Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,502
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Weathernoob335
    Newest Member
    Weathernoob335
    Joined

December 8-10 Storm Discussion


Holston_River_Rambler
 Share

Recommended Posts

The ECMWF, ICON, and GFS-Para all halted the poor overnight trends.

Preliminary only: I'm going 1-3 inches from northwest TN, across KY/TN border and 1-2 counties each side. Upper Plateau (Tenn) Southeast KY into TRI could get 2-6 inches but the temp profile still, could be less could be much more. Southwest VA 4-8 inches seems reasonable. Of course the mountains will be hammered; 10-15 seems reasonable, esp NC side. It really is about elevation, as usual before Dec. 15.

Likely be a little ice during transition(s) to snow. Some risk of wet snow on top of ice. However it does not look awful, nor like a snow show stopper (where it snows).

This is my last forecast post of the event, with a busy weekend at home, but I will keep reading. Good luck to All! 

I really think it'll turn out OK despite the NAM and GFS-Op.

Vader_faith.PNG.c4239b58552ea9a39e2cb6b43af00678.PNG

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not surprised at the NW back building in the 12z ECMWF. At any rate, we're in hirez meso range. Global modeling at this point probably won't change or matter much with the 850-600 mb level weakness against the HP within 24 hours of event in progress. It's hirez meso time from this point forward folks. Good luck to everyone! Hope this event verifies for everyone and the sharp cutoff stays NW enough to produce for those posting/lurking.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

Dec 9th of last year we drove to Roan Mountain, almost a year to the day of this event.  I checked my obs from last year.  They had 10-12".   We went sledding and had a blast.  Another storm on the same date?  Pretty cool.

    I just made a post in the long range thread that kinda falls under this category.  Seems like we’ve see a trend with these systems over the past year or so.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a somewhat lighthearted note, who would like to place a friendly (hypothetical) bet on what MRX does during the PM update? I see three possible scenarios:

1) Hold serve with watches, no new areas or upgrades. (IE, passing the buck to night shift.)
2) Overcorrect based upon 0z and 6z suites, cutting all but the mountains out of the WSW area and giving the valley a WWA.
3) Push the chips all in, with WSWs extending several counties west of the current watch area. 12-16” in the mountains, 6-12” in TRI, 3-6” toward TYS. John doesn’t receive so much as a WWA, all but guaranteeing warning criteria snowfall in his backyard.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Blue Ridge said:

On a somewhat lighthearted note, who would like to place a friendly (hypothetical) bet on what MRX does during the PM update? I see three possible scenarios:

1) Hold serve with watches, no new areas or upgrades. (IE, passing the buck to night shift.)
2) Overcorrect based upon 0z and 6z suites, cutting all but the mountains out of the WSW area and giving the valley a WWA.
3) Push the chips all in, with WSWs extending several counties west of the current watch area. 12-16” in the mountains, 6-12” in TRI, 3-6” toward TYS. John doesn’t receive so much as a WWA, all but guaranteeing warning criteria snowfall in his backyard.
 

1...except upgrade current watch w/o extending it lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Blue Ridge said:

On a somewhat lighthearted note, who would like to place a friendly (hypothetical) bet on what MRX does during the PM update? I see three possible scenarios:

1) Hold serve with watches, no new areas or upgrades. (IE, passing the buck to night shift.)
2) Overcorrect based upon 0z and 6z suites, cutting all but the mountains out of the WSW area and giving the valley a WWA.
3) Push the chips all in, with WSWs extending several counties west of the current watch area. 12-16” in the mountains, 6-12” in TRI, 3-6” toward TYS. John doesn’t receive so much as a WWA, all but guaranteeing warning criteria snowfall in his backyard.
 

1) with the exception of warnings being declared in NE TN mountain counties.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TellicoWx said:

Ensembles lose wieght at this range, due to the general area doesn't change as much and we can look at the meso models to pinpoint more localized points within that area...members can't even figure where that area is within 48 hrs.

Are we in no mans land at the moment?  The snowfall I'm looking at is happening at 48-72 hours and many agree that the mesoscale models at that range are unreliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically, I use ensembles to see if the op matches up or is close.  If the operational is an outlier to its own suite, then you have to decide if it is leading the way or needs to be tossed.  I usually look to see if it makes sense and that it has support from other models.  I use global models all of the way up to the event.  Just look for trends.  The short range models just give better resolution and focus and allow for accurate forecasts in tighter grids...less smoothing at low resolution that looks wonky.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, EastKnox said:

Are we in no mans land at the moment?  The snowfall I'm looking at is happening at 48-72 hours and many agree that the mesoscale models at that range are unreliable.

