Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,507
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SnowHabit
    Newest Member
    SnowHabit
    Joined

March 20th-22nd Suppressed, Fish, Not Coming Threat


Rjay

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, Nibor said:

What’s preventing northern and western precip expansion? Confluence? Placement of the SLP doesn’t look too bad. 

A further offshore track of the ULL, the heaviest is always going to be just a bit to the NW of where that low tracks. Yesterday is was about 50 miles closer to the coast.

sketched_5ab17178d322c.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

For those cheerleading the 18z NAM, my point was that it has the same sharp cutoff that the Euro has to the North, except that it's a bit further North. And initially it didn't look like anything was going to make it North of the city at all, but luckily that changed.

If the NAM is even 30-40 miles too far North, nobody North of the city is seeing much of anything.

The 18z has actually backed amounts in northern sections and increased southern sections of Orange County from the 12z run. 12k nam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

My only concern TBH is that the Euro ensembles were so miserable.  Otherwise I would not bat an eye about the Op run

3k NAM is really far north.

This is a forecasters nightmare. However, this distribution looks amazingly similar to Jan 2016 on a lesser scale. Even with the Sharp cut off I was north of the band and got a consolation prize of 11.5 inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

For those cheerleading the 18z NAM, my point was that it has the same sharp cutoff that the Euro has to the North, except that it's a bit further North. And initially it didn't look like anything was going to make it North of the city at all, but luckily that changed.

If the NAM is even 30-40 miles too far North, nobody North of the city is seeing much of anything.

Except your post made it seem like it was worse for the whole subforum.  Hence the reaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, nycwinter said:

 



 
Snow will overspread the area from the coast into the interior
during the morning hours becoming heavy with snowfall rates of
1 to 2 inches an hour in the afternoon. This could possibly move
in as early as late morning at the coast. As for the guidance,
since the 06Z run there has been a shift to the southeast with
the axis of heaviest precipitation, which now appears to be from
NYC northeast across Long Island and southern Connecticut. This
area has liquid equivalent amounts around 1.5 inches, with
lesser amount to the NW. Much of the area by the time the event
ends Wednesday night will receive between 10 to 16 inches of
snowfall with localized higher amounts. Briefly, there could be
a mix with sleet at the coast in the morning.

Unlike previous storms, this airmass is colder and drier and
with the onset of the moderate to heavy snowfall, temperatures
will likely remain at or below freezing for much of the event.
Thus, expect a higher snowfall ratio, closer to 10:1 or even
higher.

There is some uncertainty with the ECMWF solution pointing to
lower liquid equivalent amounts, but it appears to be an
outlier from the respect of a weaker closed low off the New
England coast by Wednesday night. The exact placement of the
heavy snow band is also a difficult thing to pinpoint, but a
well defined deformation zone and frontogenesis to the NW of
the low track points to this signal.

The winds will be gusty throughout the day on Wednesday, with
the strongest gusts across coastal Connecticut and coastal Long
Island. The winds will gust up to 30 mph across New York City,
and 35 to 45 mph across coastal sections of Connecticut and Long
Island. This will result in periods of near-blizzard conditions.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I put a lot of thought into this, final call

Inside the pink line - 1-3"

Inside the light blue line - 2-5"

Inside the dark blue line - 4-8"

Inside the green line - 5-10"

Inside the red line - 6-12"

Locally higher amounts possible in banding. Wouldn't shock me if someone pulled out 18", however confidence is below average on the higher amounts.

sketched_5ab1769a489ca.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rjay said:

It looked worse initially to me as well.   Just like the Euro looked better initially earlier. 

I saw the same changes at H5 on the NAM as I did on the Euro, that's why I said we were in trouble. As it turns out, the NAM wasn't that bad, however nothing says it's correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nycwinter said:

that is why upton said the latest euro run is a outlier

The Euro still had over 1 inch of LE for the City and points to the immediate north.  It cut back on totals to the "not so immediate north", but it was not such a horrendous run.  How, I did not see the EPS, but if they are as bad as everyone suggests, that may signal that something is up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

I put a lot of thought into this, final call

Inside the pink line - 1-3"

Inside the light blue line - 2-5"

Inside the dark blue line - 4-8"

Inside the green line - 5-10"

Inside the red line - 6-12"

Locally higher amounts possible in banding. Wouldn't shock me if someone pulled out 18", however confidence is below average on the higher amounts.

 

 

I'm thinking 6-12" for most of the subforum with locally 18" depending on where the heavy bands set up excluding eastern LI.

Daaam Yanks.  You have me riding the 2" line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

I put a lot of thought into this, final call

Inside the pink line - 1-3"

Inside the light blue line - 2-5"

Inside the dark blue line - 4-8"

Inside the green line - 5-10"

Inside the red line - 6-12"

Locally higher amounts possible in banding. Wouldn't shock me if someone pulled out 18", however confidence is below average on the higher amounts.

sketched_5ab1769a489ca.png

2-5in for the city? I personally think double that if not more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NJwx85 said:

I saw the same changes at H5 on the NAM as I did on the Euro, that's why I said we were in trouble. As it turns out, the NAM wasn't that bad, however nothing says it's correct.

Yup. I saw the same thing too.   That's all I was saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • BxEngine locked this topic
  • Rjay unlocked this topic
  • Rjay unpinned this topic

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...