Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,508
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    joxey
    Newest Member
    joxey
    Joined

March Disco


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said:

Any recollection as to what you got in April 1987?

Between 6 and 7", at 270' in Gardiner.  Started with a couple hours of non-accumulating SN- during the afternoon.  Just checked Farmington, and they recorded 7" - I think the heaviest bands stayed to our south.  We actually got more (8") a year later on April 16, with most coming in a 5-6 hour period.  The real excitement that year came earlier, beginning with January's 5 storms bringing 49", the first one going from nothing to 1/8 mile visibility in less than one minute.  Other than in Fort Kent snow squalls, I've never seen such a wall of snow.  Second was the Kennebec's record flood on April 1-2.  Most of the 4-7" of warm rain fell on 3/31 following a week-long spell of 50s-60s attacking the remains of the January snowpack.  The North Sidney gauge reached 232,000 CFS, tops for any Maine river by about 40K - 22 feet above flood stage in Augusta, washed away Fort Halifax upriver, after the structure had survived for 245 years.  (About 1/3 of its timbers washed up on islands in the lower K'bec and were salvaged, with replacements for the rest enabling reconstruction of the fort.) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, BombsAway1288 said:

Really? You have 70" of snow on the year with "nickle and dime" events while us southern NE coasties have been teased and tortured all year. I would normally prefer a big dog too but in a year like this one I'll take whatever I can get

You make it sound like i'm complaining, Far from it, I'm at dead normal,  I was answering Mikes comment of what is considered big this winter, And storms of 6" would be big as they have been far and few, Of the 21 events, 4 have been over 6" and 2 that were 5" ones, The rest were 4" or less, But in a normal year, We would have seen some 12"+ events.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dryslot said:

You make it sound like i'm complaining, Far from it, I'm at dead normal,  I was answering Mikes comment of what is considered big this winter, And storms of 6" would be big as they have been far and few, Of the 21 events, 4 have been over 6" and 2 that were 5" ones, The rest were 4" or less, But in a normal year, We would have seen some 12"+ events.

There's also WSW verification disappointment.  I've kept track of warmed snowstorms starting with 2006-07.  We've had 6 to date this season, right on the median for those 13 winters and this one's not finished (I hope.)  4 of the 6 verified with less than the lower number of the forecast range - I use the latest forecast prior to first flakes as the measuring stick.  3 of those 4 were less than an inch below the mark, so it's not as if they were total disasters.  The other 2 landed within the range, one near the lower number and one near the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, tamarack said:

There's also WSW verification disappointment.  I've kept track of warmed snowstorms starting with 2006-07.  We've had 6 to date this season, right on the median for those 13 winters and this one's not finished (I hope.)  4 of the 6 verified with less than the lower number of the forecast range - I use the latest forecast prior to first flakes as the measuring stick.  3 of those 4 were less than an inch below the mark, so it's not as if they were total disasters.  The other 2 landed within the range, one near the lower number and one near the top.

Yeah, Most if not all, Fell short of expectations, I would not consider many this season as over performers, Maybe the November ones, But i'm not complaining....................:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, dryslot said:

You make it sound like i'm complaining, Far from it, I'm at dead normal,  I was answering Mikes comment of what is considered big this winter, And storms of 6" would be big as they have been far and few, Of the 21 events, 4 have been over 6" and 2 that were 5" ones, The rest were 4" or less, But in a normal year, We would have seen some 12"+ events.

See my last post on the last page

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Why? The EPS is favoring the closer time frame....that is good if you ask me.

Guidance is struggling over which wave to focus on, but I would rather have stronger support for a closer time frame.

I guess I was just meaning that they are not agreeing at all.  OP has a big storm Monday, but EPS has that look for Saturday.   To me that gave me pause that models don’t know what to key on, and that there is a bigger chance for complete failure lol.  But I see what you mean though,  and agree on that aspect for sure.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

We”ll see young man .. we’ll just have to see 

 

Mother nature is going to show us what a real crap pattern for snow is, at least there will be no more day 10 looks epic (then shiats  itself to an advisory or bust pattern w cutters ). Gimme warmth not blue balls and a foot job 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, STILL N OF PIKE said:

Mother nature is going to show us what a real crap pattern for snow is, at least there will be no more day 10 looks epic (then shifts itself to an advisory or bust pattern w cutters ). Gimme warmth 

Yeah but it’s mid March then. I don’t really think we have many snowy looks come then regardless lol. 

Many ways 18z euro going more coastal for later Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...