Ensembles basically use chaos theory and test it by change one initial very small variable in the atmosphere to see the effect on a system. The wide range on the EPS members show how dynamic and changing this system still is. From ECMWF:

  "In a chaotic system, a slight change in the input conditions can lead to a significant change in the output forecast. In a non-chaotic system, small differences in initial conditions only give small differences in output. Hence, it is important in weather forecasting to investigate how sensitive the atmosphere is at any stage to initial conditions. Ensemble forecasting does this by looking at a spread of possible outcomes."

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This happens often. This is from a February storm thread a few years ago. It's 48 hours from the event happening. I think Todd was using the NAM or GFS here. As they often do, models started out showing a state wide event. Then trended east more and more until at 48-72 hours out they had dried out all but extreme eastern sections.

 

BgJqTGqCUAAh04Z.png

This was the RGEM

tcvtbK3.png

Ground reality was 8 inches for my area, 6 inches back to Crossville. 8-12 in the Central Valley. This was also the infamous downslope event that stopped snow in NE Tn at around 5.5 inches, but the next morning a secondary low dropped into the area and gave 1-3 more inches of snow to most of East Tennessee. Any of this sound familiar? The biggest difference is that there were no mixing or rain issues. It was much colder and February is more favorable for snow than early December. But the precip field was much larger. Several inches of snow fell in Kentucky during this event as well.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SHORT TERM...(Tonight and Saturday)...

Mostly cloudy to overcast skies will continue to fill in and lower

in height as we move into the weekend. Precipitation will begin to

move into the Chattanooga area tonight and continue to spread

northeastward across the Valley. We will likely see mostly rain in

the Valley locations early tomorrow, but temperatures around the

800-900 mb range will be near freezing... This means we could see

a wintry mix of rain, sleet, and possibly snow in some Valley

locations for a brief period. Any winter precipitation would be

very light and accumulation should be minimal (if any occur).

Higher up in the mountains temperatures should remain low enough

that any precipitation falls in the form of mainly snow. In the

higher terrain we could see some accumulations beginning overnight

into tomorrow morning.

 

During the daytime hours tomorrow, temperatures will warm up into

the upper 30`s in the Valley, but the mountainous areas will stay

closer to freezing, leading to more winter weather through most

of the day.

 

.LONG TERM...(Saturday night through Friday)...

Difficult forecast this afternoon in regard to potential wintry

precipitation this weekend and early next week. Different Model

solutions and Model inconsistency creates a low confidence forecast.

Lets begin...

 

For Saturday night...upper trough moves into the southern

Appalachians. The NAM has the strongest jet dynamic forcing over the

forecast area with the GFS showing the best dynamics over western

North Caroline. These differences are a key why the vertical

temperature profile (850mb temperatures) are much cooler for the NAM

than the GFS, thus producing more snowfall, especially in the valley.

 

After coordination with WPC and surrounding WFOs, will trend with

highest confidence and amounts over the far eastern Tennessee

Mountains where we will upgrade to a winter storm warning. For the

southwest Virginia, northeast Tennessee and Plateau, will

continue with near warning criteria snowfall amounts up to 4-5

inches, but confidence is too low to upgrade and will continue a

watch there.

 

For the central valley, a trace to 2 inches, higher ridges, are

expected.

 

for Sunday, wintry mix will continue in the morning, but diminishes

in the afternoon to mainly drizzle, except snow showers/flurries

higher elevations.

 

For Sunday night and Monday, again differences in the models in how

much precipitation will be around for the southern valley and

southwest North Carolina with upper trough axis. Rain/snow showers

or flurries is expected. Will need to watch this potential closer

later for later this weekend.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Runman292 said:

Well, at least MRX finally acknowledged the Plateau. Still didnt extend the watch to our neck of the woods, John. Definitely some encouraging trends this afternoon in the models.

It doesn't really matter if they put Campbell in or not, but I truly have no idea what they are seeing that makes them include Claiborne and not the rest of the Northern Plateau. Basically the models that hit there hit here, and the ones that don't miss us both by a wide margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mr Bob unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...