Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

Nov. 25th-26th Midwest Snowstorm Potential


Malacka11
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CoalCityWxMan said:

Honestly concerned about the state roads could be in tomorrow, with lots of people traveling home or back to school it could get real dangerous or even impossible to travel. Even half of what the euro is showing would be bad. 

Couple that this will be the first “major” snow of any type for the year. Classic line, don’t travel unless absolutely necessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harry Perry said:

Unreal. The range of solutions is giving even the best forecaster a run for their money. 

 

I’d hope that GRR and DTX put out at least a SWS or WSW this afternoon. You can always go to an advisory - but with tomorrow/tomorrow night being a big travel time, it would be wise.. especially if the Euro and like models happen to verify. 

That's what we SHOULD'VE been unnder since the models were at least equally split with a south track option. BUT, good ole GRR office leans on the NA models and ignores their own am write-up concerns with their watch box placement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Louieloy102 said:

Of note that's the Kuchera ratios and not 10:1, so probably even a "realistic" version of events.

Maybe MORE realistic, but still not realistic. The Euro will lump all frozen precip together as "snow," so in areas expected to mix even Kuchera snow ratios will be dramatically overdone. Like 8:1 instead of 2 or 3:1. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anyone (mostly N IL) people interested in the potential historical nature of this snow, the largest November snowstorm in Chicago’s history dropped 12 inches of snow. The date? Ironically enough, November 25th & 26th...1895!

Can’t say that it will happen, but there looks to be a chance.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OceanStWx said:

Maybe MORE realistic, but still not realistic. The Euro will lump all frozen precip together as "snow," so in areas expected to mix even Kuchera snow ratios will be dramatically overdone. Like 8:1 instead of 2 or 3:1. 

Great point.  I usually prefer looking at it more than a 10:1 map since it at least tries to account for different ratios, but only when you know you're going to be all snow.  Also have to consider things like ground temp, etc that the Kuchera map doesn't know about but in this case the rates should overcome that fairly quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoosier said:

Great point.  I usually prefer looking at it more than a 10:1 map since it at least tries to account for different ratios, but only when you know you're going to be all snow.  Also have to consider things like ground temp, etc that the Kuchera map doesn't know about but in this case the rates should overcome that fairly quickly.

Speaking of which, what type of rates are we looking at? I've seen many different things mentioned in different places thus far 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Great point.  I usually prefer looking at it more than a 10:1 map since it at least tries to account for different ratios, but only when you know you're going to be all snow.  Also have to consider things like ground temp, etc that the Kuchera map doesn't know about but in this case the rates should overcome that fairly quickly.

Onset rain and some places sitting at mid-upper 30s the night before it'll be tough at first but given strong dynamical cooling i can't imagine there being much of a mix, quick transition to steady/heavy snow. Thinking ratios will be under 10:1 though...weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

Great point.  I usually prefer looking at it more than a 10:1 map since it at least tries to account for different ratios, but only when you know you're going to be all snow.  Also have to consider things like ground temp, etc that the Kuchera map doesn't know about but in this case the rates should overcome that fairly quickly.

Kuchera has the greatest differences near zero, which is obviously the hardest to predict. For max temp aloft of -2C the ratio is 12:1, which is probably optimistic with a sounding that warm (but it does depend on the depth of that -2C layer, etc.). Increase the temp to -1C and the ratio goes down to 10:1. Freezing? 8:1. +2? 4:1!

So you can see how you can still get snow out of that method, even with very warm soundings. On the other end, very cold temps aloft can dramatically increase ratios when colder doesn't always mean great ratios. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoalCityWxMan said:

Yeah the RAP is trying to give some areas on the northern fringe some love. I’d agree with the general placement of the snow swath on the RAP

Perhaps. The RAP/HRRR are about a county or two north than the euro with the heavy snow. I think that doesn't come to fruition, but what I do think is plausible is the heavy snow right up until the edge. Seems that's often a feature in bigger storms(especially with dry air in the north) and something the globals don't handle too well. I think the area of literally nothing and 10" is going to be much tighter than current forecasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Gary will pull off a 60 mph gust.  I think it's possible given their proximity to the lake.  
Also since their observers very frequently overdo the wind speeds, something we've never figured out what they do on those hourly obs considering that they have an AWOS.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

Also since their observers very frequently overdo the wind speeds, something we've never figured out what they do on those hourly obs considering that they have an AWOS.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

At least 60 would be believable in this case.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this map looks pretty reasonable on how narrow the heaviest snow axis is likely to be given the intense fgen signal being modeled, if not the amounts. Though the ferrier correction is supposed to be good for low ratio events, so the attached 3km NAM map could be a fairly realistic representation. Similar to the 2015 storm, I buy a narrow area of 12"+ amounts. I think the Euro is too widespread with the huge amounts, but we'll see.

 

This is a good tweet from John Homenuk (former board member Earthlight) about the fgen compnent: https://mobile.twitter.com/jhomenuk/status/1066397512519610369

 

The models do a good job on picking up on the signal for intense fgen and negative epv driven banding but exact position is something that is really tough to pin down and is more of a nowcast item.1673cbae05ccd73d78c52f6de0e30340.jpg&key=cfa79fdbaac939e27b975ede187abeacb1aa5cbde7b8888256e5aab682d20302

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RCNYILWX said:

I think this map looks pretty reasonable on how narrow the heaviest snow axis is likely to be given the intense fgen signal being modeled, if not the amounts. Though the ferrier correction is supposed to be good for low ratio events. Similar to the 2015 storm, I buy a narrow area of 12"+ amounts. I think the Euro is too widespread with the huge amounts, but we'll see.

This is a good tweet from John Homenuk (former board member Earthlight) about the fgen compnent: https://mobile.twitter.com/jhomenuk/status/1066397512519610369

The models do a good job on picking up on the signal for intense fgen and negative epv driven banding but exact position is something that is really tough to pin down and is more of a nowcast item.

With that rime factor included, you can see how the snowfall distribution is sharpened on the southern, mix-y end of things.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...