   and southern Plains and into Missouri/Arkansas through the day, and
   then quickly eastward across the Mississippi River into the Ohio and
   Tennessee Valleys overnight.  While the strongest large-scale ascent
   is progged at this time to sweep across the Ozarks vicinity during
   the day, as the trough takes on a negative tilt, substantial
   questions remain as to the degree of moistening/destabilization that
   will be able to occur this far north.  Greater severe risk may
   therefore remain farther south, from east Texas/Louisiana across the
   Lower Mississippi Valley region, and possibly into the central Gulf
   Coast states late.

   Aside from questions regarding instability, this appears likely to
   be a strongly dynamic system with strong flow/shear covering a broad
   area.  As such, damaging winds, and potential for tornadoes, is
   evident at this time.  At this time, a large 15% probability area
   will be issued centered on a north-south zone from Missouri to the
   Lower Mississippi Valley, with additional areal, and risk-level,
   refinements to be made in subsequent outlooks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally when we get snow here (Albuquerque) in Spring down to the valley floor in Mar-May - keep in mind our highs are 57F (3/1) to 85F (5/31) in Spring - I find the Plains or South do tend to get pretty nasty outbreaks. We had about an inch of snow in town on 4/29/2017 for instance (during the day no less, amazing cold with that system). The European system shown on 3/12 is probably powerful enough to bring snow down to the valleys almost to El Paso if it verified as shown.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. This is looking increasingly like a long-duration supercell event across the states of Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Tennessee. Very well put together system we are dealing with here, with rapid destabilization ahead of the front likely. Storms will be able to keep pace, too. 

 

These are some of the largest non-contaminated hodographs I’ve seen for quite some time. I’ll also note the instability progged by all models is looking like an underforecast, at least for southern areas. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AfewUniversesBelowNormal said:

00z Euro.. it may now be trending toward a wind/squall line threat vs primarily tornado outbreak. Time to trend of course, it's taking on the El Nino seasonal characteristic. 

o.gif

oo.gif

That's for the 3/12 system based on the timestamps that I see.  I had thought that one had looked a bit more like a squall line based on the GFS models I had been looking at anyways.  What do you think of the 3/9 system?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BrandonC_TX said:

That's for the 3/12 system based on the timestamps that I see.  I had thought that one had looked a bit more like a squall line based on the GFS models I had been looking at anyways.  What do you think of the 3/9 system?

It seems the first one stole a lot of the potential energy, both are real threats. I'll make the threat title March 9-12. 12z Euro looks good. 

Edit: look at this trend on the 12z Euro now of the SW trough. 

f120-2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro has been showing pretty huge moisture for the storm on 3/12. These figures are consistent with a pretty powerful storm, and they'd certainly end our 2008-2018 streak of dry Marches. In fact, I think this is the most precipitation I've ever seen depicted for a March storm in New Mexico - 90% of it is for Monday morning to Tuesday evening. I'd have to look, but you have to think if Eastern NM is getting that much rain/snow, there is substantial Gulf moisture coming up.

D1BVy9bV4AAitig.jpg:large

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Day 3 still slight risk.

Somewhat surprised given the moisture content and returns on the hodographs.  I guess Day3 MDTs are pretty rare, but this seems to be a good synoptic setup.

Am betting on a Day2 MDT.  Anyone think this could go HGH day of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Day 3 still slight risk.

Somewhat surprised given the moisture content and returns on the hodographs.  I guess Day3 MDTs are pretty rare, but this seems to be a good synoptic setup.

Am betting on a Day2 MDT.  Anyone think this could go HGH day of?
Doubt it because it's a relatively small area with high CAPE, and there are some VBV issues apparent in soundings. Still verbatim the potential for an isolated nasty event like last Sunday's EF4 is apparent should a storm find a sweet spot.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me for looking out a little bit, but verbatim, next Tuesday on the 12Z GFS is probably a few degrees at the surface short of a tornado outbreak for somewhere within the northeastern quarter of Texas. The only thing a little lackluster is the instability, particularly in the low levels. This is the first time the GFS has shown something this volatile so it could just as easily disappear again, but the ECMWF had on and off been showing similar wind fields with the system. It certainly caught my eye, to say the least.

Y0dIHdY.png

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CheeselandSkies said:

Doubt it because it's a relatively small area with high CAPE, and there are some VBV issues apparent in soundings. Still verbatim the potential for an isolated nasty event like last Sunday's EF4 is apparent should a storm find a sweet spot.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

Thanks.  Could you link/attach some of the new soundings?  I haven't seen the veer back, but I haven't really had the time to take a look at them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, 1900hurricane said:

Forgive me for looking out a little bit, but verbatim, next Tuesday on the 12Z GFS is probably a few degrees at the surface short of a tornado outbreak for somewhere within the northeastern quarter of Texas. The only thing a little lackluster is the instability, particularly in the low levels. This is the first time the GFS has shown something this volatile so it could just as easily disappear again, but the ECMWF had on and off been showing similar wind fields with the system. It certainly caught my eye, to say the least.

Y0dIHdY.png

 

Was just about to post this sounding from KSAT (San Antonio)

242528995_2019030712_GFS_132_29_41-98_39_severe_ml.thumb.png.be3d115a0021e498bb8437bdf4cd1e6c.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, CryHavoc said:

Thanks.  Could you link/attach some of the new soundings?  I haven't seen the veer back, but I haven't really had the time to take a look at them.

Here's one from the 12Z NAM valid for 21Z Saturday from the zone of greatest progged 0-1KM EHI along the MS river/AR-TN border region. Looking at the wind barbs the veer-back isn't as pronounced as earlier runs, but there's a very slight amount of backing from 850 up to 700mb, but moreover the winds look pretty unidirectional albeit very strong at all levels. Even so, there are ample amounts of SRH and EHI depicted.

The wind profile is depicted as much more classic (southerly surface winds, veering to SW at 850mb and WSW at 500mb) farther east near the MS/AL border, but instability is progged much weaker there.

nam_2019030712_057_35.57--90.05.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of today's 12Z model cycle, the GFS and ECMWF are actually pretty similar for next week's storm system. The ECMWF is a tad slower and deeper with the trough wrt the GFS, but that's a fairly normal bias between the two. I bet the SPC gives Tuesday a risk area in the next 4-8 day outlook.

https://twitter.com/1900hurricane/status/1103749722609717248

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...